web analytics
February 1, 2015 / 12 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Columns »

Denying The Deniers

My father-in-law is a Dutch Holocaust survivor who was liberated from Bergen Belsen at the age of twelve. Though he was exceedingly young at the time of his ordeal and liberation, the book of memoirs he wrote decades later is a startlingly accurate and detailed depiction of the political, religious, and communal climate in Holland during the Nazi era. And it is a meticulous account of his harrowing experiences in concentration camps, which included the death of his parents.

His book is just one of a plethora of Holocaust memoirs and testimonials, each one a personal documentary of the most horrific event in modern history. But apparently the surplus of first-hand testimony and our closeness in historical proximity to the Holocaust are not enough to convince some naysayers of its veracity. Indeed, a quick Google search yields close to five million hits under “Holocaust denial,” an unfathomable number slowly encroaching on the actual number of Jewish victims.

Several weeks ago the Rialto Unified School District in California defended an eighth-grade writing assignment that asked students to debate whether the Holocaust actually happened. Though the school district eventually pulled the assignment after coming under pressure, the fact that an American school would ask its students to debate whether the Holocaust was “merely a political scheme created to influence public emotion and gain” is both astounding and frightening.

Rialto students were asked to write an argumentative essay, using “textual evidence” to explain why some people claim “the Holocaust is not an actual historical event, but instead is a propaganda tool that was used for political and monetary gain.”

Though the ADL condemned the assignment as lending “legitimacy to the hateful and anti-Semitic promoters of Holocaust denial,” it ultimately concluded there was no evidence this was part of a “larger, insidious agenda” on the part of the school.

Perhaps not. But it is difficult to accept how the assignment itself does not spell out an agenda. Granting legitimacy to the idea that the Holocaust was merely a “propaganda tool” and teaching students that such a viewpoint is as valid as the historical authenticity of the Holocaust cannot be dismissed as merely an academic exercise.

Would the Rialto school have assigned a debate on whether or not slavery actually occurred or asked students if slavery was used as a “propaganda tool”? What about the Armenian genocide? No one questions the veracity of atrocities that occurred decades before the Holocaust. No one denies the tens of millions killed by the Red Chinese or the Soviet Union during the time frame overlapping World War II.

The movement to deny the Holocaust is novel even against the backdrop of the long history of crimes against the Jews. There is no history of Spanish Inquisition denial, pogrom denial, etc.

The question is why.

The answer is because denying the Holocaust does not just deny a historical event but also the perceived implications of that event. It rejects the tacit linkage between the Holocaust and its aftermath.

After the world turned its back on the systematic murder of six million Jews, its conscience niggled at it and in many cases expressed itself in an endorsement of statehood for the Jewish people. But the concept of returning to our homeland long predated the world’s (short-lived) remorse for its abandonment of the Jews. The Jewish claim to the land of Israel is not seventy years old – it’s more than two thousand years old. Our biblical inheritance is a bequeathal from God, not a guilt offering from the community of nations.

But because it is widely believed that the world’s collective guilt was responsible for the establishment of Israel in 1948 – even President Obama in his 2009 Cairo speech stated that “the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied” – those with nefarious motives recognize that denying or downplaying the reality of the Holocaust weakens Israel’s legitimacy in the eyes of too many people.

It is no wonder that PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas’s notorious doctoral dissertation reduced the number of Holocaust victims to “[possibly] below one million,” denied the use of gas chambers, and detailed a “secret relationship between Nazism and Zionism.” It is also no wonder that Abbas’s thesis is widely taught throughout the PA educational system, so much so that the Center for Near East Policy Research Center found that it “is the basis for Holocaust studies in the PA.”

A blurred line exists between anti-Semites on the far left whose eagerness to buy into the Palestinian narrative (historical revisionism at its best) leads them to minimize the Holocaust and those on the far right who are only too eager to repeat it.

Holocaust denial is both a natural precursor to the delegitimization of Israel and a well-traveled bridge between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. And the use of Holocaust rhetoric to further demonize Jews with the intent of relieving the world of its guilt while blaming Jews for persecution against others is a propaganda tool that would have made Joseph Goebbels proud.

My father-in-law is among an aging and dwindling population of Holocaust survivors, who were eyewitnesses to the horrors of the Holocaust. It is imperative that all efforts be made to keep the memories of that hellish period alive and in the forefront of our consciousness so that “Never Again” resonates with people from Rialto to Riyadh. Because there is no greater sin against the memory of the Holocaust (and its victims) than to deny its existence.

About the Author: Sara Lehmann, a freelance writer living in Brooklyn, was formerly an editor at a major New York publishing house.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

2 Responses to “Denying The Deniers”

  1. Don’t blame them much. They could be funded by Arab Money.

  2. Very, very scary! Shows how little the Americans know or care

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jeremy Bird, working for Israeli campaign outfit V15, shown at Ted Talk, May 20, 2014.
Likud Charges Opponents with Illicit Funding Through US-backed V15
Latest Indepth Stories
Eli Weiss

Shepherding in the Shomron isn’t your usual kind of shepherding – despite his business-minded beginnings, Eli has discovered that a strong ideological impetus powers the job.

Resnick-013015-Pilot

I said to myself, “This story has got to be told. We’re losing this generation of World War II and if we don’t listen to them now, we’ve lost it.”

Eller-013015

His entire existence was about spreading simcha and glorifying G-d’s name on a daily basis.

IRAN-US-POLITICS-MILITARY

An Israeli strike could theoretically damage Iran’s nuclear program; only US can terminate program

At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel

“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”

Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning

Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.

He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.

Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.

Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.

Obama’s foreign policy is viewed by both liberals and conservatives as deeply flawed

Many journalists are covertly blaming the Charlie Hebdo writers themselves through self-censorship.

Why does the Times relay different motivations and narratives for jihadists in Europe and Israel?

More Articles from Sara Lehmann

It is hard to believe that only one hundred years ago religion played such a central and accepted role in the personal and governmental lives of American citizens that its invocation was standard.

Arieh King

We see pictures of mosques, monuments for terrorists, illegal schools, and hundreds of apartments being built on Jewish land without repercussions. We are losing Jewish property, so it is up to us to protect it.

What’s important is to make the case for Israel more forcefully and to give it the articulation that the next presidential candidates ought to have.

From Obamacare to Common Core to gay marriage, radical agendas are pushed through the legal system.

In the fury and flurry of publicity surrounding the Klinghoffer opera, another musical affront to Jews almost went unnoticed.

You’re not going to change public opinion. The media are so biased you can’t get your story through. But what counts is America.

I understand how two governments can negotiate a ceasefire, but terrorists by definition are not playing by the same rules as you are.

Like all patriotic Americans, I cheered implementation of the Bush Doctrine to preemptively protect American lives from the perceived threat of WMD.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/denying-the-deniers/2014/06/12/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: