web analytics
June 20, 2013 / 12 Tammuz, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Bicycle in South Pioneers of the Periphery: Olim of the South

Got that pioneering spirit? You’re invited to help build Israel’s periphery by planting roots in southern soil with Nefesh B’Nefesh.



Israel Loses An Important Friend


tell a friend
Media-Monitor-logo

The Rev. Jerry Falwell, who died this week at age 73, was one of those figures who constantly attract the media’s scorn. It comes with the territory when you’re either a biblical literalist, a political conservative, or someone not shy about taking a sword to liberalism’s sacred cows. Falwell fit all those categories, making him a three-time loser to journalists whose taste in religious leaders runs more along the lines of a Desmond Tutu or a William Sloane Coffin.

While much of what had been said about Falwell was unfair or even untrue (the 1980 remark by Baptist bigwig Bailey Smith that “God almighty does not hear the prayer of a Jew” was for years afterward erroneously attributed to Falwell by Jules Witcover, Jack Germond and other liberal reporters), there’s no denying he had a habit of giving his opponents the rope with which they happily attempted to hang him.

A prime example of Falwell’s foot-in-mouth disease came in January 1999, when his remarks concerning the Antichrist spoken of in the New Testament touched off a mini-brouhaha, particularly in Jewish media circles.

While the Christian Bible makes no reference to the ethnic background or nationality of this anticipated false messiah, there are those – Falwell apparently was among them – who believe that by definition he will have to be a Jew, in order to be a perfect counterfeit of the Jewish Jesus.

While it can be argued that such a belief is not, in and of itself, anti-Semitic, the imagery conveyed is uncomfortably close to that of the centuries-old Christian (particularly Roman Catholic) portrayal of the Jew as the literal embodiment of Satan. However unwittingly, Falwell was guilty of dredging up some dangerous old symbolism.

It wasn’t the first time Falwell had exhibited a certain carelessness with his remarks about Jews; once – during a sermon on the sin of anti-Semitism! – he told his congregants, “I know a few of you here today don’t like Jews. And I know why. He can make more money accidentally than you can on purpose.”

An innocuous statement in a Jackie Mason monologue, perhaps, but something less than amusing when coming from a church pulpit.

Falwell burst onto the national stage in 1979 with his formation of the Moral Majority, an organization dedicated to scaling back the excesses of post-1960’s America and restoring a more traditional social order.

Scorned by urban sophisticates, the Moral Majority nevertheless became part of a national conservative wave that in 1980 swept the ineffectual Jimmy Carter out of Washington and brought Ronald Reagan into the White House.

The pastor of a large church in Lynchburg, Virginia, Falwell offered a sober contrast to many of the other media-savvy evangelists who came to fame in the 1980’s. Unlike Pat Robertson, Falwell never claimed the ability to change the course of hurricanes or make cancerous tumors disappear.

And unlike Jimmy Swaggart, Jim Bakker, James Robison (who once told an audience that “an anti-Semite is someone who hates Jews more than he’s supposed to”) and other television preachers who eventually had their moral and ethical shortcomings exposed, Falwell managed to keep his nose clean and reputation intact.

Falwell also distinguished himself with his all-out support for the state of Israel. While older well-known evangelists like Billy Graham, Oral Roberts and Rex Humbard were equally pro-Israel, they rarely raised the issue.

It was Falwell who made Israel a personal cause, injecting himself into the debate over U.S. foreign policy in an unprecedented manner. When Israel bombed Iraq’s nuclear reactor in June 1981, Prime Minister Menachem Begin spoke with President Reagan only after he’d first made a phone call to Falwell, asking him to “explain to the Christian public the reasons for the bombing.”

Falwell, whose feelings for Israel were reflected in oft-repeated statements such as “To stand against Israel is to stand against God” and “God has raised up America for the protection of the Jews,” honored Begin’s request with his customary gusto, outdoing even many Jewish leaders in his defense of Israel’s action. (That same year, Begin ignored protests by liberal Jewish groups and presented Falwell with the Jabotinsky Award.)

Though Falwell dissolved the Moral Majority in 1989 and went on to devote much of his time and energy to his Lynchburg-based Liberty University, he remained politically outspoken, drawing widespread criticism for suggesting just days after 9/11 that the attacks were at least in part provoked by feminists, abortionists, gays, and organizations like the ACLU – a statement for which he subsequently apologized.

And to the end of his life he was steadfast as ever in his support for Israel.

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

no comments

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Latest Indepth Stories
Louis Rene Beres

Starting next week, Professor Beres’s column will be on summer hiatus until September. * * * * * In June 1998, Prof. Beres, following publication of an op-ed article in The New York Times, was invited by then-Swiss Ambassador Thomas Borer to present personal testimony before the specially-constituted Swiss Commission on World War II in [...]

Gilor-Dov

Israel is a country that understands security concerns. Many civil rights have been sacrificed in the name of security and Israelis are used to being checked every time they enter a shopping center, a large store or any public building. Americans recently learned that they, too, are subject to many checks on their most private activities.

Netanyahu shaking Arafat's hand upon handing the Palestinians most of Hebron.

Without a vision, strategy is impossible. Tactics become farcical.

No one can envy President Obama’s current dilemma over Syria.

His decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels challenging Bashar Assad’s regime drew charges that the rebel forces are driven by jihad movements, particularly al Qaeda. Further, many rebel spokesmen have regularly denounced Israel and suggested that once in power they will end Mr. Assad’s policy of not rocking the boat with Israel. How, then, critics ask, could the president align the U.S. with the rebels?

In a gushing report on the election of Hassan Rohani as Iran’s new president, The New York Times began with this: “In a striking repudiation of the ultraconservatives who wield power in Iran, voters…overwhelmingly elected a mild-mannered cleric who advocates greater personal freedoms and a more conciliatory approach to the world.”

Last month in this space we noted that the New York State Assembly was considering legislation that would prohibit domestic insurers from including on their financial statements investments in companies that engage in investment activities in Iran. These financial statements are relied upon by the state to determine whether the company is solvent and able to pay claims. That bill has since passed the Assembly, but the New York State Senate is balking at passing it as well.

There is no other candidate running for mayor who supports our community’s values as Salgado does.

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then children’s eyes are the window to the Almighty Himself.

Adding Turkey to the list of volatile states would mean even more uncertainty for Israel.

Making Rouhani the president was a brilliant strategic move for Khamene’i.

Noone, least of all me, wants to see any Arab child suffer, God forbid.

The Sanctuary was built with an ezrat nashim, a separate area for women.

The 686 men who expressed their desire to run in Iran’s presidential election were whittled down to 8.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    Female, Orthodox, Halachic Deciders and Spiritual Leaders (Maharat)









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/israel-loses-an-important-friend/2007/05/16/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close