web analytics
March 1, 2015 / 10 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Monitor »

Anti-McCarthy McCarthyism


Media-Monitor-logo

Joe McCarthy was in the news last week, and once again the Monitor took due note of the fact that the late senator from Wisconsin - certainly when compared with his more hysterical critics – was a mere piker in the fine art of innuendo and allegation.

The Monitor has always been fascinated with the way the McCarthy period is portrayed in the liberal media and among left-wing academics, particularly in light of what is now known about the control exerted by Moscow over the American Communist Party and the extent of Soviet espionage here in the middle decades of the 20th century.

What makes the McCarthy business a case study in liberal denial and media mendacity is that even after the fall of the Soviet Union and the declassification of cables and documents from both sides of the Cold War, far too many journalists operate in an ideological time warp, their stories seemingly filed not in 2003 but in 1975 – complete with that era’s obligatory backdrop of revisionist historians earnestly blaming the U.S. for the world’s ills and American credibility festering at an all-time low in the wake of Vietnam and Watergate.

The latest example of this phenomenon came last week when Senate historian Donald Ritchie released nearly 5,000 pages of executive hearings conducted by McCarthy some 50 years ago. Ritchie, who edited the transcripts, understandably trumpeted the material as groundbreaking, and lazy reporters and editorial writers repeated verbatim his claim that the papers reveal once and for all that “McCarthy had shopworn goods and fishing expeditions.”

Problem is, there was hardly anything new in the documents. What’s more, as Wes Vernon pointed out on Newsmax.com, “The Senate historian, whose pronouncements trashing the late Sen. Joseph McCarthy are widely quoted in the mainstream media, could not cite one instance in which the senator’s alleged ‘browbeating’ of witnesses ruined lives.

“Nor could the leading senators on the Senate Government Operations Committee who repeated the rhetoric as they unsealed closed-door McCarthy hearings after 50 years.

“Nor could several of the journalists who wrote stories this week accepting the historian’s rewrite of history as fact.”

(Vernon was referring to efforts by M. Stanton Evans, an expert on the McCarthy era, to get someone – anyone – involved in the release of the papers to substantiate the statement, jointly
released by Senators Carl Levin and Susan Collins, that McCarthy’s methods “destroyed the careers of people who were not involved in the infiltration of our government.” None could.)

The New York Post’s Eric Fettmann, whose columns are a must read for any political junkie, views last week’s brouhaha as just the latest evidence that “the left is looking to rewrite the history of this complex and misunderstood period.”

Nevertheless, Fettmann notes, “growing historical evidence underscores that, whatever his rhetorical and investigative excesses - and they were substantial – McCarthy was a lot closer to the truth about Communism than were his foes.”

By the way, one thing old Joe was not – though political enemies like the late Stalinoid hack I.F. Stone tried to portray him as such – was an anti-Semite.

In his well regarded McCarthy biography “A Conspiracy So Immense,” David Oshinsky notes that “[McCarthy] never engaged in anti-Semitic diatribes or made the loaded connection between Jews and left-wing radicalism. Despite the unrelenting hostility of organized Jewry to his crusade, McCarthy still praised the state of Israel [and] condemned the Soviet persecution of Jews.”

Political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg concurs, writing in his book “The Fatal Embrace” that -the McCarthyites had no use for anti-Semitism as a political weapon. Indeed, several of McCarthy’s most important aides…were themselves Jews.”

And Abba Eban, in his memoir “Personal Witness,” recalled that McCarthy once summoned him to his Senate office and asked to be included on the list of sponsors of a congressional resolution urging Israel’s inclusion in U.S. foreign aid legislation. “Israel and the Jews,” Eban wrote, “never became a target of McCarthy’s denunciations.”

Jason Maoz can be reached at jmaoz@jewishpress.com

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press. He can be contacted at jmaoz@jewishpress.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Anti-McCarthy McCarthyism”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Obama is facing double trouble - the Senate and Netanyahu.
Obama on Collision Course with Senate Bill on Iran Deal
Latest Indepth Stories
israel-day-parade-bds

Buried in the tax-returns of the JCF is millions of dollars funneled to NIF in the last few years.

Netanyahu in a previous address to Congress-

Bibi’s speech to Congress will bring respect and honor to the Jewish Nation from the US & the world

Korenblit-022715

Obama & Putin have handwriting/signature clues indicating differences between public & private life

Councilman David Greenfield

It’s time for a new Jewish policy regarding Ramallah, NOT just because of the yarmulke incident

“GETT’s” being screened for Israeli Rabbinical Court judges at their annual convention.

If Jackson were alive he’d denounce Democratic party’s silence towards virulent anti-Semitism

Victim of Palestinian Arab terrorism, a victor in NY federal court, after years of being ignored by Justice Dept.

March 2013: Arabs hurled stones hitting the Biton’s car; Adele’s mother swerved the car-into a truck

The real issue is that in many respects the president has sought to recalibrate American values and our system of government.

Former Connecticut senator Joe Lieberman, writing in the Washington Post on Sunday, provided one of the clearest and most compelling analyses we’ve seen of the importance of the prime minister’s speech.

A central concept in any discussion about happiness is achieving clarity. “Ain simcha ela k’hataras hasefeikos” – there is no joy as that experienced with the removal of doubt.

“Je Suis..,” like its famous origin 400 years ago, implies the ability & freedom to think & question

Many anti-Israel demonstrations at universities have a not-so-latent anti-Semitic agenda as well

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, both outspokenly critical of Netanyahu’s upcoming visit to Congress, were wowed by him in 2011.

Note also the response to the speech by the top Democrats in the House and Senate, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, both of whom have been outspoken in their criticism of Netanyahu’s upcoming visit.

Comptroller DiNapoli celebrates Sukkot with Crown Heights Jewish community leaders at the sukkah of Rabbi Chanina Sperlin of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council.

The New York State comptroller manages the state’s $180.7 billion pension fund, audits the spending practices of all state agencies and local governments, oversees the New York State and Local Retirement System, reviews the New York State and City budgets, and approves billions in State contracts and spending.

While not all criticism of Israel stemmed from anti-Semitism, Podhoretz contends the level of animosity towards Israel rises exponentially the farther left one moved along the spectrum.

When you grow up in a home where your parents went through what my parents went through, you realize that life has to be meaningful. You have to be there for other people.

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/anti-mccarthy-mccarthyism/2003/06/11/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: