web analytics
December 25, 2014 / 3 Tevet, 5775
 
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post
8000 meals Celebrate Eight Days of Chanukah – With 8,000 Free Meals Daily to Israel’s Poor

Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.



Home » Judaism » Parsha »

Blood On The Mizbeach


Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

This column is dedicated to the refuah sheleimah of Shlomo Eliezer ben Chaya Sarah Elka.

In this week’s parshah the Torah discusses many different halachos that pertain to korbanos. Regarding the korban olah, the pasuk tells us that the entire animal must be brought on the mizbeach and is burned.

The Minchas Chinuch asks a simple question: How can the Torah command that the entire animal should be brought on the mizbeach when that will constitute that the blood of the animal would be brought up as well? After all, we know that the Torah has forbidden blood to be eaten. The Gemara states in several places that there is a concept called memashkeh Yisrael, which requires that only something fit for consumption by a Jew may be brought on the mizbeach. How then can the Torah require that the blood of the korban olah be brought on the mizbeach when it is biblically forbidden?

Although each korban was salted and the Gemara in Menachos 21a states an opinion that says that once blood is salted it is considered as if it were cooked and thus is no longer biblically forbidden (it is still forbidden mi’de’rabbanan), only several Rishonim hold this opinion. The Radvaz says that the Rambam and the Riff disagree, opining that even salted blood is biblically forbidden.

Even according to the Rishonim who opine that salted blood is only prohibited mi’de’rabbanan the question still remains, since the Gemara in Pesachim 48 says the rule of memashkeh Yisrael applies even to items that are not fit for consumption mi’de’rabbanan.

The Gemara in Chullin 90b discusses this issue. The Gemara quotes the Tanna, Rebbe, who asks how it is that the gid hanasheh may be brought on the mizbeach when it is not memashkeh Yisrael. Rebbe says that this is permitted because the rule of memashkeh Yisrael only prohibits something that comes from an entirely non-kosher animal. It is for this reason that the blood and the cheilev (forbidden fats) may be brought on the mizbeach, since they come from an otherwise kosher animal.

However, the Rabbanan disagree with Rebbe and say that the gid hanasheh may not be brought on the mizbeach. They say that one may not draw a proof from blood and cheilev to the gid hanasheh because, since the mitzvah must be done with the blood and the fats, the Torah obviously must have explicitly permitted it. Since the gid hanasheh may not have been permitted, one may not bring it on the mizbeach.

This does not answer the Minchas Chinuch’s question, for that Gemara is discussing the zereika (sprinkling) of the blood where the main part of the mitzvah is with the blood. But the Minchas Chinuch had asked from the haktarah whereby the blood is not the essential part of the mitzvah. Perhaps there the Torah had not meant to explicitly permit the blood on the mizbeach.

The Minchas Chinuch suggests a chiddush to answer his question. He says that every korban must be salted in order to remove the blood that was in the limbs. Afterwards, they would wash the limbs to remove any blood that was extrapolated by salt that remained there. Then they would salt the limbs a second time to fulfill the mitzvah of meleichah (salting). Salting was required a second time because once the limb was washed it was not considered a salted korban. Therefore it had to be salted a second time. Consequently there was no blood that was being offered on the mizbeach during the haktarah. Only during the zereika did they sprinkle blood on the mizbeach and, as explained earlier, The Torah explicitly permitted that.

Based on this he wants to answer a question of the Mishneh Lamelech. The Mishneh Lamelech asks: why does the Gemara in Menachos require a drasha from a pasuk that one may salt a korban on Shabbos? What is the melachah that one would transgress? Salting food is not a melachah; only when one salt skins is it prohibited under mi’abeid. But when the skin is part of a food, it is permitted – for the rule is that there is not eibud in food. The Minchas Chinuch suggests that in fact salting meat should also be prohibited, for it is also mefarek because one is separating the blood from the food.

About the Author: For questions or comments, e-mail RabbiRFuchs@gmail.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Blood On The Mizbeach

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
King Abdullah II
Intel: Abdullah — the Last Hashemite King of Jordan
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

They stammer “I’m not Orthodox,” as if that absolves them from the responsibility of calling to G-d

Hanukiyah created by world famous Venetian Glass Blower

It’s fascinating how sources attain the status “traditional,” or its equivalent level of kashrus.

Lessons-in-Emunah-new

She was determined that the Law class was Dina’s best chance of finding a husband, and that was the real reason she wanted her to go to college.

Lessons-in-Emunah-new

But who would have ever guessed that Hashem would unlock the key to the birth on same day as the English anniversary of our wedding.

Rabbi Fohrman explores the question of how God communicates with us today.

A revolution is taking place between good and evil; light and darkness. Make the light activism!

What did Yehudah say that was so effective that it convinced Yosef to make himself known?

What does the way we count the days of Chanukah come to teach us about living in the present?

Israel projects global material illumination not always the light of “morality” meant by the Navi

To many of our brethren Chanukah has lost its meaning.

This ability to remain calm under pressure and continue to see the situation clearly is a hallmark of Yehuda’s leadership.

It would have been understandable for these great warriors to become dispirited.

The travail of Yosef was undoubtedly the greatest trauma of Yaakov’s life, which certainly knew its share of hardships.

Yosef, in interpreting the first set of dreams, performed in a manner that was clearly miraculous to all.

Chazal teach us that we need to be “sur may’rah v’asei tov,”avoid bad and do good.

When we celebrate the completion of learning a section of Torah, we recite the Hadran.

More Articles from Rabbi Raphael Fuchs
Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

It is clear that Tosafos maintains that only someone who lives in a house must light Chanukah candles.

Taste-of-Lomdus-logo

But how could there have been any validity to Yosef’s allegations?

If one converts for the sole purpose of marrying a Jew the conversion is invalid.

Rashi in Shabbos 9b writes that the reason why the tefillah of Ma’ariv is a reshus is because it was instituted corresponding to the burning of the eimurim from the korbanos – which was performed at night.

We find that in certain circumstances before the Torah was actually given, people were permitted to make calculations as to what would better serve Hashem, even if it were against a mitzvah or aveirah.

It is difficult to write about such a holy person, for I fear I will not accurately portray his greatness…

The implication of the Shulchan Aruch (Orach Chaim 233:2) is that one may not daven Minchah before six and one half hours into the day.

Some Rishonim are bothered by the opinion of the Rambam that bnei Noach are commanded not to eat basar min hachai.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/parsha/blood-on-the-mizbeach/2013/03/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: