Photo Credit: Alex Kolomoisky/POOL/FLASH90
Justice Minister Tzipi Livni (L) speaking with Finance Minister Yair Lapid at a recent cabinet meeting. Livni opposes extending protection to pregnant women, Jewish and Arab, in Judea and Samaria from being fired.

Israeli negotiator Tzipi Livni is opposing a legislative move to protect women, Jews and Arabs, in Judea and Samaria who are pregnant or are on maternity leave from being fired because doing might be interpreted as de facto annexation of Jewish communities.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu promised on Sunday that the law protecting the rights of women in the rest of Israel will also apply to women in Judea and Samaria. The Cabinet Ministerial Committee previously has approved the bill.

Advertisement

Livni, always one of the first to speak for women’s rights when it is convenient for her, is worried that the law, if passed, might affect the secret talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. PA chairman Mahmoud Abbas could interpret a legislative change as intentional move towards Israeli sovereignty.

She has support from Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, who has come out against Knesset’s applying the law, proposed by Jewish Home Knesset Member Orit Struck. They ignored the fact that the Knesset already has applied specific laws to residents of Judea and Samaria at least a dozen times.

As it stands now, Israeli companies and government offices in Judea and Samaria can fire women if they are about to give birth or are on maternity leave.

Equal rights, especially those for women, normally would be an unquestioned principle, but when it comes to “settlers,” everything goes upside down.

At least two Yesh Atid ministers also object, and Livni and Weinstein want the change to come through a military order.

Weinstein  argues that previous Knesset laws for Judea and Samaria were of a “personal” nature. Women’s maternity rights apparently are political, not personal, according to the Attorney General.

Legitimate feminists, and not opportunist feminists like Livni, put their principles above politics, even if they are left-wingers.

Labor MK Merav Michaeli, a strongly feminist activist, backs Strucks’s bill. “First and foremost I think every country should regulate companies owned by its citizens to protect human and workers’ rights wherever it operates,” Michaeli explained. “Both international law and human rights organizations agree today that rights should be protected as much as possible, also under occupation.

“Approval of the law is an appropriate and normal step that finally recognizes that human rights in general, and women’s rights in specific, should not stop at the Green Line.”

Advertisement

16 COMMENTS

  1. I am asking for a longest time: why is Livni in the government? In the view of arabs there is no disputed territory; all Eretz Yisrael belongs to Islam. So I do not think that we need "leaders" that totally, or partially, agree with with this arabian opinion.

  2. Interesting. As someone employed by a city council over the Green Line, it took my boss two years to fire an under-performing worker due to her pregnancies and maternity leave. I know she consulted with the in-house counsel and I imagine she would have canned her sooner if she could…

  3. well livni is correct in one thing that all humans were created equal, "as we came naked into the world and naked shall we return." but in the meantime, it is man who make women pregnant, so they should have the same rights as men in the workforce.

  4. this makes no sense. Arab workers make up a large part of the work force over the green line. Wouldn’t this law also protect them? Why is Livni against Muslim females, who get so little respect from their own people as it is?  Livni needs to be fired – she is a traitor to our mission as Jews.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...