Latest update: April 29th, 2013
While most American Christians, especially evangelicals, support Israel, there has for some time now been a trend among European churches and their liberal counterparts in the U.S. such as the World Council of Churches, to criticize Israel, pass divestment motions and support Palestinian extremism.
The spectacle of European leftists at anti-Israel rallies in Palestinian-controlled areas is a disturbing phenomenon, to be sure, but it has been played out in miniature in Israel itself, where some local Palestinian Christians have become radicalized alongside their European friends. The origins of this anti-Israel Christian sentiment can be traced back to European missionaries in the 19th century who arrived in the Land of Israel intending to convert local Jews.
The activities of certain Christian missionary societies in the land of Israel reflect a deep level of hypocrisy. Before 1948 and the Holocaust they attempted to convert Jews. After the Holocaust they became partisans of Palestinian nationalism, providing education to Muslims and supporting radical Palestinian narratives.
This switch in mindset from subtly anti-Jewish (conversion) to blatantly pro-Palestinian shows the degree to which Jews have remained the enemy of these groups. It is part and parcel of the larger hypocrisy across Europe whereby Jews, long persecuted as a stateless minority, are now persecuted by self-described progressives who accuse the reborn Jewish state of violating Arab rights and constituting a threat to world peace.
Whatever the Jews do, it seems they are on the wrong side of history, at least according to some.
During the 19th century numerous Christian missionaries arrived in the Holy Land with the objective of converting the poverty-stricken religious Jewish community. Organizations such as the London Society for the Propagation of Christianity Among the Jews, the Lutheran Church and the Church of Scotland targeted Jews in Jerusalem and Safed. Later, American groups and messianists such as the founders of the American Colony also directed conversionary efforts at Jews.
To understand the hypocrisy, it is necessary to understand how it plays on many levels.
Consider how the Evangelical Lutheran Church in Jordan and the Holy Land (ELCHL) describes its mission: “God calls the ELCHL to proclaim the Gospel within an Arab context in the Holy Lands…. we seek to serve our Palestinian people…. The ELCJHL is a catalyst for a just peace…. [we] can properly be called a church of [Palestinian] refugees. Bishop Dr. Munib A. Younan believes that educating Lutheran and other Christian communities around the world about…the Palestinian struggle is essential if Palestine is to attain recognition and autonomy.”
This is a nationalist church, with relatively few adherents, peddling a nationalism not only for Palestinian Christians but even more so for Palestinian Muslims, since the latter constitute as much as 95 percent of the “nation” whose autonomy the church is fighting for.
Where, one must ask, where were the Lutherans in the fight for the rights of the Jewish nation? They claim God calls them to serve the poorest, but where were they when the Jews were poor, when the Jews were in the camps and when Jewish refugees arrived in Israel with nothing?
We happen to know a lot about where the Lutheran church was, just as we know a lot about where the Red Cross was when Jews were in need. The Lutherans collaborated with the Nazis. The Lutheran church and its founder, Martin Luther, served as inspirations for Nazi anti-Semitism. (Hitler received most of his votes from Lutheran Germans, not from Catholic southern Germans).
When the Jewish nation was struggling, the Lutherans had no interest. The Lutheran church doesn’t merely devote itself to its congregants in Israel (of whom there are but a handful); it also publishes articles condemning the “threat” from Christian Zionism. But aren’t Christian Zionists simply doing for the Jews what the Lutherans never did?
The Lutheran role in supporting Palestinian nationalism and opposing Israel is but one small tip of the iceberg of this phenomenon. The Church of Scotland sent a commission of inquiry to Syria as early as 1839 “to find out whether a mission to the Jews was feasible.” But the Jews of Syria were stiff-necked, so the Scots turned their attention to Jerusalem where they found that the London Jews Society had already set to work seeking Jewish converts. Galilee, however, remained “an uncultivated field” and so they set their sights on Safed (and later on Aleppo.)Seth J. Frantzman
About the Author: Seth Frantzman is a columnist for the Jerusalem Post. His front-page essay “Early Reform and Islamic Exoticism” appeared in the June 5 issue of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.