web analytics
June 20, 2013 / 12 Tammuz, 5773
At a Glance ▼
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Bicycle in South Pioneers of the Periphery: Olim of the South

Got that pioneering spirit? You’re invited to help build Israel’s periphery by planting roots in southern soil with Nefesh B’Nefesh.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Three Questions For ‘Peace Process’ Supporters

Published: October 13th, 2010
tell a friend

   Sometimes the truth can be found in the oddest of places, if one knows where to look. Even in poll results.
 
   A new study by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research bears this out.
 
   Released last week, it raises three difficult questions for all those who continue to believe that Israel must make concessions to win peace with the Palestinians.
 
   For example, when asked about the August 31 terror attack near Hebron that left four Israelis dead, including a pregnant mother of six, a majority of Palestinians – 51 percent – said they supported the assault.
 
   Yes, you read that correctly. Most Palestinians surveyed had no difficulty declaring they backed a horrific act of murder against civilians.
 
   They had no qualms – moral or otherwise – about cheering a madman who opened fire and pumped bullets into a vehicle carrying Jews.
 
   So here’s question number one to supporters of further Israeli concessions:
 
   Do you really believe Israel can negotiate with people who applaud the slaughter of innocents?
 
   Not surprisingly, the results of this particular survey received little to no attention in the mainstream press. After all, it doesn’t sit too nicely with the narrative that much of the media has been selling us all these years about our supposed partners in peace.
 
   Can you imagine if a poll of Israelis had produced similar findings?
 
   Of course not – for the simple reason that we don’t believe in violence, terror and bloodshed.
 
   When it comes to the Palestinians, however, most observers seem to shrug off such results, as if they have little meaning.
 
   But that is most definitely not the case.
 
   Like it or not, the numbers speak volumes about the other side and its dubious commitment to ending the conflict and embracing reconciliation.
 
   But that’s not all the Palestinian survey revealed. It also found that 66 percent wanted the Palestinian leadership to pull out of the negotiations with Israel when the building freeze in Judea and Samaria expired.
 
   Clearly, the Palestinians are not very keen to reach a deal if they cannot countenance the continuation of talks just because they don’t get their way on everything.
 
   So here’s question number two to those who put the onus on Israel:
 
   How do you expect the Jewish state to make peace with people who are not even willing to continue to negotiate?
 
   Perhaps the most interesting numbers in the survey, however, had to do with the attitudes of Palestinians toward their leadership.
 
   Some 26 percent said the Hamas regime in Gaza was the legitimate Palestinian government, while 30 percent said Mahmoud Abbas and his associates in Ramallah are the rightful Palestinian leaders. Another 30 percent of Palestinians said they believe neither crew to be their legitimate representatives.
 
   In effect, this means Israel is busy trying to negotiate with a Palestinian Authority that fewer than one-third of Palestinians even recognize as their government – which should cast grave doubt about the value of any deal that might possibly be forged.
 
   And this brings us to question number three for the peace processors:
 
   How do you justify talking to a Palestinian leadership that does not enjoy the confidence of its own people?
 
   These queries, of course, are for the most part rhetorical. I have no doubt that most of those who still have faith in our ostensible partners are beyond the point where facts matter all that much.
 
   Nonetheless, there has got to be a limit as to how much reality they can continue to ignore, doesn’t there?
 
   In any event, for those of us with our eyes wide open and our minds still clear, it is essential to digest this information and be aware of what is going on around us.
 
   The peace process may sputter along, with talks on again and off again, depending on the political whims of the Obama administration, the Palestinian and Arab leadership, and the Israeli government.
 
   But don’t let the cautious optimism of Hillary Clinton or the measured cadences of George Mitchell fool you.
 
   Like it or not, our foes still hate us – very, very much.
 

   The rest, as they say, is commentary.

 

 

   Michael Freund is founder of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), a Jerusalem-based organization that helps “lost Jews” return to Zion. His Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month.

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
no comments

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
The FBI arrested two upstate New York men who came up with a stranger than fiction X-ray device to 'kill Israel's enemies'
KKK Member Tried to Sell X-Ray Weapon to Kill ‘Israel’s Enemies’
Latest Indepth Stories
Louis Rene Beres
InDepth → Columns → Louis Rene Beres

Starting next week, Professor Beres’s column will be on summer hiatus until September. * * * * * In June 1998, Prof. Beres, following publication of an op-ed article in The New York Times, was invited by then-Swiss Ambassador Thomas Borer to present personal testimony before the specially-constituted Swiss Commission on World War II in [...]

Gilor-Dov
InDepth → Columns → Focus on Israel/Dov Gilor

Israel is a country that understands security concerns. Many civil rights have been sacrificed in the name of security and Israelis are used to being checked every time they enter a shopping center, a large store or any public building. Americans recently learned that they, too, are subject to many checks on their most private activities.

Netanyahu shaking Arafat's hand upon handing the Palestinians most of Hebron.
InDepth → Columns → Moshe Feiglin

Without a vision, strategy is impossible. Tactics become farcical.

InDepth → Editorial

No one can envy President Obama’s current dilemma over Syria.

His decision to begin arming the Syrian rebels challenging Bashar Assad’s regime drew charges that the rebel forces are driven by jihad movements, particularly al Qaeda. Further, many rebel spokesmen have regularly denounced Israel and suggested that once in power they will end Mr. Assad’s policy of not rocking the boat with Israel. How, then, critics ask, could the president align the U.S. with the rebels?

InDepth → Editorial

In a gushing report on the election of Hassan Rohani as Iran’s new president, The New York Times began with this: “In a striking repudiation of the ultraconservatives who wield power in Iran, voters…overwhelmingly elected a mild-mannered cleric who advocates greater personal freedoms and a more conciliatory approach to the world.”

InDepth → Editorial

Last month in this space we noted that the New York State Assembly was considering legislation that would prohibit domestic insurers from including on their financial statements investments in companies that engage in investment activities in Iran. These financial statements are relied upon by the state to determine whether the company is solvent and able to pay claims. That bill has since passed the Assembly, but the New York State Senate is balking at passing it as well.

InDepth → Op-Eds

There is no other candidate running for mayor who supports our community’s values as Salgado does.

InDepth → Front Page

If the eyes are the window to the soul, then children’s eyes are the window to the Almighty Himself.

InDepth → Analysis

Adding Turkey to the list of volatile states would mean even more uncertainty for Israel.

InDepth → Op-Eds

Making Rouhani the president was a brilliant strategic move for Khamene’i.

InDepth → Columns → America's Rabbi / Shmuley Boteach

Noone, least of all me, wants to see any Arab child suffer, God forbid.

InDepth → Personal

The Sanctuary was built with an ezrat nashim, a separate area for women.

InDepth → Op-Eds

The 686 men who expressed their desire to run in Iran’s presidential election were whittled down to 8.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513
InDepth → Front Page

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly
InDepth → Media Monitor

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

InDepth → Media Monitor

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

InDepth → Media Monitor

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

InDepth → Interviews and Profiles

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

InDepth → Media Monitor

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

InDepth → Media Monitor

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

InDepth → Media Monitor

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    Female, Orthodox, Halachic Deciders and Spiritual Leaders (Maharat)









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/three-questions-for-peace-process-supporters/2010/10/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

No related posts.

Close