Falk rails against “unlawful killings” that he blames on Israeli “dominance.” There are lawful killings the Palestinian Authority –those are the “honor killings” that the Palestinian Authority, operating under Jordanian law, allows and which Falk ignores.

Another allegation is that military law governs Arabs while settlers are under civil law. Not exactly true. With the exception of a couple dozen laws, settlers like myself are under military law. I cannot build a porch without the permission of the Defense Minister. My Palestinian neighbors can build on the shoulders of the main highway, and no authority will say “boo.” I am not protected by many laws that do not apply under “military rule.”

Advertisement



Falk, with amazing timing considering that the annual Israel Apartheid Week gets underway this week, re-asserted his claims that Israel is an apartheid state. “It seems incontestable that Israeli measures do divide the population of the Occupied Palestinian Territory along racial lines, create separate reserves for Palestinians and expropriate their land,” Falk wrote.

Virtually all of our readers, and let’s assume Falk is not one of them, know that the security fence, sometimes a wall, separates terrorists from human beings, whether Arab or Jew.

Palestinians are not on “reserves.” They live in their cities and villages, expand them at will. Every day they grab more of what once was Jordanian government land when Amman was occupying the Judea and Samaria. Across the highway from my community in the southern Hebron Hills, they have torn out crops planted by Jewish farmers and have built their own settlements with virtually no interference from the government.

Falk’s allegation that Israel practices “discrimination and systematic oppression of, and domination over, the Palestinian people” is a lie. There is more discrimination and oppression of Jews than of Arabs, particularly when it comes to building homes and farming land.

Falk’s solution” to all of the sins of Egypt and the Palestinian Authority is to boycott Israel, he said in his report.

U.N. member states should consider imposing a ban on imports of produce from Jewish settlements in the West Bank, Falk said in his final report to the U.N. Human Rights Council after serving six years in the independent post.

His report also left out Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas’ declarations that no Jews will be allowed to remain for a lengthy period in a Palestinian Authority country. He is willing to give the Jews three years to leave.

That is racism, according to Falk and his anti-Zionist buddies. That is democracy in action.

Advertisement

1
2
SHARE
Previous articleHarold Ramis, Writer of Popular Low-Brow Comedy Films, Dead at 69
Next articleLebanese Media Reports Israeli Air Force Bombed Hezbollah Posts
Tzvi Ben Gedalyahu is a graduate in journalism and economics from The George Washington University. He has worked as a cub reporter in rural Virginia and as senior copy editor for major Canadian metropolitan dailies. Tzvi wrote for Arutz Sheva for several years before joining the Jewish Press.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Falk last month also did the same thing with Syria.
    Falk tries to give the impression that Israel is responsible for Assad slaughtering Syrian civilians.
    This proves more and more what a sicko Falk is.

    Falk basically absolves Arabs from all guilt and blame for their violent murderous behavior. .
    Falk knows Arabs and Muslims cannot be expected to behave like civilized people so he makes excuses for their terrorist atrocities.

    Let me put what Falk wrote.
    http://richardfalk.wordpress.com/2014/01/10/the-emergent-palestinian-imaginary/#comment-17195
    Leadership in the region that dares challenge or threaten Israel. Iran has been the principal target of this Israeli projection of a tendency to punish disproportionately and violently those that stand in the way or exhibit hostility to the Israeli National Project. Syria is illustrative of the sort of fragmentation that weakens a neighboring country that has been hostile or in a conflictual relationship with Israel. A welcoming of the Egyptian coup that displaced the democratically elected government with an oppressive military leadership is a further disclosure of Israel’s conception of its security interests.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...