web analytics
May 28, 2015 / 10 Sivan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Change At The New York Times?

Demonstrating the bias of the Mideast reporting of the New York Times is hardly as attention-grabbing these days as when The Jewish Press began doing so several years ago. Just about everyone has now gotten “with the program”. Yet, it is important, despite various calls for boycotts and even some grudging acknowledgment by The Times that there is a problem, not to allow the issue to fade.

A case in point is a news article on terrorist violence by James Bennet, entitled, “Bethlehem Invaded Again, As Israelis Extend Control,” in Monday’s edition of the paper. He began his report by saying:

Israeli tanks and armored personnel carriers raced under a full moon into Bethlehem early today, in what military officials said was likely to be the largest invasion yet of the rolling West Bank police action that Israel began after wrapping up its major ground offensive earlier this month.

For the next eight paragraphs, Mr. Bennet goes on variously to note that the new operation was “part of Israel’s campaign to seize full responsibility for its own security” respecting the West Bank; this action represented “a very important change in the situation”; it was “a fundamental shift” which “has complicated the Bush administration’s plan to press for reform of the Palestinian security forces.” “CIA Director George Tenet will be trying to reform the Palestinian security forces”; the Bush administration “hopes to restore some responsibility for security to the Palestinians.” “A central component of the Oslo agreement was that the PA would police its own militant groups … and now, the deal is off. Israel has given up on relying on the PA for security for its citizens.”

Bennet, in his next three paragraphs, reports that Palestinian officials claim “Israel reneged on [the Oslo] deal by not turning over land on schedule and instead building more settlements. [The Palestinians] accuse Israel of trying to destroy the Oslo agreement in order to prevent a Palestinian state.” Israeli officials fear any rebuilding of Palestinian security forces while Arafat is still in control; and one MK urges a purely “military solution to eradicate terrorism.”

It was not until paragraphs thirteen and fourteen of the twenty-four paragraph piece that the reason is given for the Bethlehem incursion, describing it this way:

Despite the increased Israeli security measures, including ever-tighter blockades of Palestinian cities, suicide bombers are again striking deep inside Israel. Israel says its forces are regularly intercepting potential attackers, but others are slipping through.

Israeli officials said Palestinians almost succeeded last week in blowing up a huge gasoline depot in a Tel Aviv suburb with a magnetic bomb, hidden on a diesel tanker truck and apparently activated by a cellphone.

Some detect a change over at The Times resulting from the widespread dismay in the Jewish community. Maybe so. But there is obviously a long way to go.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Change At The New York Times?”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Ben & Jerry's new flavor: Bernie Sanders
Ben & Jerry’s Launches New Flavor: Bernie Sanders
Latest Indepth Stories
J-Street

Jewish Voices for Peace’s 2015 Haggadah is a blatant anti-Israel screed crying, “L’chayim to BDS!”

Rabbi Lichtenstein (z"l).

On his shloshim, I want to discuss a term I’ve heard countless times about Rav Aharon: Gedol HaDor

Abbas and Obama

After obsequious claims of devotion to Israel, Obama took to criticizing Israel on peace process

Ronal Shoval Voting

Mr. Obama, Israeli voters have democratically chosen to apply Israeli sovereignty over Judea&Samaria

Netanyahu so disdains Shaked’s appointment he completely ignored her after the swearing-in ceremony

Ronen Shamir’s just the latest tenured Leftist convicted of sexual misconduct with his own student

NY Times precious front page ink is only reserved for portrayals of Israel as the aggressor.

Although I loved law school, I doubted myself: Who would come to me, a chassidish woman lawyer?

American Jews who go gaga for Obama are first and foremost “Liberals of the Mosaic Persuasion”

“Illinois is the first state to take concrete, legally binding action against the BDS campaign”

Many books have supported the preferability- not to be confused with desirability- of the status quo

Consider the Pope’s desperation, reading daily reports of the slaughter of Christians by Muslims

The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR

Pentecost, derived from the Greek word for 50, is celebrated 50 days after Easter.

U.S and European demands for the creation of a Palestinian State in the West Bank is world hypocrisy.

We take a whole person approach, giving our people assistance with whatever they need.

More Articles from Editorial Board

“Let’s get something straight so we don’t kid each other…[the Iranians] already have paved a path to a bomb’s worth of material,” said Mr. Biden. “Iran could get there now if they walked away in two to three months without a deal.”

Beyond the particulars of this tragic death, however, we should all be concerned about the possibility that a criminal prosecution in a major American city is being driven by fear of mobs in the street.

The president is unwilling to cede any of what he considers his exclusive powers in the area of foreign policy and has struggled mightily to keep the Senate away from any role in the kind of deal to be negotiated.

A committed Religious Zionist, he was a sought-after adviser on Zionist affairs around the world.

More important, Mr. Obama is simply acceding to Iran’s position on the timing of the lifting of sanctions.

For our community, Mrs. Clinton’s foreign policy record will doubtless attract the most attention. And it is a most interesting one.

He went on to say that the United States would defend Israel if it were “attacked by any state.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/change-at-the-new-york-times/2002/06/28/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: