web analytics
April 18, 2015 / 29 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

One-Third of GOP Voters See Obama Worse for US than Assad and Putin

Monday, March 30th, 2015

A Reuters online poll reveals that 34 percent of Republican voters view President Barack Obama as more of an imminent threat to the United States than Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and Russian President Vladimir Putin.

The survey asked 2,809 Americans to list countries, organizations and individuals who they think are an imminent threat to the country.

Among 1.059 Republican voters, Obama “won” hands down, nine percent points ahead of Putin and 11 points ahead of Assad.

The fact that one-third of a major party’s voters view their president as a threat to their own country would have been shocking not long ago. It is even more shocking when taking into account that so many people consider Obama more of a threat to the United States that Assad, who is allied with Iran, and Putin, who by most accounts is leading a new cold war against America.

Reuters said that sociologist Barry Glassner thinks the results are not such a surprise. The author of “The Culture of Fear: Why Americans are afraid of the wrong things” told Reuters that both the Democratic and Republican parties have capitalized on “fear mongering,” which he said will be part of the 2016 presidential campaign.

“The TV media here, and American politics, very much trade on fears,” he added.

Democrats returned the Republicans “compliment,” with 22 percent citing the GOP as in imminent threat to the United States.

The biggest threats, according to the overall poll, are terrorist attacks by the Islamic rated by 58 percent of the respondents as the most imminent threat. Next in line were Al Qaeda, cyber attacks, Korean Leader Kim Jong-un, drug trafficking and Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Russian Foreign Minister Leaves Lausanne

Monday, March 30th, 2015

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov is leaving the talks in Lausanne, Switzerland this afternoon and will return to Moscow but is ready to return if the P5+1 and Iran come to terms for a framework agreement.

Analysts are speculating that Foreign Minister Lavrov’s exit is a sign that no deal is imminent, but every opinion is up for grabs in what has become the center stage of an act that would put the world’s best novelist, Broadway producer or circus master to shame.

With all due respect to the experts who have at least a thousand words to say every time someone burps in Lausanne, only a master of evil can figure what is going in the mischievous and evil minds of Iran and Russia, one of the P5+1 powers and which has a vested interest in Iran’s nuclear development.

A Russian spokesman said that Lavrov “is ready to come back as soon as needed.”

However, his deputy will remain in Lausanne while U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and the foreign ministers of the other four Western powers face off against Iran towards tomorrow night’s deadline, which was set by President Barack Obama for a framework agreement on Tehran’s nuclear program.

After a one hour and 14 minute meeting this morning, new talks have been scheduled for 8:30 p.m., five hours later than previously planned.

Obama has said there will be no extension, but if Kerry and his colleagues see the possibility of a deal a day or two after the deadline, the president very likely would go back on his word.

Key issues dividing the two sides apparently are when sanctions would be removed and how much research and development Iran can continue.

 

 

 

 

Iran Reneges on Major Point: Will Obama Keep Begging Anyway?

Monday, March 30th, 2015

With just two days to go before a “framework” agreement must be reached between the P5+1 countries and Iran regarding the Islamic Republic’s nuclear program, the Iranians suddenly issued a surprise punch to the solar plexus of the other parties.

Despite an already agreed upon commitment, Iran will not send out of the country the enriched uranium it has spent years and billions of dollars to create.

Iran had previously agreed to send its stockpile elsewhere – Russia was the agreed-upon destination – thereby preventing Iran from using the material it had already produced to create nuclear weapons.

This latest revelation came during the current round of talks between Iran and six major world powers – Britain, France, China, Russia, the United States and Germany – taking place at the Beau Rivage Palace Hotel in Lausanne, Switzerland.

The negotiators are working to hammer out a provisional framework deal by Tuesday night, which will be followed by a final agreement this summer.

But on Sunday, March 29, Iran’s deputy foreign minister Seyed Abbas Araqchi told the Iranian media: “There is no question of sending the stocks abroad,” Agence France-Presse reported.

Given Iran’s mercurial posturing throughout the negotiations and its latest brazen reneging on a critical aspect of the deal, critics of the U.S. administration’s diplomatic efforts, including Republicans in Congress as well as several sunni Arab nations in the Middle East and also Israel, are sure to become even more vociferously opposed to the signing of any deal.

If Iran is permitted to retain its already enriched uranium, it becomes much harder to state with confidence that it is not intending to continue its march towards nuclear weaponization.

Over the weekend, U.S. Speaker of the House John Boehner told CNN that he is even less confident about Iran’s willingness to abide by any deal it reaches pertaining to its nuclear program.

“We have got a regime that’s never quite kept their word about anything,” he said. “I just don’t understand why we would sign an agreement with a group of people who, in my opinion, have no intention of keeping their word.”

For its part, Iran is upping its own demands from the rest of the world.

Iran demands that all sanctions and UN resolutions imposing crippling restrictions against Tehran be scrapped as part of its nuclear deal with major world powers, Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said.

“It is time for P5+1 to make tough decisions and to lift all sanctions,” Araqchi told journalists at the Lausanne talks.

“All six UN resolutions should be lifted,” he added.

Israel Did Not Protest Release of 1987 Nuke Report

Saturday, March 28th, 2015

Israel did not protest the release of the 1987 US Department of Defense commissioned document that summarized The US’s knowledge of Israel’s nuclear and other technical programs at the time, according to a Jerusalem Post Report.

“We did inform the Israeli government of our planned release of the documents and they did not object,” Army Col. Steven Warren, director of Pentagon press operations, confirmed to The Jerusalem Post.

The report was released due to a Freedom of Information Act request a few years earlier.

The source claims Israel was informed and did not protest the document’s release, and if Israel had protested, in writing, the report would not have been released.

Israel has not publicly commented on the report.

The timing of the release, at a time of tremendous tension between President Obama and Israel, led to speculation that the timing of the release was intentional.

Netanyahu to Release Frozen Palestinian Authority Tax Revenue

Friday, March 27th, 2015

Prime Minister Netanyahu has approved the transfer of frozen Palestinian Authority tax revenue, following the recommendations of Defense Minister Moshe Yaalon.

The tax revenue had been frozen following various unilateral steps by the Palestinian Authority in the international arena, in breach of all agreements with Israel.

Debts owed by the PA, such as for water, sewage, electricity and medical care will be deducted from the amount transferred to the PA.

The Prime Minister’s office says the decision was made based on humanitarian concerns and a broad view of Israeli interests at this time.

PM Netanyahu said that with the Middle East in turmoil, Israel must act judiciously and responsibly, along with determination against the extremists.

The Palestinian Authority has not retracted its plan to go to the International Criminal Court and charge Israelis with war crimes, or other steps against Israel in the international arena, in particular at the UN.

And the PA is still transferring money to the families of terrorists.

Releasing the funds may be an attempt to appease US President Obama, or alternatively, Israel is afraid that the PA may actually collapse, which would usher in a Hamas take over.

Information from Tazpit News Agency was used to produce this report.

Palestinian Authority School Children: Boycott Israel by Killing Jews [video]

Friday, March 27th, 2015

Palestinian Authority media and schools have escalated incitement of violence against Israel by interviewing children who justify killing Jews for the objective of boycotting Israeli products.

Of course, if the children kill all the Jews, there won’t be any Israeli products to boycott, and that is precisely the point.

Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) translated and published a video of an official PA broadcast of a Hebron school’s theater activity aimed at promoting a boycott against Israel.

One charming boy, with a kefiyeh headdress, said:

I came to rehearse the play in order to boycott Israeli products and fight the Jews, kill them, and defeat them. The goal is to boycott Israeli products.

A PA television reporter explained to anyone, such as the U.S. State Dept., who might not understand what was going on, “Instilling the culture of boycotting occupation products in the hearts of children and adolescents was the goal that led the Ministry of Education to place this issue at the center of all school activities throughout the homeland… Through creative activities, [students] expressed different views about support for national products and resistance through boycott.

It is no wonder that Palestinian Authority children think the way do. PMW pointed out that the Palestinian Authority Ministry of Education last year “held a sporting event named after a terrorist who placed a bomb in a refrigerator in the center of Jerusalem, murdering 15 and injuring 60.”

Also last year, “The Minister of Culture last year presented an award at a cultural event to Egyptian poet Hesham El-Gakh after he read his poem with the words ‘our enemy is Zion, Satan with a tail.'”

The head of the PA Sports Authority sponsored a ping-pong tournament named after Dalal Mughrabi, who led a bus hijacking that ended with the murder of 37 Israelis.

Boycotting Israel justifies killing Jews, ping-pong honors terror, poetry is awarded for defining Zion as Satan, athletic events memorialize terrorists, and the Obama administration insists that peace will come to Israel when it runs out of Judea and Samaria and half of Jerusalem.

President Obama has to think that way. Otherwise, how could he justify sending American taxpayers’ dollars to the PA?

Obama: Netanyahu has to Prove He Supports Two State Solution

Thursday, March 26th, 2015

Once again at the U.S. State Department briefing on Wednesday, March 25, the issue of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s statement regarding the feasibility of creating a Palestinian State during the current period of extreme unrest in the region was a topic.

The issue was raised by Bradley Klapper, of the Associated Press. Klapper asked it of Jen Psaki, whose last day it was as the current State Department Spokesperson.

Bradley Klapper of the Associated Press

Bradley Klapper of the Associated Press

Psaki is leaving the State Department. On April 1 she will begin her new position as the White House communications director. Psaki formerly served as a press secretary to then-senator Barack Obama during his first presidential campaign, and worked in the White House as a deputy communications director.

Klapper was piggy-backing on the briefing room lobbyist for the Palestinian Authority, Said Arikat, who writes for Al Quds newspaper.

Arikat said that during President Obama’s press conference on Tuesday with Afghan President Ashraf Ghani, Obama mentioned “the importance of having a process, a framework, that will lead, ultimately to a two-state solution.”

Arikat.jpgArikat then, as he does so often, prodded for a timetable for a return to the “negotiating table” to impose a Palestinian State on the region.

Psaki, however, demurred, pointing out that Israel had just gone through elections and was in the process of forming its new government. Arikat halfheartedly pushed a bit more, raised several other points ostensibly posed as questions, but barely masking his perpetual attempt to create policy sound bites by repeating words he likes strung together.

At the end of this little soft-shoe duet, AP’s Klapper chooses to pursue Arikat’s point (no doubt to the great delight of Arikat). Klapper referred back to Obama’s Tuesday press conference with Afghanistan’s Ghani. Klapper claimed that the president said he supports the two-state solution, “but that the prime minister thinks otherwise.”

Klapper asked Psaki to explain the government’s understanding regarding Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu’s position on a two-state solution.

The State Department spokesperson, as if she were already speaking for President Obama, ticked off that Netanyahu made some statements before the election and some after, obviously suggesting that Netanyahu had become inconsistent regarding his support for the creation of a Palestinian State.

Psaki said: “We have to see if there is actually a path to make the hard choices towards negotiations, and we don’t know the answer to that yet. So we’ll be looking for actions and policies that demonstrate genuine commitment.”

Klapper, seeking to clarify Psaki’s diplospeak, suggested that what the president was saying, was that the U.S. government no longer is sure whether Israel’s Netanyahu supports a two-state solution.

And then comes the kicker, with Klapper suggesting what Obama is really saying about Netanyahu’s support for a two-state solution: “He has to prove that, essentially.”

To which Psaki responds: “Correct.”

In a room in which there is rarely, and even then, only briefly, any challenges made to the Palestinian Authority’s commitment to living side by side with Israel in peace and security, or any calls for there to be a cessation of the glorification of terrorism and murder of Israeli citizens, the State Department briefing room instead doubles as a star chamber for the Jewish State.

Your tax dollars at work.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/obama-netanyahu-has-to-prove-he-supports-two-state-solution/2015/03/26/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: