web analytics
February 1, 2015 / 12 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Blood On The Mizbeach


Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah discusses many different halachos that pertain to korbanos. Regarding the korban olah, the pasuk tells us that the entire animal must be brought on the mizbeach and is burned.

The Minchas Chinuch asks a simple question: How can the Torah command that the entire animal should be brought on the mizbeach when that will constitute that the blood of the animal would be brought up as well? After all, we know that the Torah has forbidden blood to be eaten. The Gemara states in several places that there is a concept called memashkeh Yisrael, which requires that only something fit for consumption by a Jew may be brought on the mizbeach. How then can the Torah require that the blood of the korban olah be brought on the mizbeach when it is biblically forbidden?

Although each korban was salted and the Gemara in Menachos 21a states an opinion that says that once blood is salted it is considered as if it were cooked and thus is no longer biblically forbidden (it is still forbidden mi’de’rabbanan), only several Rishonim hold this opinion. The Radvaz says that the Rambam and the Riff disagree, opining that even salted blood is biblically forbidden.

Even according to the Rishonim who opine that salted blood is only prohibited mi’de’rabbanan the question still remains, since the Gemara in Pesachim 48 says the rule of memashkeh Yisrael applies even to items that are not fit for consumption mi’de’rabbanan.

The Gemara in Chullin 90b discusses this issue. The Gemara quotes the Tanna, Rebbe, who asks how it is that the gid hanasheh may be brought on the mizbeach when it is not memashkeh Yisrael. Rebbe says that this is permitted because the rule of memashkeh Yisrael only prohibits something that comes from an entirely non-kosher animal. It is for this reason that the blood and the cheilev (forbidden fats) may be brought on the mizbeach, since they come from an otherwise kosher animal.

However, the Rabbanan disagree with Rebbe and say that the gid hanasheh may not be brought on the mizbeach. They say that one may not draw a proof from blood and cheilev to the gid hanasheh because, since the mitzvah must be done with the blood and the fats, the Torah obviously must have explicitly permitted it. Since the gid hanasheh may not have been permitted, one may not bring it on the mizbeach.

This does not answer the Minchas Chinuch’s question, for that Gemara is discussing the zereika (sprinkling) of the blood where the main part of the mitzvah is with the blood. But the Minchas Chinuch had asked from the haktarah whereby the blood is not the essential part of the mitzvah. Perhaps there the Torah had not meant to explicitly permit the blood on the mizbeach.

The Minchas Chinuch suggests a chiddush to answer his question. He says that every korban must be salted in order to remove the blood that was in the limbs. Afterwards, they would wash the limbs to remove any blood that was extrapolated by salt that remained there. Then they would salt the limbs a second time to fulfill the mitzvah of meleichah (salting). Salting was required a second time because once the limb was washed it was not considered a salted korban. Therefore it had to be salted a second time. Consequently there was no blood that was being offered on the mizbeach during the haktarah. Only during the zereika did they sprinkle blood on the mizbeach and, as explained earlier, The Torah explicitly permitted that.

Based on this he wants to answer a question of the Mishneh Lamelech. The Mishneh Lamelech asks: why does the Gemara in Menachos require a drasha from a pasuk that one may salt a korban on Shabbos? What is the melachah that one would transgress? Salting food is not a melachah; only when one salt skins is it prohibited under mi’abeid. But when the skin is part of a food, it is permitted – for the rule is that there is not eibud in food. The Minchas Chinuch suggests that in fact salting meat should also be prohibited, for it is also mefarek because one is separating the blood from the food.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Blood On The Mizbeach

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Handout photo of texted message sent by a fearful Christopher Cramer from Saudi Arabia before his death.
Saudis Hold Body of U.S. Elbit Subcontractor After Mysterious Death in Tabuk
Latest Judaism Stories
Staum-013015

People often think that all they are missing is “just a little more” and then they can be truly happy.

Torah-Hakehillah-121914

The Midrash is teaching a fundamental message of what it means to be a religious person.

Rabbi Sacks

Torah opposes slavery; G-d desires the free worship of free human beings, yet slavery’s permitted-?!

Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

France allowed Islamists to flourish despite their loyalty to Islamic sharia law not French values

Approximately 18 years ago, my uncle called me into his office saying he had an urgent matter to discuss. I didn’t know what he had in mind.

“Where is God?” asked the Kotzker Rebbe “God is not everywhere but only where you let Him enter”

An Explosion In The Trench
‘With A Glowing Hot Knife’
(Yevamos 120b)

Her first tactic was tefillah; she immediately began to recite one perek after another of Tehillim.

When a miracle occurs that transcends nature, Hashem has broken the laws of nature to create the miracle.

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

How can the Da’as Zekeinim say this was Hashem’s plan to allow them to become the Torah Nation? We know it was actually a punishment.

A strange midrash of fruit trees surrounding the Nation of Israel as they walked to freedom

Leading by example must be visible, regarding where, when and how-like Nachshon entering the Red Sea

Rabbi Yaakov Nagen, a Ram at Yeshivat Otniel, notes that the verse is suggesting that retelling the story of the Exodus is so important that Hashem is performing ever-greater miracles specifically so that parents can tell their stories to future generations.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

Rather than submit to this fate and suffer torture and humiliation, Shaul decided to fall on his sword.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

And if a person can take steps to perform the mitzvah, he should do so (even if he won’t be held accountable for not performing it due to circumstances beyond his control).

The Brisker Rav suggests that the barad, in fact, only fell on people, animals, and vegetation.

Why is it necessary to perform an aveirah punishable by lashes in order to be deemed a legal rashah and be pasul l’eidus m’d’Oraisa?

Why was Yaakov not afraid that granting Yosef’s sons the status of shevatim would cause jealousy among his children?

Rav Akiva Eiger is assuming that the logic of the halacha that both the son and his mother are obligated to honor his father and therefore he must honor his fathers wishes first, is a mathematical equation.

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/blood-on-the-mizbeach/2013/03/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: