web analytics
May 24, 2013 /15 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Settlements, Obama, And The European Union

tell a friend

The Hamas bluster about having bested Israel in Operation Pillar of Defense should not be dismissed as typical Arab hyperbole.

To be sure, Hamas leaders well know what really happened. According to a study issued by The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, Israel confounded Hamas’s military at every turn, killed its military leader and much of its officer hierarchy and also destroyed most of its strategic assets. And the performance of the Iron Dome anti-missile system and Israel’s overall civilian defense also proved impressive.

Yet Hamas officials are peddling the notion that Israel’s decision not to invade Gaza was the direct result of Hamas’s fierce resistance – despite the fact that Israel achieved its declared goals through the use of targeted air and naval power.

But there is method to their madness. And there is a message for President Obama and the European Union.

Hamas’s claims of victory necessarily tend to diminish the stature and influence of PA President Mahmoud Abbas, who conceived and last month followed through on the UN General Assembly statehood effort. And while Mr. Abbas was hailed in the Palestinian street after his success at the UN, no one paying attention to the West Bank and Gaza can doubt that Hamas has hit on a winning strategy.

So what Hamas has to say about the Israeli- Palestinian conflict has to be listened to very carefully. And the speech Hamas leader Khaled Mashal gave in Gaza last Saturday was ominous. He reiterated his movement’s refusal to “give up one inch of the land of Palestine” and went on to declare that

Palestine from the river to the sea, from the north to the south, is our land and we will never give up one inch or any part of it…. Palestine was, still is and will always be Arab and Islamic. Palestine belongs to us and to no one else. We can never recognize the legitimacy of the Israeli occupation of Palestine. Palestine belongs to us, and not to the Zionists…. Jihad and armed resistance are the right and real way to liberate Palestine and restore our rights…. Liberating Palestine, all of Palestine, is the duty and right and goal of all Arabs and Muslims….

He also declared that the “right of return” for Palestinian refugees was “sacred” and that Jerusalem was “our eternal capital, which we will liberate inch by inch, neighborhood by neighborhood and stone by stone.”

Even if Mr. Abbas were someone who could be taken at his word (a dubious notion in itself) when he says he is interested in negotiating a settlement with Israel, it is hard to conceive of his being able to deliver, given Hamas’s principles. This is certainly so inasmuch as it is common knowledge that if Israel were to withdraw from any part of the West Bank as part of a peace deal, Hamas would quickly move in and take control as it did in Gaza.

Ironically, if anything, Mr. Abbas’s UN foray added to his problems in this regard. His claim to have succeeded in securing recognition of a Palestinian state via the adoption of the resolution he submitted to the General Assembly will make it impossible to move forward with any negotiations. As we noted last week, that resolution codifies pre-1967 lines. How can he then argue that Palestinians should accept anything less? Of course, this would preclude any negotiations.

Indeed, it will be recalled that Mr. Abbas was highly critical of President Obama over the president’s calling for and then backing off a total settlement freeze: “It was Obama who suggested a full settlement freeze. I said OK. I accept. We both went up the tree. After that he came down with the ladder and he removed the ladder and said to me, jump. Three times he did it.”

Just as he was then precluded from asking for anything less than the American president, he is now similarly proscribed. Therefore, this is no time to pressure Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians in order to bring them to the negotiating table.

tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


one comment so far

You must log in to post a comment.

One Response to “Settlements, Obama, And The European Union”

  1. michaelackerman56 says:

    Please, do not confuse President Obama with logic.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich
Rep. John Conyers Apologizes for Louis Farrakhan’s Antisemitic Remarks
Latest Indepth Stories
Al-Dura_Postage_Stamp

France 2 and Enderlin must have their press accreditation revoked and be thrown out of Israel.

Palestinian kindergarten children enacting a military operation.

Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families.

Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has said he will never recognize a Jewish state and there will be no Jews allowed in a Palestinian State.

parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.

Member of Knesset Moshe Feiglin (Likud).

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated.

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.

More Articles from Editorial Board

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.

We were dismayed by the announcement last week from Google that it was changing the name “Palestinian Territories” to “Palestine” across its products. In explaining the action, a Google spokesman said that “We consult a number of sources and authorities when naming countries…. In this case, we are following the lead of the UN, ICANN (the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), ISO (International Organization for Standardization) and other international organizations.”

It seems clear that there is a lot more to the current developments regarding Syria than Israel’s bombing some sites there, though staunching the flow of Iranian weapons to Hizbullah through Syria is plainly a significant objective.

Secretary of State John Kerry’s recent embrace of the Arab Peace Initiative is, to say the least, unnerving. Certainly the response of Arab leaders to his action reflects the dangers for Israel inherent in the plan. President Obama seems to be preoccupied these days with Syria and Iran as well as serious domestic issues and is largely leaving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to Mr. Kerry. But the secretary of state seems poised to roil things up without any prospect of real progress.

Syria’s civil war is fast becoming one of the Obama administration’s greatest foreign policy challenges, for the moment even surpassing Iran’s march toward nuclear weaponry in its urgency. Together, both issues have effectively derailed the president’s long-range intention to focus on Asia and the emerging economic and military developments in China and other nations in the so-called Asian Pivot.

The investigation into the Boston bombings is still in its early stages but what seems to be emerging is that the presumed perpetrators were not directly linked to any foreign terrorist infrastructure. Rather, they were individual Americans radicalized by jihadist teachings and guided in their weapons-making by jihadist websites.

    Latest Poll

    If you could only choose one of the following scenarios regarding Chareidi IDF service, which would you choose?





    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/settlements-obama-and-the-european-union/2012/12/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close