web analytics
August 1, 2014 / 5 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Visiting IDF bases and receiving briefings from IDF officers. Ultimate Mission – November 2014

Don’t miss this opportunity to explore Israel off the beaten track, feel the conflict first hand, understand the security issues and politic realities, and have an unforgettable trip!



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Jimmy Carter – Polemist-In-Chief


Former presidents hold a place like no other politicians in a democracy. Regardless of their politics, they are honored for their service. And their choice of activities after their presidencies immediately raises the profile of the debate and calls us to arms for good causes.

Being an ex-president is a very important job with great power and prestige.

That is why Jimmy Carter’s decision to abandon his responsibility and descend into the muck of anti-Israel propaganda is not only sad, it is dangerous. With his book Palestine Peace Not Apartheid, Carter trades on his prestige to become Polemist in Chief.

Why does it matter? Simply put, because people may believe and follow him.

People write crazy things all the time. When Ann Coulter attacks the widows of 9/11 victims or a moviemaker fantasizes about assassinating President Bush, we are tempted to simply lament the bottom feeders and continue on our way.

But when a former president makes up facts and laments the “apartheid” of Israel and blames the “Jewish lobby” for the continuing terror in the Middle East, many observers give the charges the credibility they don’t deserve.

Recently, Carter traveled to Brandeis to engage in what he claimed would be a discussion about the points in his book. Rather than submit to an actual dialogue, however, the former president hid behind pre-screened questions and did not allow for a free-flowing discussion about the peace process.

At Brandeis, Mr. Carter claimed Israelis do not “permit the Palestinians to exercise their basic human and political rights.” Even a cursory understanding of the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict proves that not to be the case. On at least four occasions, the Israelis have offered the Palestinians a state of their own.

Most recently, with President Clinton at Camp David, Yasir Arafat simply walked away from the table, choosing a campaign of terror over the hard work required to establish a working Palestinian nation.

Those views are reflected in the book itself. On pgs 51-52, Carter claims that important provisions of the Camp David Accords have not been honored. “The Israelis have never granted any appreciable autonomy to the Palestinians,” Carter writes in an attempt to illustrate his point. Carter omits that the PLO and Yasir Arafat opposed autonomy at the time, and that the Israelis have pulled out of Gaza unilaterally and 40% of the West Bank, ceding control to the Palestinian Authority.

At the same speech at Brandeis, Carter charged that Israeli policy – West Bank checkpoints, security fence, etc. – “makes the lives of Palestinians almost intolerable.” That is putting the cart before the horse. It was the Palestinians’ continuing terror campaign against the Israelis that forced them to employ checkpoints and build a wall. If the terror had ended, the wall would never have been built.

And while Carter took the occasion of his speech at Brandeis to concede that his use of the word “apartheid” in the title might cause offense, his decision to equate the treatment of Palestinians with the racist policies of South Africa turns history on its head. It is the Israelis who have for years faced attack from every border and who have repeatedly offered to make peace. It is the Palestinians, so bent on the destruction of Israel, who have walked away from the table and chosen to attack Israeli civilians rather than engage in the much more difficult task of governing themselves and building a peaceful existence in the Middle East.

But Jimmy Carter is more than guilty of overstatement and being plain wrong. He is guilty of anti-Semitism. When he rails against the power of the pro-Israel lobby and nods his agreement when the host of “Meet the Press” asks if he thinks “the Jewish lobby” is to blame for the ills of the region, he puts power and respectability behind the same language that anti-Semites have been using from time immemorial.

Thanks to Carter, it is no longer difficult to imagine David Duke defending his views by quoting a former president of the United States of America.

In the gutter that is popular media, we have another sad entry.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Jimmy Carter – Polemist-In-Chief”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
A Palestinian showing the money he withdrew from an ATM in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip.
10:03am Cease Fire Broken, Collect Your Bets (Latest Alert: 12:30pm)
Latest Indepth Stories
Hamas' leader Ismail Haniyeh and Erdogan. Haniyeh is the terrorist on the left.

Qatar’s wealth and Turkey’s size should not preclude us from telling it as it is: Qatar and Turkey are among the worst villains in the Gaza tragedy.

Parliament_House,New_Delhi

New Delhi would do well to remain aware of the predicament of Israel today.

120px-Hrw_logo

HRW “investigations” reflect anti-Israel bias, lack of research, and flat-out fabrications.

Borenstein-080114

his Tisha B’Av, and this Tu B’Av, remember: Hashem will protect us if we unite and rally around Him

Israel’s morality is underscored by its unprecedented restraint and care for loss of life.

The Gazan octopus arm is a test case, as the rest of the arms are closely watching it.

Obama has chosen shaky ally on the way out over strong ally solidly in the American orbit.

Where is the outrage against Hamas ..?

When will the world realize, by the grace of Gd, we are here to stay?

World War I had sown chaos throughout the centuries-old Jewish communities of Eastern Europe.

The IDF pounding continued and it again seemed only a matter of time before Hamas would be forced to accept the Egyptian proposal.

Nothing is ever so clear in the complex and often brutal calculus of urban warfare.

For breaking his oath of allegiance, Tzidkiyahu was forced to witness the death of his sons before he himself was blinded and exiled to Babylon.

ISIS poses a great threat to the entire civilized world in general and liberal democracies in particular.

More Articles from Congressman Anthony Weiner

Former presidents hold a place like no other politicians in a democracy. Regardless of their politics, they are honored for their service. And their choice of activities after their presidencies immediately raises the profile of the debate and calls us to arms for good causes.

For years, Israel’s critics have excoriated the Jewish state’s plans to build a temporary barrier on its border with the West Bank.

It was counterproductive, they would say. It would not protect Israelis, and it would cause undue hardship for Palestinians.

Last week, the critics were proven wrong.

One moderate Muslim voice, a brave Bangladeshi journalist, has withstood years of unfair persecution in Dhaka for supporting Israel. He’s been jailed and beaten, and as he now prepares to stand trial for his life, it’s time for the world community to act.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?

    • Yes, it was a direct order from Obama and Kerry's to hurt Israel into submission. (46%, 962 Votes)

    • Yes, Obama and Kerry gave the FAA a "hint" to to hurt Israel into submission. (18%, 376 Votes)

    • Yes, it was simply understood from the administration's anti-Israel atmosphere. (9%, 199 Votes)

    • No, it was a professional decision for the safety of US citizens. (18%, 378 Votes)

    • No, it was simply an unprofessional decision by unthinking bureaucrats. (9%, 182 Votes)

    Total Voters: 2,097

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/jimmy-carter-polemist-in-chief-2/2007/01/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: