web analytics
February 5, 2016 / 26 Shevat, 5776

Posts Tagged ‘Mexico’

Israeli Spy Drones Going After Mexican Drug Cartels

Tuesday, March 20th, 2012

In January, The Marker reported that Israel-based, international defense electronics company Elbit Systems Ltd. had won a contract worth $50 million to supply the unmanned drone Hermes 900 to an unknown state on the American continent. Now Aviation Weekly reveals it must be the Mexican government.

The Hermes 900 drone is based on the operational experience gained from the Hermes 450, which is in use by the IDF in its operations. The Hermes 900 has a wide range of advanced capabilities, including longer flying time, flying at an altitude of up to 30 thousand feet, and the ability to carry large cargo. The craft’s unique configuration allows it to carry a variety of payloads of different sizes and shapes, and to switch between them as quickly as needed.

The Elbit website lists some of the Hermes 900’s capabilities as follows:

Take-off weight ……….1,180 kg Max Payload……………350 kg Endurance………………36 hours Service Ceiling…………30,000 ft Range……………………..Unlimited

And now Aviation Week is reporting that the Israeli spy drone is probably going to be purchased by the Mexican government, to use in spying on the drug cartels.

AW’s Paul McLeary writes that a friend in Mexico pointed to a curious entry on the Mexican Treasury Ministry’s special projects web page, posted on Dec. 20, 2011, stating the “acquisition of unmanned aircraft, ground segment and additional payloads for the Federal Police” for 744 million pesos, which is equivalent to about $50 million U.S. dollars.

McLeary also cites a Mexican Treasury document that details the “acquisition of two Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 900, ground command-and-control system and additional payload.”

Wired Magazine suggests, based on the AW scoop, that “chances are that the Hermes 900 is headed for the skies above Juarez.”

The Mexicann government has deployed drones against the cartels before, but McLeary insists the Hermes 900 represents a “huge upgrade.” He says Mexico’s military uses at least two Israeli Hermes 450 drones and they have more than a dozen smaller, hand-launched “micro-UAVs.”

Tiny Steps Towards a Big Goal

Sunday, March 18th, 2012

Often, when I return home to Israel after a speaking tour in North America, I am asked by my Israeli friends: “Nu, did you get people to make Aliyah?”

I explain that I prefer not to talk much about Aliyah while I am abroad. I try to get Jews to reawaken their love for the homeland, connect with the life in Israel and I find that the issue of Aliyah often distances my audience. Though I am a firm believer in the in-gathering of the exiles, when I speak to Jews around the world, I am trying to bridge worlds, not drive them apart.

Indeed, the biggest schism  in the Jewish world today is the great Atlantic Divide. Six million Jews live in North America, and six million live across the ocean in Israel. The Jewish nation exists in worlds apart: One attends Liberal Arts colleges, the other fights in the army; one speaks English, the other Hebrew; they read different books and watch different TV shows. The Jewish people’s geographic and cultural divide can easily become an unbridgeable gap.

North American Jews are concerned and have taken real steps to bridge the Atlantic Divide through one-year Yeshiva programs in Israel, gap year studies in Israeli universties, internship programs, and, of course, Birthright-Israel, the amazing project that has changed the lives of tens of thousands young Jews.

But still, it’s not enough. 80% of North American Jews have never been to Israel, and most Israelis have no connection to American Jewish life. That is why Israelis, people like outspoken author A.B. Yehoshua, are worried about their North American Jewish brothers and sisters. Israelis are afraid to lose their American family to assimilation, and they are afraid of growing apart.

While A.B. Yehoshua may be right about the problem, his recent harsh words (in which he calls American Jews “partial Jews” for not living in Israel) do not help much. There are no partial Jews, we are a family, a tribe, a nation, and we simply cannot allow our people to become disconnected. We should never talk down to Jews, we should talk up, inspire, and heal. To bring the family together, you need to talk in the language of love.

And you also need vision. Our people need a star to guide us toward one goal that will eventually bring us back together.

What is this vision?

The vision of a rebuilt Jerusalem is one which our people have shared ever since we were dispossessed of our land 2,000 years ago. From Addis Ababa to LA, from Kabul to Vienna, our people have always proclaimed “Next Year in a Rebuilt Jerusalem!” No matter where we are on the globe, no matter our persecution or comfort, we have had only one homeland and one capital to which our heart has belonged.

To foster that vision, and to make it applicable in our lives, we need to get behind the idea of mass Aliyah.

“But wait?? Didn’t you just tell us not to  preach Aliyah because it’s divisive?”

Let me explain: There is the grand ideal of making Aliyah, that is, moving to Israel, and that issue may be divisive. But the word “Aliyah” in Hebrew also refers to the process of going up and there are many steps in the staircase before you get to the landing. And that is exactly what we have to do – take steps towards our united goal with each step being a mini-Aliyah. Those steps can be big or small, but they are steps nonetheless. Deciding to drink only Israeli wine on Shabbat is a type of Aliyah. Putting up a poster of Jerusalem in your house, or a flag, is a type of Aliyah. Sending your kids on Birthright, or to studies in Israel is an Aliyah. Buying real-estate in Israel is definitely an Aliyah.

Aliyah means that we, as a nation, take whatever steps we can towards Jewish unity by recognizing the centrality of Israel in our national life.

And here is another example of mini-Aliyah which is very pertinent in this season:

If you have the budget to vacation this Passover, you certainly have many wonderful alternatives to choose from around the world –

“Celebrate Passover at the Ritz-Carlton Golf Resort, Naples. Rich in tradition and excellence.”

“The Best Passover Vacations Under the Sun are in Mexico, Arizona and Florida. Glatt Kosher.”

“5 Deluxe Passover Resorts – in Florida, New York, Arizona & Italy with Leisure Time Tours.”

“Magical Passover 2012 Vacation in Orlando, Florida at the Luxurious Doubletree by Hilton Orlando at SeaWorld.”

These are great places, no doubt, and I totally understand the need to take one’s few precious vacation days and get away from the stress. However, your Passover vacation is also an opportunity to make a mini-Aliyah with your family and to arrive at the international Passover hub – Jerusalem. The term Aliyah actually comes from the concept of going up to Jerusalem three times a year during the Festivals, so coming to Israel on Passover is definitely an Aliyah!

Nothing shows our values as a nation more then the way we celebrate the Holiday of Freedom. When we choose Jerusalem over Orlando we strengthen the bond of brotherhood within the Jewish Nation, our core values shine through, and our children imbibe it. The world, too, notices when we put Jerusalem ahead of other destinations and it strengthens our nation’s claim to the land.

So this year, let us start making Aliyah as a nation, lets bridge the great Atlantic Divide, and let us make good on what we said at last year’s Seder: “Next year in Jerusalem”.

Quick Takes: News You May Have Missed

Wednesday, July 13th, 2011

Project Gunrunner Won’t Go Away
   Project Gunrunner, the controversial government program that runs guns into Mexico under the Obama administration, has contributed to fraudulent statistics seemingly targeting U.S. gun owners.
   The misleading data raise questions about the intentions of Project Gunrunner, which some believe could be a defining scandal for the White House.
   In February 2008, William Hoover, assistant director for field operations of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, testified before Congress that over 90 percent of the firearms that have been recovered in or intercepted in transport to Mexico originated from various sources within the U.S.
   Hoover’s statistics officially were released by the ATF and subsequently were cited in a flurry of news media pieces claiming the vast majority of illicit firearms in Mexico originate in the U.S.
   The U.S. Government Accountability Office also used the ATF’s 90 percent statistic in an official report to Congress about American firearms. The Justice Department even incorporated the data in several of its programs.
   After a series of independent reports contradicted the ATF claims, however, the bureau then admitted in November 2010 that its 90 percent figure cited to Congress “could be misleading” because it applied only to the small portion of guns verified through its program.
   Project Gunrunner is purportedly meant to stop the sale and export of U.S. guns to Mexico by denying Mexican drug cartels firearms. However, the project allegedly has resulted in allowing thousands of guns to cross into Mexico, where many of the weapons currently are untraceable and in the hands of Mexican criminals.
   The same guns run into Mexico under the Project Gunrunner scheme reportedly have been recovered from crime scenes in Arizona and throughout Mexico.

   One gun, reportedly recovered at the scene, is allegedly the weapon used to murder Customs and Border Protection Agent Brian Terry on Dec. 14, 2010.


Libyan Rebels, Egyptian Radicals

And The Obama White House
   The foreign affairs adviser for a top U.S. lobby firm hired to represent the rebels of Libya served a few months ago as President Obama’s special representative to Egypt, where he reportedly held a clandestine meeting with the Muslim Brotherhood.
   In addition, a public relations firm working on behalf of the rebels recently arranged a meeting for Libya’s opposition with a progressive group funded by billionaire George Soros that is known for its close relationship with the White House.
   This column previously reportedthat the International Crisis Group, or ICG, led in part by Soros, has long petitioned for the Egyptian government to normalize ties with the Muslim Brotherhood.
   The ICG includes on its board Egyptian opposition leader Mohamed ElBaradei and other personalities who champion dialogue with Hamas, a violent offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood.
   This column also reportedon the numerous ties of Soros initiatives – including his own Open Society Institute – to the revolutions sweeping the Middle East and North Africa.
   Earlier this week, The Hill reported that Patton Boggs, the top-earning K Street firm, is lobbying for the rebels to be accepted in the international community as the “legitimate government of the sovereign nation of Libya,” according to documents filed this week.
   Patton Boggs’s foreign affairs adviser is career diplomat Frank Wisner.
   Wisner previously served as vice chairman of American International Group, leaving it for Patton Boggs in 2009, just as AIG – one of the world’s biggest insurers – was seized by the Obama administration in an $85 billion bailout deal.
   In February, during the revolution that led to the ouster of Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak, a staunch U.S. ally, Wisner was dispatched by the White House to Cairo to serve as Obama’s temporary representative there.
   This reporter revealed at the timethat Wisner allegedly held a secret meeting at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo with Essam El-Erian, a senior leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, the nation’s major Islamist opposition group.
   Another group reportedly now representing the rebels since April is the Harbour Group, which handles public relations for the opposition movement.
   At the beginning of April, Reuters reported that Harbour arranged a well-attended talk by the rebel government’s Washington representative at the Center for American Progress, or CAP.
   CAP is heavily financed by Soros. It is reportedly highly influential in helping to craft White House policy. CAP is led by John Podesta, who served as co-chair of Obama’s presidential transition team.

   Former Obama “green jobs” czar Van Jones is a CAP fellow. Jones resigned in 2009 after reports surfaced that he founded a communist revolutionary group.


Jihadist Leader:

Al Qaeda Nowhere Near Defeat
   A representative of Al Qaeda in the Gaza Strip scoffed at a statement by Leon Panetta in which the newly appointed defense secretary claimed the U.S. “is within reach of strategically defeating” the global jihadist group.
   “What Panetta said is nonsense and is for internal U.S. consumption only,” Abu Saqer, leader of Jihadiya Salafiya in the Gaza Strip, told this reporter. “It’s not supported by facts on the ground.”
   Jihadiya Salafiya represents Al Qaeda in the Gaza Strip.
   Saqer said Panetta doesn’t understand the methodology of Al Qaeda nor its operations.
   “Al Qaeda as a structure is not one centralized organization, but it’s an umbrella for many smaller organizations. Sometimes these groups act with no direct link between other groups, and at other times there is coordination and working together,” he said.
   The jihadist leader vowed revenge for bin Laden’s assassination:

   “All intelligence data in the world says Al Qaeda sympathizers are only growing around world, and very soon the world will start seeing Al Qaeda reactions to the assassination of Sheik Osama bin Laden.”



   Aaron Klein is Jerusalem bureau chief and senior reporter for WorldNetDaily.com. He is also host of an investigative radio program on New York’s 770-WABC Radio, the largest talk radio station in the U.S., every Sunday between 2-4 p.m.

Angel In Mexico

Wednesday, October 27th, 2010

Normally, I enjoy air travel. But the night before a recent flight to Los Cabos, Mexico, I developed an excruciating earache. I tried nursing it with organic eardrops, but by the time we arrived at the airport, the pain had only intensified.

My husband was surprised that I had agreed to travel in this condition. As it turned out, the flight was uneventful, and I managed to arrive at our destination in fair spirits. We were scheduled to visit the local Chabad Center for the Minchah/Ma’ariv services shortly after our arrival. I planned to ask the rebbetzin for the name of a local doctor.

While checking in at the front desk at our resort hotel, a man called out to us, “Are you having problems? If so, call Rabbi Benny.”

Startled, we told him that we already knew Rabbi Benny, and that we were planning to get directions to his Chabad center for evening services. The man responded, “No problem. I will take you there.”

We gratefully agreed to meet him after unpacking our bags for the ride to the Chabad center. On the way there, I asked him if he knew of a local doctor, as by then my earache had significantly worsened. I could hardly swallow on the left side of my throat.

Amazingly, he responded, “I am a doctor.”

I asked incredulously, “Are you really a doctor?”

He said, “Yes. When I met you in the lobby, I was there to see a patient.”

By the time we got over this miracle, we arrived at our destination. The doctor introduced himself as Dr. Mark Head.

After davening with a group of tourists from around the world, we were all invited to dinner. As we proceeded to sit down, Dr. Head appeared and handed me a bag full of medications.

Here I was sitting at a Chabad center in Los Cabos, Mexico, being treated royally by a mystery physician. Hashem does wonders! We felt that Dr. Head was an angel from heaven.

We found a great friend in Mark, as he also took it upon himself to be our tour guide.

We thank Hashem for this amazing event.

Never forget to look around in a time of need. You never know which angels Hashem has sent to help you in your predicament.

A Presidential Failure To Communicate

Wednesday, June 2nd, 2010

As millions of gallons of oil continue to leak into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, the impatience and helplessness of Americans continue to grow. Never before has such a significant issue relating to our country’s environmental health been at the mercy of a faulty valve. This unprecedented experience has humbled engineers, scientists and bureaucrats alike.

As the oil flowed unabated, Democratic strategist and Louisiana native James Carville publicly railed against the White House, accusing it of not being responsive enough to the crisis in the Gulf.

President Obama, who campaigned as the champion of ordinary Americans, had hoped, as all presidents do, that his press conference would reassure frustrated citizens that he and his administration – not BP Global – were in charge and on top of the disaster. In attempting to do so, however, he again blamed his predecessor, asserting that the current lax oversight of oil and drilling companies was “what Secretary Ken Salazar found when he came in.”

So while politics ideally shouldn’t play a role in this or any national catastrophe, the president once again forced the important question to the fore – when does the “blame Bush” era officially end?

From the disjointed response to the BP disaster, to the lack of a clear message explaining Obama’s reversal regarding Guantanamo Bay, to the hollow initiative to finally place 1,200 National Guardsmen on the porous Arizona border, many Americans feel the president has failed to provide a steady hand of leadership.


Despite co-opting several Bush era domestic policies, the administration, now in its sixteenth month, still feels the need to blame the purported shortcomings of the Bush White House when any crisis arises. But as problems mount in the Gulf of Mexico, on the Mexican border, and with continued economic instability throughout the country, Americans are growing tired of the blame game.

More important, the Iranians, Russians, Chinese, North Koreans and others have taken notice of the administration’s weaknesses. Events confirm that these countries have concluded that America, specifically this administration, no longer stands up for its friends or long-held convictions.

For a president whose vision of U.S. foreign policy is based on engagement and diplomacy, the administration’s inability to rally support for meaningful sanctions against Iran is particularly glaring. Our enemies note that the administration inexplicably courts our adversaries and dismisses and mistreats our allies. Israel, of course, has been the most hurt by this approach.

The recent shift in U.S.-Israel relations was clearly intended to score points with Muslim regimes. Unsurprisingly this shift has paid zero dividends, and, actually exacerbated an already difficult situation.

In the face of intense criticism from American grass-roots supporters of Israel and mounting pressure from Congressional Democrats (who themselves were finally spurred to action by the same grass-roots supporters), Obama initiated a “charm offensive” aimed at Israel’s Jewish supporters.

But even with the recent efforts to rectify the administration’s outreach and communication effort to the larger pro-Israel community – an effort which, in the memorable words of White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, was “screwed up” – the lack of a cohesive message and policy is still very much a reality.

Raising tensions even further, the Obama administration just voted at the UN-sponsored Non-Proliferation Treaty Review Conference to permit international inspections of Israel’s nuclear program, breaking with previous administrations, Republican as well as Democrat.

New Jersey Democratic Congressman Steve Rothman can assert all he wants that Obama is the best president for Israel ever, but we should bear in mind that under unprecedented pressure from the American government there is still no natural growth permitted in Judea and Samaria, and the State Department still shows more enthusiasm for enforcing the construction freeze in Jewish Jerusalem than it does for stopping uranium enrichment in Tehran.

The Pacific Rim and the Persian Gulf are powder kegs and the Gulf Coast is facing an environmental and economic disaster, and yet the president’s iron will oddly seems not to extend past Jewish construction in Israel’s capital.

As patriotic Americans and staunch supporters of Israel, we find this difficult to understand. With turbulent times upon us once again, American Jews look to the White House and Congress for staunch support of Israel in actions, not merely words.

In the Clutches of the Inquisition

Wednesday, April 9th, 2008

Note: This essay is based on “Crypto-Jews in Mexico during the Sixteenth Century” by Arnold Wiznitzer, American Jewish Historical Quarterly, 51, 1962 (www.ajhs.org/reference/adaje.cfm) Unless otherwise indicated, all quotes are from the Wiznitzer article.

During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries the Catholic Church did its utmost to root out any vestige of Jewish religious observance among New Christians.

New Christians, also known by the names Anusim and Marranos, were descendents of Jews who had been forced to convert to Christianity in Spain and Portugal during the final decade of the fifteenth century. Some were willing to risk everything in order to maintain as much Jewish practice as they could. Being accused of Judaizing (practicing Jewish rituals) meant undergoing torture, loss of property and social status, and, if all else failed, death by burning at the stake. Nonetheless, a not inconsiderable number of Anusim clung to their Jewish faith even though the easiest thing for them to do would have been to renounce it.

The Inquisition followed the Jews to the New World, and a number of trials of Judaizers were held in regions that were under the control of Spain and Portugal. One of the most interesting personalities to be tried by the Inquisition in Mexico during the sixteenth century was Luis de Carvajal, Jr. (1567-1596). His commitment to and the sacrifices he made for Judaism are nothing less than inspiring.

Luis was born in Benavente, Portugal, and was baptized by the bishop of Benavente. His early education consisted of reading, writing, and basic mathematics. Later, he attended a Jesuit school for three years where he was taught Latin and rhetoric. His father, Francisco Rodriguez, was a Marrano who influenced his wife and most of his nine children to live as crypto-Jews.

In 1584 Luis and his family immigrated to Mexico with his uncle. The uncle, who became governor of the New Kingdom of Leon in Mexico, had no sympathy for Marranos despite his Jewish background, and Luis could never reveal to him his family’s secret Jewish practices. His father died not long after the family arrived in Mexico, and Luis succeeded him as the head of their large family.

Luis explored the northern territories of Mexico with his uncle. On these journeys he sought the company of fellow crypto-Jews and attempted to learn what he could of Judaism from those who knew more than he. Although well educated for his time, Luis’s Jewish learning was limited and his Jewish practice was based on a Latin translation of the Tanach and a few fragments from the Jewish prayer book. Nonetheless, his memoirs clearly demonstrate his insatiable desire to acquire Jewish learning and observe as much of Judaism as he could.

His drive to become an observant Jew is clear from his description of how, after his father’s passing, he circumcised himself in a ravine of the Panuco River:

When the Lord took my father away from this life, I returned to Panuco, where a clergyman sold me a sacred Bible for six pesos. I studied it constantly and learned much while alone in the wilderness. I came to know many of the divine mysteries. One day I read chapter 17 of Genesis, in which the Lord ordered Abraham, our father, to be circumcised – especially those words which say that the soul of him who will not be circumcised will be erased from among the book of the living. I became so frightened that I immediately proceeded to carry out the divine command. Prompted by the Almighty and His good angel, I left the corridor of the house where I had been reading, leaving behind the sacred Bible, took some old worn scissors and went over to the ravine of the Panuco River. There, with longing and a vivid wish to be inscribed in the book of the living, something that could not happen without this holy sacrament, I sealed it by cutting off almost all of the prepuce and leaving very little of it. [Translated by Seymour B. Liebman in The Enlightened, The Writings of Luis de Carvajal, The University of Miami Press, 1967]

Luis and some of the members of his family became the focal point of a network of crypto-Jews based in Mexico City. He and some of his siblings encouraged former Jews to return to Judaism. Through their efforts, Jews were circumcised, studied Tanach together and observed the festivals. It was only a matter of time before Luis’s Judaizing would come to the attention of Catholic officials.

First Trial

On April 20, 1589, a warrant for Luis’s arrest was signed by the Inquisitional judges of the public prosecutor of the Holy Office in Mexico City. It was based on testimony obtained from his uncle and brother while they were being tortured. As noted, Luis’s uncle was most certainly not a Judaizer. In fact, he was strongly opposed to those who were. Nonetheless, he was brought to trial on trumped up charges and tortured. He finally “confessed” to observing some Jewish rituals and implicated members of his family for the same “offenses.”

Luis, who had gone into hiding, was found in his mother’s house on May 9 and immediately imprisoned. He was questioned a number of times over the next few months and urged to confess his “crimes.” He consistently maintained his innocence, however, insisting he had nothing to confess.

The public prosecutor, Dr. Lobo Guerrero, read a writ of accusation against Luis at a hearing held on July 27, 1589:

Luis, a baptized and confirmed Christian, is a heretic and apostate against the Catholic Church. A descendant of Jews, he has returned to Judaism and has practiced the ceremonies and rites of the Law of Moses, believing that he could obtain salvation in that way. A parent of Luis had asked him while he, the father, lay dying to wash his corpse according to the Jewish rite in order that it should not be buried unclean; Luis had studied the Old Testament and the Prophets in order to be more knowledgeable in his practice of Judaism; he quoted the Prophets habitually; and it was impossible to convince him that the Prophets had predicted that Jesus Christ would come as the Messiah; he had run away to Vera Cruz when his sister, Isabel de Andrade, was imprisoned by the Holy Office and finally that he had protected Judaizers by not denouncing them.

“Luis was again questioned about his Jewish practices and threatened with being tortured in order to make him confess the truth. Finally, on August 7, 1589, apparently seeing no way out of his predicament, he voluntarily appeared before the Inquisitors, “went down on his knees, kissed the floor, shed tears, beat his breast, and said: ‘Peccavi, miscricordia‘ [‘I have sinned, mercy, mercy’].”

Luis appeared before the court several times during August and September. He confessed his father had taught him that the Law of Moses is the only true law, that one is forbidden to eat pork and fish without scales, and had also explained to him the reasons for observing the Sabbath, Passover and other Jewish holidays, rites and ceremonies. He also said his father had read the prophets Ezekiel and Isaiah and had told him the messiah had not yet arrived. He told the courts that these teachings of his father had influenced him to practice Judaism, and that he had indeed practiced Judaism for the past five years.

He followed this confession with the claim “that his heart had been entirely converted to Christianity during the last few days. After having made his depositions, Luis kneeled again and declared that he was a believing Catholic willing to live and die as a good Christian. Following the usual legal procedures of the tribunal, on February 24, 1590, Luis was permitted to be reconciled to the Catholic faith at an auto-da-f?, after public abjuration of his errors. He was condemned to wear the penitential cloak [sambenito] and to perpetual imprisonment.”

The Holy Office in Mexico did not have a prison for those sentenced to lifelong imprisonment. As a result, Luis was transferred to San Hipolito Martyr, a convalescent home in Mexico City, where he was required to perform any services the hospital administrator would require of him. He spent two years at this hospital doing all sorts of menial labor, completely isolated from his family.

Luis’s mother and four sisters, who had also been tried for Judaizing and been reconciled with the church in the auto-da-f? of 1590, were confined to an isolated house near the College of the Holy Cross of Tlaltelolco in Mexico City. In 1592 one of Luis’s brothers-in-law petitioned the Inquisitors to allow Luis to live with his mother and sisters, so that they would not be left without a man’s protection. The request was granted. Luis “found his mother and sisters completely overcome by their experiences with the Inquisition, but it was not long before he persuaded them again to practice Jewish rites.”

The Carvajals developed a relationship with Father Pedro de Oroz, supervisor of the College of the Holy Cross. As a result, Father Pedro made Luis his private secretary and a Latin instructor at the college. He also gave Luis the keys to the college’s library. This gave Luis access to many classical works, including Josephus Flavius’s History of the Jews.

After the students left each day, Luis would spend hours studying the Bible and other works. One day he came across a book that contained the Rambam’s Thirteen Principles of Jewish faith. These Ikarim were completely unknown to those living under the Inquisition. The net result was that Luis greatly increased his knowledge of Judaism.

For several years a relative of the Carvajals had been petitioning the authorities for their release. In 1594 the request was granted, and, after the payment of a fine, they were released from all of the penalties imposed upon them in 1590.

Luis remained a free man for a little more than three months. “On February 1, 1595, the Public Prosecutor of the Holy Office denounced Luis, then twenty-eight years old, as a relapsed heretic, apostate, and Judaizer, and obtained from the Inquisitors an authorization for Luis’s arrest, which was executed during the night of February first and early the next morning. When he was searched by the jailer of the secret prison, a leather bag was found on his person which contained three small books in black leather and bearing the hand lettered titles Psalmorum, Prophets, and Genesis.”

Second Trial

“The new prosecution of Luis was based upon the testimony of some seventeen witnesses, all of whom confirmed the fact that Luis engaged in Judaizing practices after his reconciliation to Catholicism in 1590; but as it turned out, the most damaging witness was Luis himself.”

One of the witnesses testified that Luis and his family greeted him in the Jewish manner with the words “May God be with you.” He also said that on Yom Kippur he saw Luis, his mother and sisters on their knees facing east, praying and weeping. A cellmate, Luis Dias, a planted informer, testified that Luis prayed in his cell for hours, kneeling with his face to the east while wearing a hat. In addition, he said that whenever Luis pronounced the name of Hashem, he would kiss the floor. He and other witnesses reported many other Jewish practices of the accused.

Luis realized that as a relapsed apostate who had abjured his heresy in 1590, he would most certainly be sentenced to death at his second trial. Further, he was now, at age twenty-eight, a very different man from when he was first tried. At that time his knowledge of Judaism was rudimentary, whereas now he knew the Bible and some of its commentaries well. And he had become an enthusiastic follower of Judaism as well as “a mystic who was given to fasting and praying, and the writing of religious poetry.”

Therefore at this trial he openly declared his Jewish beliefs and practices. When asked whether in the future he desire to follow Judaism, he “responded that he wished to live and die observing the Law of Moses.” In response to another question he gave nine reasons for denying the Catholic faith.

Luis was imprisoned and tortured for nearly two years. Finally, on December 8, 1596, he was burned at the stake in Mexico City with his mother, Francisca, and three of his sisters – Isabel, Leonor and Catalina. No Jewish woman had been executed in Mexico until then.

Conflicting accounts of his death have been circulated. Before his body was consumed in the flames a priest claimed that he had been garroted [strangled]. The same priest suggests that he kissed a crucifix held up to his lips. If the priest’s account is correct (which is by no means certain), he almost certainly did so solely to avoid the pain of being burned alive, for such was the price of an expedited death. He was survived by his saintly sister, Anica, and a beloved disciple, Justa Mendez. His brothers, Baltazar and Miguel, escaped to Europe. [my.opera.com/Rev4u/blog/show.dml/834923]

Sadly, this marked the end of Luis Carvajal Jr.’s short life. One can only marvel at his commitment to Judaism in the face of unbelievable opposition and ruthless oppression.

The Inquisition in Mexico mercilessly hunted and persecuted crypto-Jews. Between 1577 and 1596 sixty-four “Judaizers” were tried. Of these, only one was set free. Thirty-eight of them, when they were tried for the first time, “repented” at least formally, asked for mercy from the Church, abjured their “heretic” errors, and became reconciled to Catholicism. However, they lost their possessions, were condemned to prison, and expelled from Mexico. Fifteen were burned in effigy, because they had either escaped from Mexico or died. Ten crypto-Jews were condemned to death and burned at the stake.

Crypto-Jews had hoped that by coming to the New World they would avoid the Inquisition, but they were sadly mistaken. The Catholic Church was intent on finding and punishing those who longed for nothing more than to practice the faith of their ancestors.

Dr. Yitzchok Levine is a professor in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey. His regular Jewish Press column, “Glimpses Into American Jewish History,” appears the first week of each month. Dr. Levine can be contacted at llevine@stevens.edu.

The Inquisition In Mexico

Wednesday, January 3rd, 2007

     For centuries Mexico was inhabited by a number of different Indian races. There were many native cultures in Mexico, but only six are considered to be the most influential.  The Olmecs, the Teotihuacans, the Toltecs, the Mayans, the Zapotec/Mixtec, and the Aztecs each developed during a different epoch of the history of ancient Mexico. 
      Historians date the beginning of the Colonial Period of Mexico from August 18, 1521, when a Spanish force, commanded by Hernando Cort?z, conquered the city of Tenochtitl?n (later called Mexico City), the capital of the Aztec empire. Mexico did not get its independence until 1821 and during its colonial period was known as New Spain.
      Cort?z and his conquistadores (conquerors) found Mexico to be rich in precious metals with vast expanses of arable land. In addition, the native population provided a ready source of slave labor. The possibilities for enrichment seemed almost limitless, and soon many enterprising adventurers were attracted to New Spain.
      Included among these entrepreneurs were a number of “New Christians” (Marranos, anusim), those Jews from Spain or their ancestors who had accepted baptism in order to remain there at the time of the expulsion in 1492. Others had fled from Spain to Portugal in 1492, only to be forcibly converted to Christianity in 1497.
      Some of these New Christians did become observant and devout Catholics. A considerable number, however, remained underground Jews for centuries. Outwardly they appeared to live as Catholics while they continued to practice Jewish rites and ceremonies in secret. Such Jews were mercilessly persecuted by the Inquisition in both Spain and Portugal for the “crime” of Judaizing.
      Therefore, it wasn’t just economic opportunities that attracted the anusim to Mexico. At least as important was the hope that in the New World they would be far from the suspicious eyes of the Inquisition, thus enabling them to secretly practice the religion of their ancestors without interference from their Christian neighbors. History shows they were sadly mistaken; the Inquisition would soon follow them to New Spain.
      Initially the Inquisition in Mexico functioned in a primitive manner. The bishops in their respective dioceses were made agents of the Spanish Inquisition and were given inquisitorial powers. On July 22, 1517, Don Fr. Francisco de Cisneros, archbishop of Toledo and general inquisitor of Spain, issued an order empowering all bishops in New Spain to investigate, imprison, prosecute, and punish heretics.
      Power was also given to the bishops to release to the secular authorities for capital punishment anyone convicted of Judaizing. (The Catholic Church did not actually execute those it convicted of crimes – carrying out a death sentence was left to the secular government authorities.)
      In 1571 these primitive inquisitional tribunals were replaced. Philip II, king of Spain, gave the general inquisitor of Spain, Don Diego de Espinosa, the authority to appoint Dr. Pedro Moya de Contreras as inquisitor for New Spain. Assuming his new duties shortly after his arrival in Mexico on September 12, 1571, he set about making the entire population of the colony aware that the Inquisition was in full force. On November 4, 1571, an impressive ceremony in the Cathedral of Mexico City was held in the presence of the entire population of the city.
      Everyone twelve years of age and older had been summoned the day before by town criers to assist in inaugurating the founding of a Holy Office in New Spain. All those present were required to agree under oath that they would not tolerate heretics. They had to swear they would denounce to the Holy Office anyone suspected of heresy. Further, they were to help persecute them as “wolves and rabid dogs.” Any individual failing to do this would himself suffer major excommunication.
      An Edict of Grace was proclaimed, admonishing those who were practicing Jewish rites and ceremonies to denounce themselves within six days. Those who did were assured that they would be treated with mercy.
      The Edict of Grace of November 4, 1571, ushered in a reign of terror and panic. Within six months, the Holy Office was busy investigating over 400 denunciations. As was often the case, most were without foundation; nonetheless, 127 persons were arrested. Preparations were soon made for the first auto-da-f?.
      Interestingly, Judaizers were not the main concern of the Mexican Holy Office. During the nearly 300 years from the conquest of Mexico to its independence from Spain, Judaizers represented only about 16 percent of all the individuals tried by the Inquisition there. There was not a single Judaizer among the victims of the first three autos-da-f?.
      The procedures employed at inquisitional “trials” are described in many publications dealing with the Spanish Inquisition. People were not told what their “crimes” were or who had accused them. Instead, they were first asked to confess their “sins.” If there was no confession or if the sins mentioned were not sufficient for a tribunal, then methods of torture were employed.
      The severity of the torture was increased until the tribunal got the confessions it sought. Only a few were able to resist this barbarous treatment. In Mexico, the methods of torture used were somewhat milder than those used in Spain.
      The property of those convicted of heresy was confiscated and turned over to the Church. This alone was sufficient motivation to bring charges against innocent people. Ostensibly, however, the main objective of the inquisitors was to get the accused to repent and return to the Catholic Church. In this way the soul of the heretic would be “saved” during his or her lifetime and for all eternity.
      Given the barbarous torture utilized by the inquisitors, it is not surprising that the great majority of accused Judaizers in Mexico (as elsewhere) eventually declared their repentance and begged for mercy. They were then condemned to appear at an auto-da-f? in order to abjure their heretical errors publicly and to hear the recitation of their sentence. The sentences ranged from loss of one’s possessions through confiscation, to prison terms, to expulsion from Mexico to Spain. It was not uncommon for public lashing to be added to this list.
      Those condemned Judaizers who had been reconciled to Catholicism were known as reconciliados. Those who were to be expelled were required to return to Spain at their own expenses. This was almost impossible, given that all their money and property had been confiscated as a result of the verdict imposed upon them. Most of those who could not pay for their trip to Spain managed to remain in Mexico illegally. After some time it was not unusual for these wretched individuals to find themselves again in trouble with the Holy Office.
      The autos-da-f? were celebrated in Mexico with extraordinary splendor. They served as great spectacles through which the Holy Office impressed the populace and satisfied its penchant for cruelty. Autos-da-f? often were held in the largest public square in Mexico City, where large platforms were erected for public viewing.
      The great majority of those to be released to the secular authorities for capital punishment appeared in the procession of the auto-da-f? with a cross in their hands. This they kissed publicly, and then recited a Catholic prayer. The reason was that one who did this was first strangled by garrotes before his corpse was burned.
      There were, among the condemned, heroes and martyrs who refused to give in. They chose to be burnt alive and have their deaths serve as a kiddush Hashem (sanctification of God’s name).


     Dr. Yitzchok Levine, a frequent contributor to The Jewish Press, is a professor in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, New Jersey. Glimpses Into American Jewish History appears the first week of each month. Dr. Levine can be contacted at llevine@stevens.edu.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/magazine/glimpses-ajh/the-inquisition-in-mexico/2007/01/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: