Latest update: November 20th, 2013
Before entering the White House, President Obama promised repeatedly to do “everything, everything” to prevent the Iranian regime obtaining nuclear weapons.
Upon closer examination, one sees this promise is as true as his statements that Americans would be able to keep their healthcare plans and that an unknown anti-Muslim video caused the terrorist slaughter of Americans in Benghazi.
Why? For at least seven reasons.
First, last weekend the Obama administration sought to finalize a deal with Iran that would enable Tehran to continue operating its plutonium reactor, retain all its centrifuges and maintain uranium enrichment program to 3.5 percent – enough, given Iran’s recent, hugely expanded number of centrifuges, to become a breakout nuclear state. The previous week, Obama urged the Senate not to impose new sanctions and American Jewish leaders to stop asking Congress for them.
Second, contrary to the administration’s declared policy, Obama has displayed a willingness to live with a nuclear Iran. In July 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said the U.S. would extend a “missile shield” over the Middle East if Tehran went nuclear. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel argued for years before his confirmation in 2013 that that the U.S. should repudiate both military and economic measures to stop Iran.
Both Clinton and Hagel subsequently reversed their positions when they attracted controversy, but doubts remain. After all, why speak of containment, why appoint as defense secretary one who supports containment, if that’s not the actual policy?
This may also explain why, during his confirmation hearings, Hagel blurted out that he supported Obama’s policy of containment (before an aide rushed up to whisper to him that the administration opposed containment).
Third, Obama has repeatedly pressured Israel not to strike Iran despite verbally affirming its right to do so if its security needs dictate it. Vice President Biden has warned Israel against it, as has Obama’s handpicked chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff, General Martin Dempsey.
Fourth, Obama has a disturbing record on Iran sanctions. For over a year after taking office he did what he could to prevent a congressional vote on new sanctions. The 2010 UN Security Council sanctions Obama supported did not cover Iran’s vital oil, financial and insurance sectors and included exemptions for numerous countries – like China, which has huge contracts in Iran’s energy sector developing oil refineries, and Russia, which supplies S-300 surface-to-air missiles to Iran.
Obama sought to torpedo or weaken new and stronger congressional sanctions on Iran, even after these had been softened at his request, leading Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, to publicly and angrily criticize the administration.
In his 2012 AIPAC speech, Obama took credit for imposing sanctions on Iran’s Central Bank. Yet not only had he not implemented these sanctions at the time, he actually tried to slow their passage and dilute their strength. Now, when Iran has made no concessions at all but agreed to further talks, Obama, instead of maintaining the pressure achieved through existing sanctions, wants to weaken them and unfreeze some Iranian assets. Already in June he quietly lifted financial pressure, stopping the blacklisting of entities and individuals assisting Iran’s evasion of international sanctions.
Fifth, the Obama administration has damagingly publicized Israeli military and intelligence information, including regarding Israeli preparations to deal with Iran. This has included revelations in March 2013 about Israeli use of Azerbaijan airfields with regard to a possible operation against Iran.
Sixth, Obama has not altered course, no matter how bad the news from Iran. He says nothing – not on reports that Iran may now be able produce a nuclear weapon in as little as one month; not when Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei called Israel “illegitimate,” the U.S. “an enemy who smiles,” and insisted on no compromises on Iran’s alleged right to enrich uranium.
Obama also said nothing when seeing tens of thousands of Iranians rallying in Tehran, screaming “Death to America”; or when Tehran brutally suppressed demonstrations over rigged presidential elections in June 2009, observing only that the U.S. shouldn’t “meddle” – quite the opposite of his call in February 2011 for U.S. ally Egypt’s Hosni Mubarak to step down “now” when Egyptians demonstrated against his rule.
Seventh, Obama ignores the character and acts of the Iranian regime. He says nothing about its role in international terrorism, of which it is the leading state sponsor, its funding and arming Hamas, Hizbullah, Syria and others, its murder of scores of Jews in terrorist attacks in Argentina and assassinations of numerous Iranian dissidents and human rights activists abroad. He says nothing about Iran’s drive to develop bigger and better ICBMs, which can carry nuclear weapons and in a few years will have the range to strike America.
This is not a record that inspires any confidence that Obama means what he says when it comes to stopping Iran. Everyone concerned for the future security of the U.S. and Israel should be afraid, very afraid.Morton A. Klein and Dr. Daniel Mandel
About the Author: Morton A. Klein is national president of the Zionist Organization of America. Dr. Daniel Mandel is director of the ZOA's Center for Middle East Policy.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.