web analytics
May 29, 2015 / 11 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Here, Take it!


Business-Halacha-logo

The Golds were planning a two-week vacation. Mrs. Gold did not want to travel with her jewelry, but was concerned about leaving it in their apartment while they traveled.

“What should we do with my jewelry?” Mrs. Gold asked her husband. “I’m afraid to leave it unattended in the apartment. There has been a rash of robberies recently in the building.”

“We could hide the jewelry in one of the closets,” suggested Mr. Gold.

“I’m not happy with that,” said Mrs. Gold. “If a thief searches the apartment, he still might find it. We’ll be away for two weeks.”

“If you’re comfortable, we can leave the jewelry with our neighbors, the Ehrlichs,” said Mr. Gold. “They have a safe in their apartment.”

“That would be much better,” said Mrs. Gold. “I would feel more secure knowing the jewelry was stowed away.”

Mr. Gold called the Ehrlichs and asked if he could bring over some valuables to put in their safe while they would be away on vacation.

“That’s fine,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “We’ll be happy to keep it for you in our safe. It’s not such a big safe, though, so focus on the smaller items.”

Mrs. Gold gathered together the valuable jewelry she wasn’t planning to take and put it in a bag. Mr. Gold brought it over to the Ehrlichs. He quickly showed Mr. Ehrlich the contents: some necklaces, earrings, rings, and some gold pins. Then he knotted the bag carefully and gave it to Mr. Ehrlich to put in his safe.

“Have a safe trip,” Mr. Ehrlich wished Mr. Gold. “Enjoy your vacation!”

When the Golds returned two weeks later, Mr. Gold went to retrieve the bag of jewelry from the Ehrlichs. Mr. Ehrlich took the bag out of the safe.

“Thank you very much,” said Mr. Gold.

“No problem at all,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “We were happy to help.”

Mr. Gold took the bag and untied it. He perused the contents. With a concerned look, he said: “Would you mind if I examined the contents before retuning home?”

“You’re welcome to,” said Mr. Ehrlich, “but I assure you that nobody touched the bag while you were gone.”

Mr. Gold took out the items one by one. “There was also a golden pin with a diamond tip that is missing!” he said.

“I have no idea whether there was or wasn’t such a pin,” said Mr. Ehrlich in an offended tone. “I didn’t examine the contents of the bag carefully when you gave it to me. I assure you, though, that whatever you gave is what you got back!”

“But I’m sure the pin was in the bag,” said Mr. Gold softly. “You’re obligated in a Torah oath of modeh b’miktzas, partial admission.”

Mr. Ehrlich paled. “I’m not swearing any such oath,” he said.

“Then you’ll have to pay,” said Mr. Gold. “We’re going to have to take this up with Rabbi Dayan.”

Mr. Gold and Mr. Ehrlich met with Rabbi Dayan. “I gave Mr. Ehrlich a bag of jewelry to keep in his safe and a diamond-tipped pin is missing from the bag,” said Mr. Gold. “He doesn’t know whether he received the pin but claims he returned the bag intact. Is this not a case of modeh b’miktzas, partial admission?”

“At first glance, it might seem so,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “Mr. Ehrlich admits to having received a bag of jewelry, but denies having received that pin in the bag. As such, he would be obligated in a Torah oath to deny the claim.”

“However,” continued Rabbi Dayan, “the truth is that Mr. Ehrlich is not required a Torah oath.”

“Why not?” asked Mr. Gold.

“There is a significant exception to the rule of partial admission known as heilech, ‘Here, take it,’ ” answered Rabbi Dayan. “If the defendant admits partially, but is prepared to return the admitted items – or to pay immediately in beis din the sum that he admits – we do not view the case as one of partial admission; he is not required the Torah oath of partial admission.” (C.M. 87:1; 88:24)

“I don’t quite follow the logic,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “Why should that make a difference?”

“Since Mr. Ehrlich returned the remaining jewelry, the entire litigation revolves only around the golden brooch,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “Mr. Gold claims he entrusted a brooch; Mr. Ehrlich denies it. Thus, there is no partial admission of the litigation claim. At most, Mr. Gold would be obligated in a rabbinic oath.” (See also C.M. 88:23.)

“When would there be a case of partial admission?” asked Mr. Gold.

“Only if the defendant admits owing but is not in position to pay immediately,” said Rabbi Dayan. “Then the litigation relates to the entire amount, to which he admits partially.” (See Shach 87:3.)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Here, Take it!”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
What's happened to NYC's Celebrate Israel Parade?
Israel Rejects as ‘False’ UJA Federation’s Claims about Israel Parade ‘Inclusion’
Latest Judaism Stories
Torat-Hakehillah-logo-NEW

What if someone would come to you and offer you everything that is desirable in this world, but with one condition: you have to give up your essence.

Rabbi Avi Weiss

Torah learning is valueless unless it enhances personal morality, fostering closer connection to God

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

Why did so many of our great sages from the Rambam to Rabbi Moshe Feinstein live outside Israel?

Daf-Yomi-logo

Casting A Doubt
‘Shall We Say [They] Are Not Valid?’
(Nedarim 5a-7a)

I was about six years old at the time and recall that very special occasion so well.

Question: Should we wash our hands in the bathroom with soap and water, or by pouring water from a vessel with handles three times, alternating hands? I have heard it said that a vessel is used only in the morning upon awakening. What are the rules pertaining to young children? What is the protocol if no vessel is available? Additionally, may we dry our hands via an electric dryer?

Harry Koenigsberg
(Via E-Mail)

Why was Samson singled out as the only Shofet required to be a nazir from cradle to grave?

“What do you mean?” asked the secretary. “We already issued a ruling and closed the case.”

Tosafos suggests several answers as to how a minor can own an item, m’d’Oraisa.

This week’s video discusses the important connection between the Priestly Blessing and parenting.

Many of us simply don’t get the need for the Torah to list the exact same gift offering, 12 times!

There is a great debate as to whether this story actually took place or is simply a metaphor, a prophetic vision shown to Hoshea by Hashem.

Every person is presented with moments when he/she must make difficult decisions about how to proceed.

One does not necessarily share the opinions of one’s brother. One may disapprove of his actions, values, and/or beliefs. However, with brothers there is a bond of love and caring that transcends all differences.

This Shavuot let’s give G-d a gift too: Let’s make this year different by doing just 1 more mitzvah

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-NEW

“What do you mean?” asked the secretary. “We already issued a ruling and closed the case.”

Business-Halacha-NEW

“A person who borrowed without a written loan document, even in the presence of witnesses, is believed with a heses – rabbinic – oath to say that he repaid,”

During the course of the year, though, political events in the Persian Gulf caused the cost of gasoline to rise. Prices climbed from $2.50 a gallon to $4.00.

“There is a diamond necklace that I wear on special occasions,” Mrs. Miller told her husband. “It was recently appraised at $6,000. If need be, we can give that as collateral.”

“I accept the ruling,” said Mr. Broyer, “but would like to understand the reasoning.”

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/here-take-it/2013/02/27/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: