web analytics
July 2, 2015 / 15 Tammuz, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Can Educational Programming Lead to Shabbat Desecration?


Shabbat Morning

Shabbat Morning
Photo Credit: MiriamAlster/Flash90

Informal Jewish educational work often demands dealing with situations that are complex halakhically, spiritually and socially. A common problem arises when arranging Shabbat educational programs for participants who are not Shabbat observant. Arranging programming on Shabbat itself is of prime educational importance for obvious reasons, but can easily bring about Shabbat desecration when participants drive or are driven to activities. A similar dilemma arises in social situations; when invited for a Shabbat meal, friends or relatives who are not Shabbat-observant may very likely arrive by car during Shabbat. Although the problem is multi-faceted, we will focus mainly on the halakhic issues involved.

LIFNEI IVEIR

Rav Moshe Feinstein relates to our issue in Igrot Moshe OC vol.I, responsa #98 and #99 (pp. 159-160). Rav Moshe writes [in response to a question (#98) posed by Rav Aryeh Kaplan] that one who invites people who drive on Shabbat to participate in a minyan, transgresses the prohibition of “Lifnei iveir lo titein mikhshol” (Do not place a stumbling block in front of the blind) because of his involvement in their Shabbat desecration. He goes a step further in responsum #99 and claims that besides transgressing lifnei iveir, one who invites another to do something that inevitably involves desecration of Shabbat is defined as a “meisit” (one who incites another to sin – see below for a discussion).

The Torah prohibits facilitating a transgression by one who is obligated to keep the Torah’s laws but does not realize this, or who is temporarily “blinded” by the inclination not to follow the Torah’s laws. The main talmudic source on this transgression is a passage in Avoda Zara (6b):

“How do we know that one should not pass a cup of wine to a nazirite (who has vowed against drinking it)?… The Torah teaches us [that this is prohibited] when it says, ‘Do not place a stumbling block in front of the blind’…. When does this prohibition apply? When you and the nazirite are standing on two opposite sides of a river.”

“Lifnei iveir,” according to the gemara, does not apply when the nazirite does not need any assistance to commit his transgression ( = the nazirite and the cup of wine are on the same side of the river). Only facilitating another’s transgression by exposing him to a new, previously non-existent possibility is considered “lifnei iveir.”

There are, though, two limitations to the “same side of the river” clause:

1. The Mishneh La-melekh in Hilkhot Malveh Ve-loveh claims that it is permissible only if the transgressor could have accomplished his goals without any assistance at all. If, however, the nazirite cannot commit a sin without assistance, but there are two Jews available to give him his cup of wine from the other side of the river, it is prohibited for both of them to hand it to him. Lifnei iveir still applies when the sinner needs help and the only question is WHO will provide it; it is forbidden to be the person who provides the help. Some Acharonim claim that the Bach disagrees with the Mishneh La-melekh’s principle.

2. The “same side of the river” clause might be applicable only when the transgressor has a LIVE OPTION to achieve his goals without assistance, not when he just has the POTENTIAL to transgress by himself.

However, it is clear that in our situation the biblical prohibition of lifnei iveir does NOT apply, because the non-observant Jew does not need any assistance in order to drive on Shabbat and his ability to do so is a live option. Inviting him to come to a minyan may prompt him to drive and this would be a problem of meisit according to Rav Moshe. However, lifnei iveir is not a problem, since the invitation does not open him up to any new options of Shabbat desecration that were not open to him beforehand.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “Can Educational Programming Lead to Shabbat Desecration?”

  1. Why is there so much trouble with the concept of Shabbat suddenly?

  2. After 65 years sabbath became a problem?
    Careful with Hashem wrath.
    Keep the sabbath is morally correct.
    Never forget Hashem , took 2000 years to get the land back. Wise up.

  3. Jesse Long says:

    I wish we could get rid of educational television requirements on Saturday (the REAL Sabbath) in the USA because they either promote boring, New Age/evolution/similar minded junk or crummy infomercials. I want to see fights and coyotes going splat while chasing road runners again.

  4. Eva Feld says:

    What happened to the words "Six days you shall work….?" Why does the Diaspora have to observe 8 days of Passover and Israel seven? The Torah states, "seven" — Yes, I do know my history and it had something to do with the Sh'lichim" who came to ask for money from the Diaspora. But the Torah still says " Sox days…." Or La'olam?? How the might NIS won, for now.

  5. These rulings seem complicated until you understand why the distinctions are being made. It's not often that you see religious leaders promoting understanding of the law along with the law. Where some only see the forest through the trees, others seek to know the trees within the forest, and while the first may be the one we think see the bigger picture, it's actually the one who understands the tree that really gets the forest.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Gerstenfeld-070315
Will Defeating Islamic State Take More Than A Generation?
Latest Indepth Stories
Gerstenfeld-070315

What if years from now, IS were to control substantial territory? What world havoc would that wreak?

Rabbi Yeheskel Lebovic

Rambam writes the verse’s double term refers to 2 messiahs: first King David; 2nd the final Mashiach

The Marianne boat, carrying humanitarian aid such, as a single and useless solar panel.

The Gaza flotilla has been rightfully and legally blocked by Israel’s Navy, with greetings from Bibi

The president described the attack as “an act that drew on a long history of bombs and arson and shots fired at churches, not random, but as a means of control, a way to terrorize and oppress…”

“The only [candidate] that’s going to give real support to Israel is me,” said the 69-year-old Trump.

And whereas at the outset the plan was that Iran would have to surrender most of its centrifuges, it will now be able to retain several thousand.

Now oil independent, US no longer needs its former strategic alliances with Gulf States-or Israel

In addition to the palace’s tremendous size it was home to the “hanging gardens,” which were counted among the seven wonders of the ancient world.

Rather than asserting Jewish rights on Temple Mount or protecting Jewish lives Israel chooses soccer

Nothing in the NEW Paris Proposal differs much from what was offered by Olmert and rejected by Abbas

No longer will delegitimization efforts go unchallenged. That’s a silence we will continue to break.

Increasingly, Sweden is becoming a country where anti-Semitism & supporting terrorism is acceptable.

Rabbi Pfeffer points out that at his site, there are no one-line answers. “We want to show the people we’re interested in their questions,” he says.

The problem with US treatment of Israel did not start with Obama but with birth of Jewish State

More Articles from Yeshivat Har Etzion
Yeshivat Har Etzion in Alon Shvut, Israel.

According to the Maharal, Sedomites’ inability to perform chesed catalyzed their fall into a pit of immorality.

The Kotel in Jerusalem, Israel on Dec. 14, 2013.

There are two elements to the name “Jerusalem,” which must be unified for the City to exist.

Rav Soloveitchik asserted that Shavuot is sanctified not only by the court’s counting, but even by the individual’s counting.

The question of Jewish identity, for example, has been greatly affected by the legacy of the Holocaust.

If itis a mitzva to eat matza all Pesach, then why is there no berakha attached to it?

At our seder we emulate the way it was celebrated in Temple times, as if the Temple still stood.

The sacred flames of passion between the Jewish people and the Almighty expressed in Shir Ha-Shirim.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/can-educational-programming-lead-to-shabbat-desecration/2014/03/25/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: