web analytics
May 29, 2015 / 11 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


After Olmert’s ‘Realignment': Israel’s Approaching Sickness Unto Death


Beres-Louis-Rene

Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert now gives guns to Arab terrorists while planning to surrender more of his country’s essential heartland. The apparent rationale of Israeli arms to Fatah is to diminish the contending power of Hamas. Inevitably, these same weapons will be used to murder individual Jews. Surely they will do absolutely nothing to help Israel.

The elegant new name given by Olmert to the next round of Israeli territorial concessions is “realignment.” A linguistic change from former Prime Minister Sharon’s “disengagement,” this semantic policy offers no real changes in substance. Like its carefully codified predecessors, it offers only Land for nothing.

What now emanates from Olmert’s continuing complicity in Israel’s defeat is a discernible scent of impurity. Surely Sharon’s disengagement has already proven itself an obvious mistake. Indisputably, Gaza is now an active base for both Hamas and Al Qaeda terrorism. What then does Olmert now hope to achieve by further strengthening Israel’s sworn enemies?

It is all so sadly predictable. The ongoing Arab/Islamic war against Israel is not about compromise. It is only about annihilation. Jewish annihilation. The only acceptable “compromise” Israel could ever offer to Fatah or Hamas (it makes no serious difference for Israel which group dominates the Palestinian Authority) would be to disappear.

Soon, Olmert and his followers will encounter a stunning irony. Following self-destructive arms transfers and realignment, Israel will appear to its many enemies as weak and without existential will. Drawing upon their own particular interpretations of sacred texts, proverbs and revealed expectations, these enemies will conclude (however erroneously) that Israel actually wishes to die. This is admittedly a very difficult concept to grasp for all those who do not seek to understand from an Arab/Islamic perspective, but it is now an indispensable mode of policy thinking.

There is yet another irony here. Sensing Israel’s newest surrenders as incontestable expressions of divine will, Israel’s principal enemies won’t immediately oblige the Jewish State’s presumed wish to die. Instead, they will “allow” Israel to disappear slowly; first, by more realignment, and later by all-out war.

This long-planned Arab Jihad will be initiated in carefully measured phases. Only when the IDF is openly fawning upon its own doom – an unutterable humiliation that has already dragged on from Rabin to Sharon to Olmert – will the dissolving Jewish state merge into “Palestine.”

Let us be frank. In the end, Washington, London, Paris and Ottawa will be pleased. Still unable to understand why their proposed “Two State Solution” never materialized, they will still be content that Israel is no longer a bother. So it is that they will proudly celebrate Israel’s “incorporation” into a “democratic Palestine.” Like Bill Clinton, who first set the American stage for Israel’s Oslo capitulations and who later provided billions of American tax dollars to North Korea that were used to build nuclear weapons, they will realize and applaud the utter unimportance of truth in politics. In the United States, a disgraced former president who also stood by silently while 800,000 people were murdered by machete in Rwanda now openly cashes in on millions of dollars in speaking fees.

About what does the former president speak to earn eight million dollars a year on the lecture circuit? He speaks about nothing. Like Seinfeld’s comedic show within a show, his presidency was all about nothing. Absolutely nothing. But this point is immaterial. The fact that no one seems to care (Mr. Clinton does, after all, “look presidential”) will give aid and comfort to all who shall soon stand silently by as Israel’s enemies plan their final battles.

Despair, we learn from the philosopher Kierkegaard, “is the sickness unto death,” and it is now Israel’s possible fate to despair for a long, long while, eventually to a point where it might actually prefer to die. If Israel’s enemies interpret Olmert’s realignment as a fulfillment of precise religious expectations, the torment of Israel’s despair will be that it shall not be able to die. To be sick in this grotesque fashion, to be sick unto death and not even to be able to die, would be for all Israel the unkindest cut of all.

The despairing state, like the despairing individual, cannot die. For Israel, the agonizing hopelessness – in this case, even the last hope of death would be unavailable – will entail “dying the death,” living to experience death. This fate is much worse than simply being allowed to die – to expire quickly, completely, blessedly. But to die and yet not to die – to actually die the death – would be for Israel a fate distinctly worse than death.

Thus it is that despair, this immobilizing sickness in the Israeli “Self,” is the Jewish State’s sickness unto death. The despairing Jewish State under Olmert is mortally ill, but it will not be allowed to die, at least not for a while. To be delivered from this sickness unto death is impossible, unless Israel’s profound sickness of the spirit is first understood. This sickness – a rotting of Israel’s Jewish soul – now enhanced and accelerated by realignment, is ultimately more dangerous than even enemy armies and missiles. Although it is certainly correct that a dramatic synergy exists between enemy military might and Israel’s growing “soulless-ness,” it is the latter that breeds a virulent sickness unto death.

Israel’s sickness of the spirit is not its sickness unto death. Rather, it is the pathology that leads to the sickness unto death. It is, therefore, an illness that leads not to death directly (that would be a relatively favorable outcome), but to a protracted death by an extended despair.

Fear and trembling: It is time for Israel to experience these sorts of dread, to acknowledge that the Third Temple Commonwealth may not live to see a Third Temple, and to understand that realignment, like disengagement, is always an unforgivable crime.

The “moderate” Palestinian Authority’s appointed clergy, preaching on the Temple Mount, recently offered the following familiar sermon: “Palestinians spearhead Allah’s war against the Jews. The dead shall not rise until the Palestinians shall kill all the Jews…All agreements with Israel are provisional.” As for expected Palestinian gratitude to the United States for pushing Israel into the road map ambit of genocide, here is what another PA-appointed preacher said on the Gaza-based Al Quds radio station on the day following last July’s London bombings: “We welcome these blessed acts….”

The Palestinian solution for the Jews is an open “Final Solution”. As long as Israel agrees to yield to such a plan, its sickness of the spirit will spread. Finally, unless realignment can finally give way to courage, it will become the sickness unto death.

LOUIS RENE BERES was educated at Princeton University (Ph.D., 1971). He lectures and publishes widely on international relations and international law. Professor Beres is Strategic and Military Affairs columnist for The Jewish Press.

About the Author: Louis René Beres (Ph.D., Princeton, 1971) is professor of political science and international law at Purdue University and the author of many books and articles dealing with international relations and strategic studies.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “After Olmert’s ‘Realignment': Israel’s Approaching Sickness Unto Death”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
What's happened to NYC's Celebrate Israel Parade?
Israel Rejects as ‘False’ UJA Federation’s Claims about Israel Parade ‘Inclusion’
Latest Indepth Stories
Keeping-Jerusalem

For a peace treaty with the PA, half the Israeli public would agree to divide the Jerusalem

As for the president’s new, softer tone vis-à-vis Prime Minister Netanyahu and Israel, this is most likely being driven by the results of the recent Israeli election.

What especially appeals to us is his grand – some critics would say extravagant –view of what the borders of Israel should look like.

There was something else of great importance in play – something we would have liked to see him take into account before deciding to stand with the boycotters.

The establishment of Hebrew University was a cause much beloved to Einstein who in 1923, during what would be his only trip to Eretz Yisrael, delivered the university’s inaugural lecture on Har Hatzofim (Mt. Scopus) and, discussing the theory of relativity, spoke the first few sentences of his address in Hebrew.

The Golden Square wanted Germany to destroy the British and Jewish presence in their country. The Third Reich craved what was beneath the ground – oil.

Ida Nudel’s account of how the Soviets persecuted and punished her was far worse than imagined.

Swim4Sadna is an annual event benefiting Sadna, an integrative special-ed community in Gush Etzion

Prof. Wistrich, was THE foremost historian of anti-Semitism; committed spokesman & advocate of Jewry

Jewish Voices for Peace’s 2015 Haggadah is a blatant anti-Israel screed crying, “L’chayim to BDS!”

On his shloshim, I want to discuss a term I’ve heard countless times about Rav Aharon: Gedol HaDor

After obsequious claims of devotion to Israel, Obama took to criticizing Israel on peace process

Mr. Obama, Israeli voters have democratically chosen to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea&Samaria

Netanyahu so disdains Shaked’s appointment he completely ignored her after the swearing-in ceremony

More Articles from Louis Rene Beres

A “Palestine” could become another Lebanon, with many different factions battling for control.

Louis Rene Beres

President Obama’s core argument on a Middle East peace process is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Once upon a time in America, every adult could recite at least some Spenglerian theory of decline.

President Obama’s core argument is still founded on incorrect assumptions.

Specific strategic lessons from the Bar Kokhba rebellion.

Still facing an effectively unhindered nuclear threat from Iran, Israel will soon need to choose between two strategic options.

For states, as for individuals, fear and reality go together naturally.

So much of the struggle between Israel and the Arabs continues to concern space.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/louis-bene-beres/after-olmerts-realignment-israels-approaching-sickness-unto-death/2006/06/28/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: