web analytics
October 23, 2014 / 29 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Exposing The Agenda Of Jewish ‘Progressives’


Devious ideologues hate light because light exposes their loathsome tricks. So it is not surprising that Letty Cottin Pogrebin and her cohort, incisively critiqued by Dr. Kenneth Levin in a recent Jewish Press front-page essay (“The Empty Rage of Jewish ‘Progressives,’” April 20), hate seeing the word “progressives” in quotation marks.

Professor Alvin Rosenfeld used such quotation marks in his recent monograph (“‘Progressive’ Jewish Thought and the New Anti-Semitism,” published last December by the American Jewish Committee). He should keep them there whenever he writes about Pogrebin and her ilk, to signal that they are “progressives” only in the ludicrous sense that lemmings marching in lockstep toward a cliff are “progressing.”

In the April issue of Moment magazine, Pogrebin used her regularly-appearing column to censure Professor Rosenfeld for “lumping” members of her cohort “with rabid anti-Zionists and execrable anti-Semites.”

They may or may not be “execrable anti-Semites,” but they are beyond question “rabid anti-Zionists.” Their own fulminations leave no room for debate. Professor Rosenfeld’s monograph, and Dr. Levin’s article, merely quote them at length.

But that’s precisely what infuriates them, because it leaves them no dark corner in which to hide.

Pogrebin attributes to Professor Rosenfeld the following absurd position, which, of course, he has never taken: “If you’re a Jew who has ever said or written anything critical of Israel, then you may be contributing to an ‘intellectual and political climate that helps to foster’ hostility toward the Jewish state and exacerbates hatred against Jews.”

Is Pogrebin really vapid enough to believe that Professor Rosenfeld does not know the difference between “anything” and something that’s little more than an ideological rant? Or does she merely hope her readers will be naïve enough to believe he doesn’t know the difference?

Is she really vapid enough to believe that people like Tony Judt (“Israel today … is bad for the Jews”), Adrienne Rich (Zionism “needs to dissolve before twenty-first century realities”), Richard Cohen (“Israel itself is a mistake”), and Tony Kushner (“I have a problem with the idea of a Jewish state”) are, in her words, “respected cultural figures,” rather than figures respected principally by those who share their ideology? Or does she merely hope her readers are uninformed enough to believe it?

In an obscene effort to bond rabbinic Judaism to her rant, Pogrebin noted, toward the end of her column: “The Talmud records that Rabbis Hillel and Shammai had more than 300 differences of opinion.”

They certainly did have differences of opinion. But which of those differences concern the idea that God had given the Land of Israel, in perpetuity, to the Jewish people? Which of them debate whether or not the Jewish people were entitled to exist in the Land of Israel? Which of them entertain the notion that God had sanctified the land for any other people?

Which of the opinions express any doubt that the Land of Israel was the only home God had sanctified for the Jewish people? Which of them could possibly be interpreted as denying that “progressives” who befoul the Jewish people and their sanctified home commit not merely a crime but a sin against the Covenant between God and His people?

In a closing flourish, Pogrebin quoted the published work of a professor who, she wrote, “highlights the rabbinic obligation ‘to rebuke or reprove one’s neighbor…’ and emphasizes that this ‘refers to one’s fellow Israelite.’”

The professor is correct. But in what was probably a telling slip of Pogrebin’s “progressive” mind, she neglected to mention two facts: that only the transgression of commandments imposed on Jews by God are to be rebuked, not the “commandments” of liberal enlightenment; and that only Jews who fear God and revere His commandments may issue the rebukes, not “progressives” for whom both God and His commandments are the fantasies of benighted ancients.

So the professor’s observation is correct. Jews who besmirch God’s chosen people, and the homeland He has sanctified for them, should be rebuked – but by Jews who believe in God and His commandments, not by clever ideologues who would consign to the dustbin of history the Covenant that alone has sustained the Jewish people through millennia.

Pogrebin and her fellow “progressives” do not deserve the courtesy of rational discourse that Professor Rosenfeld’s monograph, and Dr. Levin’s article, accorded them. They deserve exposure, scorn and shame.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Exposing The Agenda Of Jewish ‘Progressives’”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Ebola virus particles.
New York City Hospital Testing Patient for Ebola Virus
Latest Indepth Stories
Bills to restore the balance of power in Israel will be fought by the not-so-judicial left.

Widespread agreement in Israel opposing Palestinian diplomatic warfare, commonly called “lawfare.”

Chaye Zisel Braun

Arab terrorism against Jews and the State of Israel is not something we should be “calm” about.

Peace Now Chairman Yariv Oppenheimer

The Israeli left, led by tenured academics, endorses pretty much anything harmful to its own country

Grave site of terror victim Leon Klinghoffer.

We were devastated: The exploitation of our father’s murder as a vehicle for political commentary.

Judea and Samaria (Yesha) have been governed by the IDF and not officially under Israeli sovereignty

While not all criticism of Israel stemmed from anti-Semitism, Podhoretz contends the level of animosity towards Israel rises exponentially the farther left one moved along the spectrum.

n past decades, Oman has struck a diplomatic balance between Saudi Arabia, the West, and Iran.

The Torah scroll which my family donated will ride aboard the USS Gerald R. Ford aircraft carrier

The Jewish Press endorses the reelection of Gov. Andrew Cuomo. His record as governor these past four years offers eloquent testimony to the experience and vision he has to lead the Empire State for the next four years.

I think Seth Lipsky is amazing, but it just drives home the point that newspapers have a lot of moving parts.

Myth #1: It is easy to be a B’nai Noach. It is extraordinarily hard to be a B’nai Noach.

The question of anti-Semitism in Europe today is truly tied to the issue of immigration.

Polls indicate that the Palestinians are much more against a two state solution than the Israelis.

Turkey and Iran the 2 regional powers surrounding the ISIS conflict gain from a partial ISIS victory

More Articles from Aaron Streiter

Devious ideologues hate light because light exposes their loathsome tricks. So it is not surprising that Letty Cottin Pogrebin and her cohort, incisively critiqued by Dr. Kenneth Levin in a recent Jewish Press front-page essay (“The Empty Rage of Jewish ‘Progressives,’” April 20), hate seeing the word “progressives” in quotation marks.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/exposing-the-agenda-of-jewish-progressives/2007/06/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: