Countries must be ready for a higher level of potential friction with the Obama Administration.
The report warned that U.S. efforts to arm Sunni rebels could help Al Qaida militias in Syria.
One of the factors in British policy was a hope that if the Germans were flattered and treated properly, they would not be aggressive.
If chemical weapons had not been used, Damascus would have been overcome by the rebels.
The seeming end of a deal would only be the beginning of a deal.
Obama’s supporters in the media (and no doubt in Hollywood, politics, and the academy) see a light at the end of this tunnel...
These firms worked on contractual arrangements with clearance and confidentiality agreements signed with the US Department of Defense.
The bottom line is the belief that if the Muslim Brotherhood is kept happy it won’t cause any trouble.
The greatest danger for Israel would be to listen to the bad advice of Obama, Kerry, and their supporters.
We're asking U.S. troops to go into Syria without an overwhelming advantage, and without minimizing our risks.
These threats should be laughed at.
We don’t know what their thinking is on the choice between evils: the evil of intervening or the evil of failing to after defining a red line.
The Obama Administration believes that it can reconcile with Islamist states.
Why have those who govern Syria followed such a pattern for more than six decades under almost a dozen different regimes?
I’m skeptical that we have any intention of taking action against Syria – even punitive action, with no view to an outcome or end-state.
I sat there speechless. I simply couldn't believe what I was hearing.
General al-Sisi and is not about to give in to American pressure regarding the Muslim Brotherhood.
Liberty always – always – has to be deliberately established and hedged about with protections.
Lost: Obama's Middle East policy, 2013-2016.
Within hours of Morsi's departure, the streets of Cairo were awash with anti-Qatari banners accompanied by the obligatory anti-US and anti-Israel slogans.