web analytics
September 16, 2014 / 21 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
Apartment 758x530 Africa-Israel at the Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York

Africa Israel Residences, part of the Africa Israel Investments Group led by international businessman Lev Leviev, will present 7 leading projects on the The Israel Real Estate Exhibition in New York on Sep 14-15, 2014.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Perpetuating Har Sinai

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

The Torah warns us to not forget the revelation that we witnessed at Har Sinai, for as the pasuk in Parshas Va’eschanan says: “Only beware for yourself and greatly beware for your soul, lest you forget the things that your eyes have seen and lest you remove them from your heart all the days of your life, and make them known to your children and your children’s children” (Devarim 4:9).

There seems to be several different interpretations of this pasuk. The Mishnah in Pirkei Avos (3:8) says that anyone who forgets what he has learned is considered to be deserving of death. The Mishnah quotes the abovementioned pasuk as a reference. Similarly the Gemara in Menachos 99b says in the name of Reish Lakish that someone who forgets what he has learned has transgressed the lav of the aforementioned pasuk. The Gemara explains that since the pasuk used the words “hi’shamer” and “pen,” this pasuk constitutes a negative commandment.

The Gemara in Kiddushin 30a derives from this pasuk that one who learns Torah with his son’s son is considered to have received the Torah at Har Sinai.

However, at the same time, the literal translation of the pasuk is that we should not forget what we saw on Har Sinai. How does the literal translation lend itself to the prohibition of not forgetting one’s learning and praising one who learns with his grandchildren?

Another point of discussion is whether the lav of not forgetting the revelation that we witnessed at Har Sinai is on the list of the 613 mitzvos. The Rambam does not include this in his list of negative commandments. The Ramban, in his commentary to the Rambam’s Sefer Hamitzvos (in the section of the prohibitions that the Rambam neglected to count, in mitzvah 2), writes that this pasuk serves as a prohibition for one to forget ma’amad Har Sinai and that the Rambam neglected to count it. According to the Ramban, if one forgets the revelation that we witnessed at Har Sinai he has transgressed a lav.

The sefer, Megillas Esther (commentary to the Ramban’s commentary to the Rambam’s Sefer Hamitzvos), explains that the Rambam did not count as a negative commandment to forget the revelation that we witnessed at Har Sinai because he understood that the pasuk is referring to forgetting the Torah one has learned. This opinion is shared by other Rishonim, such as the Yereim (359) and the Sefer Mitzvos Ketanos (96), who posit that there is no negative commandment to forget ma’amad Har Sinai; rather, the pasuk is only prohibiting the forgetting of the Torah that one has learned – as the Mishnah in Avos and Gemara in Menachos mention. The sefer, Megillas Esther, explains that the Rambam did not count the prohibition to not forget one’s learning as a separate mitzvah, for it is part of the mitzvah of learning Torah.

The question still remains on how to reconcile all of the different drashos that are derived from this pasuk. The truth is that the Ramban actually asks this question on himself. He says that one should not be mistaken and think that the Gemara in Kiddushin 30a, which praises one who learns Torah with his grandchildren, based on this pasuk, understands that this pasuk is only referring to learning Torah and not remembering matan Torah. The Ramban explains that the Gemara is referring to learning about emunas haTorah (belief in the Torah), which is learning Torah as well.

Perhaps the explanation of these words is as follows: There is another aspect to the mitzvah of learning Torah. Aside from learning Torah, one must acquire emunas haTorah, believing that our Torah is the word of God that we received on Har Sinai. It is regarding the second aspect of the mitzvah that the Gemara in Kiddushin says that one who learns with his grandchildren is considered to have personally accepted the Torah on Har Sinai. This is because when one learns Torah with his grandfather, he is learning with someone from one generation closer to Har Sinai. This will instill in him a greater sense of emunas haTorah. This learning has both aspects of the mitzvah in it. Therefore, the Gemara reveres a grandfather who teaches Torah to his grandchildren; it’s as if he has accepted the Torah on Har Sinai.

Earlier in this mitzvah, the Ramban explained that the importance of the mitzvah to not forget Har Sinai is due to securing our belief in the Torah. He explains that if we would believe that our Torah came from any other source – even from a navi – it would not be the same secure belief and thus our belief could be challenged. This is because another navi could then come along and discredit the Torah, creating doubt in our minds. But now that we know that the Torah was given by Hashem to millions of people, no doubt could ever arise in our minds since we were the ones who witnessed Hashem’s act of giving us the Torah.

It is not a contradiction that we derive both points – that one should not forget his learning, and praising a grandfather who teaches Torah to his grandchildren – from the pasuk that literally says that we should remember the revelation that we witnessed on Har Sinai. This is because these are all aspects of the mitzvah of learning Torah. According to the Ramban, the aspect of not forgetting what we witnessed on Har Sinai identifies itself as a separate mitzvah while the other Rishonim consider it as part of the mitzvah of learning Torah.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Perpetuating Har Sinai”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The Iron Dome was called on for the first time in 2013 to intercept a missile fired by terrorists in Sinai at Eilat.
Iron Dome: Israel Ends the Long Battlefield Reign of the Missile
Latest Judaism Stories
15th century Book of the Torah

This week’s parsha offers a new covenant; a covenant that speaks to national life unlike any other

Leff-091214

All Jews are inherently righteous and that is why we all have a portion in the World to Come.

Grunfeld-Raphael-logo

If mourning is incompatible with Yom Tov, why is it not incompatible with Shabbat?

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

How can the Torah expect me today, thousands of years after the mitzvahs were given, to view each mitzvah as if I’m fulfilling it for the first time?

Torah isn’t a theological treatise or a metaphysical system but a series of stories linked over time

In contrast to her Eicha-like lamentations of the previous hour or more, however, my youngest was now grinning from ear-to-ear.

An Astonishing Miracle
‘Why Bring the Infants to Hakhel?’
(Chagigah 3a)

Question: I recently loaned money to a friend who has been able to repay only part of it. This was an interest-free loan. We exchanged a signed IOU, not a proper shtar with witnesses, since I have always trusted her integrity and only wanted a document that confirms what was loaned and what was repaid. Now that shemittah is approaching, what should I do? Should I forgive the loan? And if my friend is not able to repay it, may I deduct the unpaid money from my ma’aser requirement?

Name Withheld

e are in a time of serious crisis and must go beyond our present levels of chesed.

According to Ibn Ezra, the Torah was stressing through this covenant that hypocrisy was forbidden.

“Tony said that the code in most places in the U.S. is at least 36 inches for a residential guardrail,” replied Mr. Braun. “Some make it higher, 42, or even 52 inches for high porches. What is the required height according to halacha?”

Simcha is total; sahs is God’s joy in protecting us even when we are most vulnerable.

Not only do we accept You as our King, it is our greatest desire that the name of Your Kingdom be spread throughout the entire universe.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Since it is a Rabbinic prohibition we may follow the more lenient opinion.

They ask, how can Rabbeinu Gershom forbid marrying more than one wife, when the Torah explicitly permits it in this parshah?

First, how could a beis din of 23 judges present a guilty verdict in a capital punishment case? After all, only a majority of the 23 judges ruled in favor of his verdict.

According to Rabbi Yishmael one was not permitted to eat such an animal prior to entering Eretz Yisrael, while according to Rabbi Akiva one was permitted to eat animals if he would perform nechirah.

Tosafos there takes issue with Rashi’s view that the letters that are formed in the knots of the tefillin are considered part of the name of Hashem.

The Rambam says that in order to honor Shabbos, one must wash his hands, face, and feet with warm water on Friday.

The talmid is not allowed to speak up due to any fear. If he remains silent, he is in violation of this prohibition.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/perpetuating-har-sinai/2014/06/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: