web analytics
July 30, 2015 / 14 Av, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Letters To The Editor

Letters-logo

Haredim And Israel (I)

Re reader Asher Bernstein’s April 11 letter:

I too find haredi arguments against the state of Israel to be specious at best, disingenuous at worst.

One of the most famous of such arguments is based on the midrashic tale of the newly exiled Jews taking an oath that they would not try to reclaim Eretz Yisrael on their own. The nations of the world, for their part, simultaneously vowed not to excessively persecute the Jews during their exile. One oath was contingent on the other.

First of all, the story of the oaths, as noted above, is derived from a midrash, and the Rambam and others have cautioned us not to take midrashim literally.

Think for a moment about the implications of this particular story if taken literally. Does it mean Hashem actually revealed Himself to all the nations and extracted a vow from them? How did He do so? Did every member of every nation get a vote? Did Hashem speak only to the leaders of the nations?

And if the story were literally true, would it not have been handed down in the history and lore of all those nations? What nation could possibly forget the auspicious moment when the Creator of the Universe asked it to make a vow?

And if the story is meant to be understood literally, if it happened precisely as described in the midrash and the nations actually swore such an oath, haven’t they broken it many times over? Haven’t the Jews been persecuted excessively during their long exile? Expulsions, pogroms, forced conversions, serial massacres, and of course the Holocaust – that’s not excessive?

If the nations of the world literally swore an oath not to excessively persecute the Jews, surely they’ve broken it many times over and the Jews therefore are no longer bound to their own oath not to reconquer Eretz Yisrael by force of arms.

On the other hand, if the story was not meant to be taken literally, then the oaths it describes carry no moral suasion or historical legitimacy. So either way, whether the story is literal truth or poetic metaphor, it hardly constitutes a persuasive argument against the formation of Israel in 1948.

Gedaliah Shapiro
(Via E-Mail)

 

Haredim And Israel (II)

Reader Asher Bernstein is wrong about haredi feelings concerning the state of Israel.

As believers in Hashem they can hardly (and largely don’t) deny that Israel’s military and economic successes were miraculous. Where they differ from many of us is they don’t accept the idea that the modern state of Israel somehow represents the biblical vision of a restored Davidic kingdom. They insist that the latter must be the result of the coming of Mashiach.

In the context of the draft controversy, haredim would also suggest to their critics that perhaps Israel’s successes are tied to the undeniable flourishing of Torah learning in the Jewish state. Anyway, I’ve always felt that all Jews of whatever stripe have an obligation to support their fellow Jews who are in danger.

Ari Solomon
(Via E-Mail)

 

The Fight Over The Chief Rabbinate (I)

In his April 11 op-ed article (“An Attack on Torah and Tradition”), Rabbi Yehoshua S. Hecht argues forcefully against any attempts to weaken the Chief Rabbinate of Israel.

I wonder, however, if Rabbi Hecht would be so strongly supportive of the Chief Rabbinate if it were still under the control of the Religious Zionist camp, as was the case for the first few decades of Israel’s existence. In those days, Orthodox Jews who were not Religious Zionists viewed the Chief Rabbinate as irrelevant and a tool of the Zionist government, and the rulings of various haredi rabbis were always taken much more seriously than anything the chief rabbis said.

Isaac Levinson
(Via E-Mail)

 

The Fight Over The Chief Rabbinate (II)

The institution of the Chief Rabbinate was invented by the British and imposed in Israel during the Mandate. It is long past time to reexamine whether this institution benefits or harms the Jews in Israel.

Stephen Asbe
(Posted at JewishPress.com)

 

U.S. Hypocrisy

In April 1979, Hamid Aboutalebi was part of the group that seized the U.S. Embassy in Iran and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days. Now, Iran wants Aboutalebi to be the Islamic Republic’s representative to the UN. Because the UN headquarters is located in New York, Aboutalebi has requested that the State Department grant him a visa to enter our country. And of course, most in the United States government are rightfully upset about this, and are seeking to prevent him from getting a visa to enter the USA.

However, our same U.S. government didn’t have any problem pressuring the Israeli government to release terrorist prisoners, many of whom had murdered Israeli civilians. Many of these terrorists committed their crimes less than a quarter of a century ago. Seventy-eight of them have been released to a hero’s welcome by the Palestinian Authority, along with good paying jobs and a pension. Past history shows that many of them might return to terrorism. They are also considered role models for Palestinian youth, who may also be encouraged to become terrorists.

Hamid Aboutalebi committed his crime 35 years ago, and no Americans were murdered. He also isn’t likely to murder any Americans while on our soil. The hypocrisy of the U.S. government is appalling. Why is it considered proper for the U.S. to pressure Israel to release terrorist murderers and yet we won’t give a visa to a man who merely facilitated the kidnapping of Americans 35 years ago?

To compound the sin, our American government has been pressuring Israel to release an additional 400 terrorists. Is this government really concerned about the security of Israel?

Richard Chaimberlin
Rochester, NY

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Letters To The Editor”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
The White House will free Pollard but bar him from traveling to Israel for five years.
US Won’t Let Pollard Out of Country for Five Years
Latest Indepth Stories

By most accounts, the one person with the political muscle to swing enough Democratic votes to override a veto is Sen. Schumer.

The next day, in a speech in New York to the Council on Foreign Relations, Mr. Kerry substantially upped the ante.

In Israel, the judiciary has established itself as superior to ALL other branches of the government.

The Fifteenth Day of the month of Av became a day of national rejoicing. The moment that had seemed hopeless became the moment of Redemption.

I think the melodies in our religious services have a haunting sound to them that just permeates your guts and gets into your soul. If you have any musical inclination, I think they inspire you to compose.

Cavalier analogies to the Holocaust are unacceptable, but Huckabee’s analogy was very appropriate.

Pollard was a Jewish-head-on-a-pike for all American Jews to see and to learn the explicit lesson.

If the Iran deal passes, Obama’s WH becomes world’s leading financier of terrorism against Americans

{Originally posted to the author’s website, FirstOne Through} Some passionate and eloquent liberals have bemoaned the state of inclusiveness among Jews today. Leon Wieseltier, editor of the New Republic penned an angry piece “J Street’s Rejection Is a Scandal” about the exclusion in 2014 of J Street from the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations. […]

Magnanimity by Moshe Dayan, allowing Muslim control of the Temple Mount, led to today’s situation.

It was modeled upon a similar fund that had been set up by Sephardic Jews in Venice. But Amsterdam’s Dotar was initially more ambitious in scope.

Rav Aharon Margalit is a bestselling author – his book, As Long As I Live, has been translated into four languages – and a standing-room only lecturer. Both religious and non-religious audiences flock to hear him. What makes him so extraordinary? Rav Margalit is a Chasidic Jew who experienced incredible challenges from a very young […]

J Street is the vanguard (Jewish face)in support of Obama’s Vienna Accords Nuclear Deal with Iran

“I hold the woman’s place over that of men in every fundamental aspect of public and private life.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/letters-to-the-editor/letters-to-the-editor-298/2014/04/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: