web analytics
September 22, 2014 / 27 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Three Questions For ‘Peace Process’ Supporters

   Sometimes the truth can be found in the oddest of places, if one knows where to look. Even in poll results.
 
   A new study by the Ramallah-based Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research bears this out.
 
   Released last week, it raises three difficult questions for all those who continue to believe that Israel must make concessions to win peace with the Palestinians.
 
   For example, when asked about the August 31 terror attack near Hebron that left four Israelis dead, including a pregnant mother of six, a majority of Palestinians – 51 percent – said they supported the assault.
 
   Yes, you read that correctly. Most Palestinians surveyed had no difficulty declaring they backed a horrific act of murder against civilians.
 
   They had no qualms – moral or otherwise – about cheering a madman who opened fire and pumped bullets into a vehicle carrying Jews.
 
   So here’s question number one to supporters of further Israeli concessions:
 
   Do you really believe Israel can negotiate with people who applaud the slaughter of innocents?
 
   Not surprisingly, the results of this particular survey received little to no attention in the mainstream press. After all, it doesn’t sit too nicely with the narrative that much of the media has been selling us all these years about our supposed partners in peace.
 
   Can you imagine if a poll of Israelis had produced similar findings?
 
   Of course not – for the simple reason that we don’t believe in violence, terror and bloodshed.
 
   When it comes to the Palestinians, however, most observers seem to shrug off such results, as if they have little meaning.
 
   But that is most definitely not the case.
 
   Like it or not, the numbers speak volumes about the other side and its dubious commitment to ending the conflict and embracing reconciliation.
 
   But that’s not all the Palestinian survey revealed. It also found that 66 percent wanted the Palestinian leadership to pull out of the negotiations with Israel when the building freeze in Judea and Samaria expired.
 
   Clearly, the Palestinians are not very keen to reach a deal if they cannot countenance the continuation of talks just because they don’t get their way on everything.
 
   So here’s question number two to those who put the onus on Israel:
 
   How do you expect the Jewish state to make peace with people who are not even willing to continue to negotiate?
 
   Perhaps the most interesting numbers in the survey, however, had to do with the attitudes of Palestinians toward their leadership.
 
   Some 26 percent said the Hamas regime in Gaza was the legitimate Palestinian government, while 30 percent said Mahmoud Abbas and his associates in Ramallah are the rightful Palestinian leaders. Another 30 percent of Palestinians said they believe neither crew to be their legitimate representatives.
 
   In effect, this means Israel is busy trying to negotiate with a Palestinian Authority that fewer than one-third of Palestinians even recognize as their government – which should cast grave doubt about the value of any deal that might possibly be forged.
 
   And this brings us to question number three for the peace processors:
 
   How do you justify talking to a Palestinian leadership that does not enjoy the confidence of its own people?
 
   These queries, of course, are for the most part rhetorical. I have no doubt that most of those who still have faith in our ostensible partners are beyond the point where facts matter all that much.
 
   Nonetheless, there has got to be a limit as to how much reality they can continue to ignore, doesn’t there?
 
   In any event, for those of us with our eyes wide open and our minds still clear, it is essential to digest this information and be aware of what is going on around us.
 
   The peace process may sputter along, with talks on again and off again, depending on the political whims of the Obama administration, the Palestinian and Arab leadership, and the Israeli government.
 
   But don’t let the cautious optimism of Hillary Clinton or the measured cadences of George Mitchell fool you.
 
   Like it or not, our foes still hate us – very, very much.
 

   The rest, as they say, is commentary.

 

 

   Michael Freund is founder of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), a Jerusalem-based organization that helps “lost Jews” return to Zion. His Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Three Questions For ‘Peace Process’ Supporters”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Ex-KKK Wizard David Duke.
Five Anti-Zionist Doctors ‘Hijack’ Medical Journal to Dump on Israel
Latest Indepth Stories
Cannabis Greenhouse

Research shows that high doses of marijuana can produce acute psychotic reactions, lower IQ in teens

donny pic

The current missionary problem in Samaria is still relatively unknown throughout Israel&to most Jews

Jewish Holidays' Guide for the Perplexed

Rosh Hashanah is a universal, stock-taking, renewal and hopeful holiday,

The New York Times building is only the cover page for what goes

No mutual clash between parties, it was Jews repeatedly attacked by Arabs, not the other way around.

Israel would love to be in the coalition,but it’s never going to happen, because, in the end, most of America’s allies would walk away if Israel were on board officially.

Why has his death been treated by some as an invitation for an emotional “autopsy”?

SWOT analysis: Assessing resources, internal Strengths&Weaknesses; external Opportunities&Threats.

Strategy? For the longest time Obama couldn’t be bothered to have one against a sworn enemy.

Seventeen visual skills are needed for success in school, sports, and everyday life.

We started The Jewish Press. Arnie was an integral part of the paper.

Fear alone is substantial; without fusing it to beauty, fear doesn’t reach its highest potential.

Fortunate are we to have Rosh Hashanah for repentance, a shofar to awaken heavenly mercy.

Arab leaders who want the US to stop Islamic State are afraid of being dubbed traitors and US agents

National Lawyers Guild:Sworn enemy of Israel & the legal arm of Palestinian terrorism since the ’70s

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

Presidential-Seal-062014

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Readers who’ve stuck with the Monitor over the years will forgive this rerun of sorts, but as we approach the fortieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War – and with the stench of presidential indecisiveness hanging so heavily over Washington these days – it seemed only appropriate to revisit Richard Nixon’s role in enabling Israel to recover from the staggering setbacks it suffered in the first week of fighting.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/three-questions-for-peace-process-supporters/2010/10/13/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: