web analytics
September 22, 2014 / 27 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Selective Liberal Outrage Over Nazi Analogies


The loyalty of most American Jews to the Democratic Party and its current leader, President Barack Obama, is not in question. Yet while the ideology of the majority of their members and contributors is no secret, most major Jewish organizations, not to mention synagogues, attempt to stay out of partisan controversies, even while often espousing liberal causes. Most sensible people understand that these days, the Jews and Israel have friends on both sides of the aisle and it is bad politics as well as bad policy to forget that.

But some Democratic partisans want to eschew this common sense approach and to deploy the full force of organized American Jewry to demonize critics of the Obama administration. Their rationale is that some right-wing critics of Obama, and especially his plans to change America’s health care system, compared the president to Hitler and his programs to Nazism. Peter Keating of New York magazine recently wrote that Jewish groups ought to inject themselves into the health care debate on this shaky premise and wondered at their reluctance.

Such comparisons are, of course, not merely over-the-top insults but vile. Say what you will about the faults of ObamaCare as well as the absurd cult of personality that has grown up around the president but neither he nor his party can or should be compared to Nazis.

Obama is a preening puffed up poseur besotted with some very bad ideas but he is the elected leader of a democracy and no totalitarian. Hitler murdered six million Jews and launched a genocidal war that took the lives of tens of millions of others.

Any comparison between the two or of liberal Democrats with Nazis says everything about the people who make such comparisons and nothing about Obama. The simple rule for rational politics is that anyone who invokes Hitler loses the debate as well the respect of right-thinking citizens.

The promiscuous use of the word “Holocaust” to describe anything bad has gotten out of hand. Indeed, Keating notes that recently a Democratic member of Congress decried our current system of health care as a “Holocaust in America.”

But what liberal polemicists like Keating as well as other members of the Obama cheerleading squad want from Jewish groups is a full-court press by the entire organized Jewish world aimed at taking down Obama’s critics and effectively tarring all such dissenters from our Nobel laureate leader’s plans with the brush of extremism, if not anti-Semitism.

The goal of such a stand isn’t just to pass a bill they like but to intimidate all those who take the name of Obama in vain, not just people who foolishly circulate goofy e-mails about his place of birth or religion. It is opposition to ObamaCare and those who worry about Obama’s predilection for government power at home and appeasement of tyranny abroad that liberals wish to silence.

But if most Jewish groups, which – contrary to the myths propagated by the anti-Israel left – are mostly populated by mainstream liberals, are reluctant to join in this fray, they have good reason.

The most obvious reason is that while the general outrage heard from liberals about the nature of the criticism of Obama treats the use of Nazi analogies as something new, it isn’t. For the entire eight years of the administration of George W. Bush, such invective was commonplace.

There is virtually nothing nasty that has been put about by the nuts on the right about Obama that wasn’t already spewed by the left about Bush and Cheney. Liberals pretend there is something particularly dangerous about right-wingers who get up at town hall meetings and rant about expanding government power. But what exactly is the difference between such persons and many antiwar protesters who often used intemperate and insulting rhetoric about Bush as well as being just as contemptuous about the right of others to free speech?

Liberals chose not to notice the excesses of Code Pink provocateurs or the nonsense spouted by the Moveon.org crowd when they were portraying Bush and Cheney as totalitarians extinguishing the flame of American liberty. When, however, right-wingers behave badly it isn’t merely protesters losing perspective but the thin edge of a new wave of racism and anti-Semitism (the irony that the demonization of Israel is primarily a left-wing phenomenon is lost on those who make such accusations).

When left-wingers take to the streets, liberals say it is democracy in action, when right-wingers do the same; they invoke the shade of the Klan and Father Coughlin.

We are currently living through one of the most partisan moments in American history. Starting with Bill Clinton and proceeding through the presidencies of first Bush and now Obama, we have had chief executives who have induced what is rightly termed derangement among their critics. Both sides of the political divide are guilty at times of hypocritically judging their opponents more harshly than their allies.

Not very long ago some on the right were happy to brand Bush-bashers as un-American or unpatriotic, a stance liberals found intolerable since it blurred the very real distinction between extremists and mainstream dissent. Today, the left is trying to play the same game in dealing with Obama-bashers. But this is not a pastime in which those who claim to represent American Jewry should play a part.

While Jewish groups have an obligation to hold accountable those who employ Holocaust analogies, they would do well to stay out of the sort of partisan crossfire into which Obama’s foot soldiers would like to fling them.

About the Author: Jonathan S. Tobin is senior online editor of Commentary magazine and chief political blogger at www.commentarymagazine.com, where this first appeared. He can be reached via e-mail at jtobin@commentarymagazine.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Selective Liberal Outrage Over Nazi Analogies”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
ISIS seized control of Quneitra, at least temporarily, towards the end of August 2014.
Israel Watching Northern Border with Syria, Lebanon
Latest Indepth Stories
IDF lone soldier and  David Menachem Gordon (z"l).

Why has his death been treated by some as an invitation for an emotional “autopsy”?

Starck-091914

SWOT analysis: Assessing resources, internal Strengths&Weaknesses; external Opportunities&Threats.

Kohn-091914

Strategy? For the longest time Obama couldn’t be bothered to have one against a sworn enemy.

Miller-091914

Seventeen visual skills are needed for success in school, sports, and everyday life.

We started The Jewish Press. Arnie was an integral part of the paper.

Fear alone is substantial; without fusing it to beauty, fear doesn’t reach its highest potential.

Fortunate are we to have Rosh Hashanah for repentance, a shofar to awaken heavenly mercy.

Arab leaders who want the US to stop Islamic State are afraid of being dubbed traitors and US agents

National Lawyers Guild:Sworn enemy of Israel & the legal arm of Palestinian terrorism since the ’70s

A little less than 10 percent of eligible Democratic voters came out on primary day, which translates into Mr. Cuomo having received the support of 6.2 percent of registered Democrats.

The reality, though, is that the Israeli “war crimes” scenario will likely be played out among highly partisan UN agencies, NGOs, and perhaps even the International Criminal Court.

Peace or the lack of it between Israel and the Palestinians matters not one whit when it comes to the long-term agenda of ISIS and other Islamists, nor does it affect any of the long-running inter-Arab conflicts and wars.

Rather than serving as a deterrent against terrorist attacks, Israel’s military strength and capabilities are instead looked at as an unfair advantage in the asymmetrical war in which it finds itself.

Sisi:”The religious nature of the Middle East creates challenges for the governing authorities.”

More Articles from Jonathan S. Tobin
Bomb Shelter

One of the key talking points by apologists for Hamas in the current conflict is that it isn’t fair that Israelis under fire have bomb shelters while Palestinians in Gaza don’t have any. Among other factors, the lack of shelters accounts in part for the differences in casualty figures between the two peoples. But somehow […]

Jonathan S. Tobin is Senior Online Editor of Commentary magazine.

How will all this end? Hamas seems to think it will be Netanyahu who will blink first.

Nothing short of a stroke that will decapitate the leadership of this group will convince the Arabs that Hamas has made a mistake.

Z STREET will have the ability to compel IRS officials to testify as to their practices and produce all records.

“Death of Klinghoffer” opera frames the issue as Israel’s existence being the real crime.

Palestinian leaders claim the kidnapping is an Israeli hoax or the act of Jewish criminals rather than terrorists.

If Peres has outlasted some of his critics and is still considered popular, he cannot outrun history.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/selective-liberal-outrage-over-nazi-analogies/2009/10/21/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: