web analytics
April 23, 2014 / 23 Nisan, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Spa 1.2 Combining Modern Living in Traditional Jerusalem

A unique and prestigious residential project in now being built in Mekor Haim Street in Jerusalem.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Exposing The Agenda Of Jewish ‘Progressives’


Share Button

Devious ideologues hate light because light exposes their loathsome tricks. So it is not surprising that Letty Cottin Pogrebin and her cohort, incisively critiqued by Dr. Kenneth Levin in a recent Jewish Press front-page essay (“The Empty Rage of Jewish ‘Progressives,’” April 20), hate seeing the word “progressives” in quotation marks.

Professor Alvin Rosenfeld used such quotation marks in his recent monograph (“‘Progressive’ Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism,” published last December by the American Jewish Committee). He should keep them there whenever he writes about Pogrebin and her ilk, to signal that they are “progressives” only in the ludicrous sense that lemmings marching in lockstep toward a cliff are “progressing.”

In the April issue of Moment magazine, Pogrebin used her regularly-appearing column to censure Professor Rosenfeld for “lumping” members of her cohort “with rabid anti-Zionists and execrable anti-Semites.”

They may or may not be “execrable anti-Semites,” but they are beyond question “rabid anti-Zionists.” Their own fulminations leave no room for debate. Professor Rosenfeld’s monograph, and Dr. Levin’s article, merely quote them at length.

But that’s precisely what infuriates them, because it leaves them no dark corner in which to hide.

Pogrebin attributes to Professor Rosenfeld the following absurd position, which, of course, he has never taken: “If you’re a Jew who has ever said or written anything critical of Israel, then you may be contributing to an ‘intellectual and political climate that helps to foster’ hostility toward the Jewish state and exacerbates hatred against Jews.”

Is Pogrebin really vapid enough to believe that Professor Rosenfeld does not know the difference between “anything” and something that’s little more than an ideological rant? Or does she merely hope her readers will be naïve enough to believe he doesn’t know the difference?

Is she really vapid enough to believe that people like Tony Judt (“Israel today … is bad for the Jews”), Adrienne Rich (Zionism “needs to dissolve before twenty-first century realities”), Richard Cohen (“Israel itself is a mistake”), and Tony Kushner (“I have a problem with the idea of a Jewish state”) are, in her words, “respected cultural figures,” rather than figures respected principally by those who share their ideology? Or does she merely hope her readers are uninformed enough to believe it?

In an obscene effort to bond rabbinic Judaism to her rant, Pogrebin noted, toward the end of her column: “The Talmud records that Rabbis Hillel and Shammai had more than 300 differences of opinion.”

They certainly did have differences of opinion. But which of those differences concern the idea that God had given the Land of Israel, in perpetuity, to the Jewish people? Which of them debate whether or not the Jewish people were entitled to exist in the Land of Israel? Which of them entertain the notion that God had sanctified the land for any other people?

Which of the opinions express any doubt that the Land of Israel was the only home God had sanctified for the Jewish people? Which of them could possibly be interpreted as denying that “progressives” who befoul the Jewish people and their sanctified home commit not merely a crime but a sin against the Covenant between God and His people?

In a closing flourish, Pogrebin quoted the published work of a professor who, she wrote, “highlights the rabbinic obligation ‘to rebuke or reprove one’s neighbor…’ and emphasizes that this ‘refers to one’s fellow Israelite.’”

The professor is correct. But in what was probably a telling slip of Pogrebin’s “progressive” mind, she neglected to mention two facts: that only the transgression of commandments imposed on Jews by God are to be rebuked, not the “commandments” of liberal enlightenment; and that only Jews who fear God and revere His commandments may issue the rebukes, not “progressives” for whom both God and His commandments are the fantasies of benighted ancients.

So the professor’s observation is correct. Jews who besmirch God’s chosen people, and the homeland He has sanctified for them, should be rebuked – but by Jews who believe in God and His commandments, not by clever ideologues who would consign to the dustbin of history the Covenant that alone has sustained the Jewish people through millennia.

Pogrebin and her fellow “progressives” do not deserve the courtesy of rational discourse that Professor Rosenfeld’s monograph, and Dr. Levin’s article, accorded them. They deserve exposure, scorn and shame.

Share Button

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

No Responses to “Exposing The Agenda Of Jewish ‘Progressives’”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Abbas and Hanieyh on poster, next to a picture of Arafat.
Kerry’s Talks Achieve Peace Between Hamas and Fatah
Latest Indepth Stories
Al-Aksa Mosque was claimed to be the site from which Mohammed ascended to Heaven, but it was built nearly 50 years after Mohammed died.

Jerusalem only seems important in the Islamic world when non-Muslims control or capture the city.

Israeli police enter the Al-Aqsa mosque compound in Jerusalem's Old City to disperse stone-throwing Palestinian protesters.

Jordan’s king is adding fuel to the fire on the Temple Mount, blaming Israel for violence by Muslim Arab rioters.

Imam Suhail Webb who boasted his Muslim community persuaded Brandeis President Fred Lawrence to withdraw an invitation to Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

At Brandeis, much of what counts as Western civilization got cold feet and won’t stand with Hirsi Ali.

Text of anti-Semitic flyer distributed to Jews in Donetsk, Ukraine on Passover 2014.

But the lesson from this meditation is that hidden behind the anti-semitic act is the greatest light.

As support of their messianic dream, Halevi and Antepli approve dishonoring Hirsi Ali as a ‘renegade.’

If itis a mitzva to eat matza all Pesach, then why is there no berakha attached to it?

When we are united with unconditional love, no stone will be raised against us by our enemies.

The reporter simply reports the news, but it is greater to be inspired to better the situation.

The Big Bang theory marked the scientific community’s first sense of the universe having a beginning.

Freeing convicted murderers returns the status of Jewish existence to something less than sanctified.

“The bigger they are the harder they fall” describes what God had in mind for Olmert.

We, soldiers of the IDF, who stand guard over the people and the land, fulfill the hopes of the millions of Jewish people across the generations who sought freedom.

How much is the human mind able to grasp of the Divine?

Jews have brought the baggage of the galut (exile) mentality to the modern state of Israel.

The Haggadah is an instruction manual on how to survive as strangers in strange lands.

More Articles from Aaron Streiter

Devious ideologues hate light because light exposes their loathsome tricks. So it is not surprising that Letty Cottin Pogrebin and her cohort, incisively critiqued by Dr. Kenneth Levin in a recent Jewish Press front-page essay (“The Empty Rage of Jewish ‘Progressives,’” April 20), hate seeing the word “progressives” in quotation marks.

    Latest Poll

    Now that Kerry's "Peace Talks" are apparently over, are you...?







    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/exposing-the-agenda-of-jewish-progressives/2007/06/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: