web analytics
March 28, 2015 / 8 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post


CUNY Claim of No Constitutional Violations at BC BDS Event Flawed

The standard for judging whether constitutional rights can be abrogated is not, as the Investigators claimed in their Report, based on sincerity, but on whether or not, at the very least, there was a reasonable belief that the Four were about to disrupt the BC BDS event. The Investigators stated clearly that there was no such reasonable belief at the time the Four were ejected from the event. Doesn't this mean the Investigators drew the wrong conclusion?

Brooklyn College BDS forum, Feb. 7, 2013

Brooklyn College BDS forum, Feb. 7, 2013
Photo Credit: Facebook

♦ One of the public safety officers, Raishawn Harris, told the Investigators that when he came out, Guzman told her that “he needed to remove four people who were causing a disturbance and interfering with the speech.” (R. pp. 28 – 29)

♦ The other public safety officer, Maureen Knight, told the Investigators that as she entered the event room, Guzman told her “that the students were disturbing the event and were waving some papers.” (R. p. 29)
◊Knight, however, told the Investigators that when she entered the room “she saw two women shuffling papers,” and two men “who were not doing anything.”  Knight also told the Investigators that “Guzman pointed to the two men and said they had to go too.” (R.p. 29)

♦ Director of Brooklyn College campus security Wenz told the Investigators that after the Four had been removed from the event, he asked Morales what happened.  Morales then told him the Four had been “holding and waving flyers and disrupting the event and that Guzman had asked them to leave.” (R.p. 29)

♦ Wenz told the Investigators he asked Morales what she wanted to do and she replied, “it’s their event.” (R.p. 29)

♦ Wenz then directed the officers to remove the Four from the area, and they were taken down the stairs. (R.p. 29)

In other words, with the exception of the unknown, unnamed female who was not interviewed by the Investigators, Guzman was the only one who said the Four were disrupting the event, creating a disturbance, and distributing and/or waving about leaflets.

GUZMAN MADE THE DETERMINATION AND DIRECTED THE EXPULSION OF THE FOUR

Carlos Guzman was the sole decision maker in a sea of faculty, administration, public safety officers and other adults.  Brooklyn College empowered this outsider to act as its agent, with complete control over how and whether, among other things, to honor the constitutional rights of Brooklyn College students.  And not one of the dozen or so Brooklyn College or CUNY representatives present that night lifted a finger, or a voice, to stop him.

The Four were removed from the BC BDS event room, barred from voicing their opinions, barred from speaking freely, unable to freely associate with their peers and unable to hear and engage in the debate as are their rights under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and as they had been promised and encouraged to do by no less than the president of Brooklyn College, Karen Gould, when she wrote to the school community on January 28, “we uphold their right to speak, and the rights of our students and faculty to attend, listen, and fully debate.”

The Jewish Press exchanged a series of emails with  CUNY’s Senior Vice Chancellor Jay Hershenson.  We asked why, given the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the Investigators refrained from making a determination that the Four had been discriminated against on the basis of their political viewpoint. Hershenson acted as the go-between with the Investigators.  This was his reply:

1.(a)  University Counsel indicated that the answer to your question is in the same paragraph from which you properly quote.   Counsel indicated that although there was some evidence that the motive was political discrimination, they  concluded that the preponderance of the evidence favored the conclusion that they were removed because of a sincere, albeit exaggerated fear of a disturbance by Guzman.
(b) Counsel advised that it is not the case that more evidence would have made it less speculative since there was no other source of evidence on the question of motivation.  Rather, based on all the evidence, Counsel concluded that the inference of discrimination was weaker than the inference that Guzman acted from a sincere but exaggerated fear of a disturbance.

But the law is that even if Guzman had been correct that a disturbance was about to erupt, his removal of the students would not have been justified. That is especially clear because the Investigators themselves recognized that any concern on Guzman’s part that the Four might become disruptive, even if it was sincere, was not reasonable.  The law is absolutely clear that only a “reasonable fear” of imminent violence can justify restriction of First Amendment protected activity.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the US correspondent for The Jewish Press. She is a recovered lawyer who previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “CUNY Claim of No Constitutional Violations at BC BDS Event Flawed”

  1. Stan Brin says:

    Anybody stupid enough to expect a different opinion?

  2. Gil Gilman says:

    No!

  3. Gil Gilman says:

    This report reminds me of a Mark Twain quote, "there are lies, damned lies, and statistics." I leave it to you the reader to prove that the 36 page report doesn't fall under all three categories.

  4. Alan Kardon says:

    This is a publicly funded school. Why are we hearing that it was run by incompetent people. Let some heads roll and get better administrators.

  5. An incompetently run event is bad enough. A politically slanted event is worse, though not exactly a big surprise. BUT — a report by intelligent lawyers, at a fancy law firm, paid, no doubt, lots of tax dollars do to their 36 page legal analysis — for such a report to get the law WRONG? That's a big problem.

    I hope the students whose rights were violated have read this article, and the report, and that they are prepared to do something about it. This being America, the thing to do when your rights are violated is to hold the violators to account. In court.

  6. Anonymous says:

    As I listen to the Boston events today the uncle of the bombers said that they were not raised like this. He said they must have been radicalized elsewhere. My first thought was that they probably went to a BDS event on campus. This is why BDS, and other hate organizations, should be kept off campuses.

    This is what Karen Gould, BC President doesn't understand. This wasn't about free speech. This was about prevention of violence.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.
Iran Says ‘Don’t Believe the Headlines’ that Deal is Imminent
Latest News Stories
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif.

It is a long tradition in the Muslim world never to agree to anything at an agreed time.

Hamas test fired a rocket on Saturday, the rocket landed within the Gaza Strip.

Rare picture taken during construction of the Dimona nuclear plant in the Negev

Israel was aware of the report’s impending release and did not object.

The PA hasn’t changed anything on their end, so why did Netanyahu suddenly change his policy?

Obama’s “two-state” phobia shows how much he and his experts do not understand the Middle East.

Kosher for Passover? Depends who you ask.

The main suspect confessed to passing on information to Syria through the Internet.

Has anyone asked Obama why Netanyahu should even think about agreeing to a Palestinian Authority country?

A U.S. Air Force F-15 warplane dropped approximately 60,000 leaflets over the Syrian city of Raqaa to discourage people from joining the Islamic State (ISIS), the Pentagon revealed Thursday. The “Military Information Support Operations,” propaganda campaign was carried out last week and was the first time the United States has used the tactic in Syria. […]

Israel reportedly wants to change the names to Hebrew, which would affront Muslim sensitivities.

The non-binding vote approves funds for imposing sanctions if Iran violates a deal.

Congress is ‘fed up’ with being left in the dark on the Iran negotiations

While there’s not much snow left, there are bike trails, hiking trails and extreme mountain sleds.

More Articles from Lori Lowenthal Marcus
Iran's nuclear enrichment facility at Fordow is in an underground bunker.

Congress is ‘fed up’ with being left in the dark on the Iran negotiations

Saudi Arabia has begun airstrikes on neighboring Yemen, which has been overtaken by Iranian-backed rebels.

Saudi Arabia began airstrikes on neighboring Yemen which has been taken over by Iranian-backed Houthi rebels.

Obama says Bibi has to prove he supports a “two-state solution.”

Obama’s Chief of Staff chides Netanyahu at the J Street Conference for refusing to embrace fantasy as reality.

A Cruz presidency as antidote to Obama: repeal Obamacare, dismantle the IRS, strong support for Israel.

The anti-Bibi campaign’s quiet change in tax status both came too late and constitutes an admission of wrongdoing.

V15 is barred from attempting to achieve its stated goals: defeat Bibi and create a Palestinian State.

US Embassy and consulates in Saudi Arabia closed due to ‘heightened security concerns.’

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/cuny-claim-of-no-constitutional-violations-at-bc-bds-event-flawed/2013/04/19/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: