Communicated: TefillaChillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.
tell a friendIn his State of the Union speech two weeks ago, President Obama seemed to echo his predecessor’s extravagant “Mission Accomplished” declaration respecting the war in Iraq when he announced that in light of the substantial gains in the fight against the Taliban in Afghanistan, some 34,000 U.S. troops will return home by this time next year.
In terms of percentages, it will mean that half of the 66,000 U.S. soldiers will return home. And a senior administration official told CNN that reductions will continue through the end of 2014. Unfortunately, recent reports suggest that in fact the war in Afghanistan has been a failure and the latest evidence that the U.S. has not learned how to counter modern indigenous movements like the Taliban. Analysts are positing that modern technological developments in military power such as drones may provide a key part of the answer and permit us to play to our strengths in future conflicts.
A startling report two weeks ago in The New York Times provided a very different perspective from that of the president. Titled “U.S. Military Faces Fire as It Pulls Out of Afghanistan” it painted a picture reminiscent of the scene when U.S. personnel were spirited out of Saigon as the U.S. war effort in Vietnam collapsed.
The Times story was concerned the American withdrawal from an outpost in Southern Afghanistan on the same day President Obama announced the withdrawals:
They [the Americans] were leaving this violent patch of land outside Kandahar, the south’s main city, just as Taliban fighters were filtering back in from winter havens in Pakistan….
The Americans knew they would be most vulnerable in their final hours after taking down their surveillance and early-warning systems. The Taliban knew it, too, and intelligence reports indicated that they had been working with sympathetic villagers to strike at the departing soldiers.
The report went on to quote an American commander responsible for the nearby Zhare district as to how there are areas where “the Taliban can find sanctuary, and we still believe there is an informal network or support structure in place they can rely on.”
Plainly, the Taliban are an integral part of the landscape and can come and go with relative impunity even after a firefight temporarily gives U.S. forces and their Afghan allies temporary control of a particular piece of territory. Bringing even the full weight of U.S. military power to bear cannot be the enduring solution to insurgencies like that of the Taliban.
As this reality becomes starker, it is not surprising that Afghan President Hamid Karzai seems to be reconsidering his options and seeking peace talks with the Taliban. And he is receiving gentle pushes from his Western allies who also seem to see the handwriting on the wall. A Feb. 16 New York Times report delivered the depressing news:
Frozen for months last year as another fighting season raged in Afghanistan, and as election-year politics consumed U.S. attention, diplomats and political leaders from eight countries are now mounting the most concerted campaign to date to bring the Afghan government and its Taliban foes together to negotiate a peace deal….
Yet so far the energized reach for peace has achieved little, officials say, except to cement a growing consensus that regional stability demands some sort of political settlement with the Taliban – after a war that cost tens of thousands of Afghan and Western lives and nearly a trillion dollars failed to put down the insurgency.
Interviews with more than two dozen officials involved in the effort suggest a fast-spinning process that has yet to gain traction and seems to have little chance of achieving even its most limited goal: bringing the Afghan government and Taliban leadership together at the table before the bulk of the U.S. fighting force leaves Afghanistan in 2014.
Does anyone really believe the Afghan military alone can do what proved unachievable with massive U.S. assistance?
Mr. Karzai seems to think not, and in addition seems to feel it is in his long-term interests to make concessions to the Taliban even in advance of public discussions. Small wonder that last week he barred U.S. special forces troops from operating in the strategic province of Maidan Wardak, which adjoins the capital of Kabul and which is crucial to defending Kabul against the Taliban.
tell a friendAbout the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/when-all-else-fails-are-drones-the-answer/2013/02/27/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online:
print
Loading ...
Amazing video captures the angst folks have about domestic drone deployment…
“Seagulls”
http://vimeo.com/59689349
Published Feb 2013.
Emmy-winning journalist, Shad Olson, explores the controversy over U.S. drone policy, both at home and abroad.
While technological sky supremacy gives America strategic superiority on the battlefield, the prospect of drone proliferation over U.S. cities is causing concern about loss of privacy, an end to Habeas Corpus and judicial due process and the destruction of Constitutional rights.
South Dakota U.S. Senator John Thune and former U.S. Senate candidate, Sam Kephart share their views about the consequences of domestic drone deployment in the fight against terrorism.
Originally aired on KNBN-TV, (NBC) NewsCenter1, Rapid City, South Dakota in February 2013.