Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event
No doubt inspired by the perverse Holocaust conference sponsored two years ago by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, student members of the Islamist Basij militia published a book of cartoons mocking and minimizing the Shoah just in time for a festive distribution at a Tehran rally for Al-Quds Day. The annual hate-fest glorifies the Palestinian cause and is an opportunity for Iranians to wildly denounce Israel and America and bemoan the continuing presence of Jews in Jerusalem.
The 108-page book of 52 crude cartoons and satire, which evolved from a 2006 cartoon exhibition and competition, similarly has as its purpose to question the validity of the Holocaust itself, offering, according to the official Iranian news agency, “historical orientation on the Holocaust fiction and analyses of this historic distortion.”
Iranian and Arab Holocaust denial has been growing, and particularly as part of Ahmadinejad’s own strategy, as it has proven to be an effective tool for satisfying some of the same motives of deniers in America and Europe – namely, further insulting the memory of human tragedy and torturing both the living and the perished by second-guessing the extent, nature, or even certitude of the Final Solution.
But where traditional deniers have stopped there – even as they condemn the Jews in general for perpetrating a great lie for the purpose of evoking the world’s continued sympathy and moral and financial support – the Muslim world has taken this revisionist effort to another level, accusing Zionism of creating and perpetuating the Holocaust lie for the express purpose of justifying Israel’s creation and the subsequent subjugation, persecution, and “ethnic cleansing” of the Palestinians.
Thus, the Holocaust as myth serves a politically healing purpose for Iranians that no Western denier has needed to seek. Muslims, who do not care to mend the reputation of the Third Reich or defend its other nationalistic achievements by denying its role in the extermination of European Jewry, do want the reality, the actual occurrence of the Holocaust, to be proven false – if for no other reason than it would diminish most of Israel’s moral capital by eliminating the cataclysmic social and political event that led the world to accept and endorse the creation of a Jewish state.
It is also a politically expedient accomplishment to position the Palestinians as the ultimate victims among victimized peoples, and this is much easier without the inexpressible evil of the Holocaust as a core element of Israel’s tragic heritage. “After all,” as Jonathan Eric Lewis has written, “if Zionism manufactured the lie of the Holocaust, then the Arab world, in exposing the lie, can view itself as the double victim of European imperialism and Zionist propaganda about European history.”
If the victim status of Israel, and by extension all Jews, can be diminished by exposing the “lie” of the Holocaust, the Palestinians become the more aggrieved victims, a people victimized by former victims, the Jews, who spread the lie of their own suffering for material ends. Thus, for Ahmadinejad and other deniers, “denying the atrocity,” Michael Shermer and Alex Grobman put it, “denies any moral authority to victims of the atrocity.”
It is not without irony, of course, that while Ahmadinejad, not to mention Israel-haters in the West, want to rob Jews of the piece of dismal history that brought about the extermination of six million of their people, they are eager to repeat regularly the vile comparison they draw between the perceived behavior and shared values of the Zionist state and the Nazi regime.
Ahmadinejad and his like-minded brethren in the Muslim world have a secondary motive for resenting the actuality of the Holocaust, which initially conferred on Israel victim status and gained the world’s sympathy. If the Iranian president can point to a great lie that led to Israel’s creation, if he can ascribe to Israel a conspiratorial and exploitive deception that garnered the world’s financial and moral support for the “Zionist regime,” as he is fond of calling it, he can also dismiss the successes of the democratic Israeli state and help explain why Iran’s own society and culture have languished in comparison: Jewish wile and duplicity.
Whether or not people believe the Holocaust actually took place is, for Ahmadinejad and other Jew-haters, immaterial; more important for them is slandering and causing hurt to Israelis, and in the most cruel and hateful way, by accusing them of having turned into a nation that practices genocide and engages in inhuman barbarism – just like the Nazis did.
How better to cause the greatest hurt and to speak the gravest criticism than to deny or minimize that the Nazi atrocities and slaughter ever took place, and then to suggest, that if they did, the people reborn of that fire have descended morally to the same moral level as their former tormenters?
For some in the Arab world, anti-Semitism – and, by extension, Israel hatred – is still the stupid answer for why things go wrong in the world. It is a worldview that creates conspiracies as a way of explaining the unfolding of historical events; it is a pessimistic and frantic outlook, characterized in 1964 by historian Richard Hofstadter as “the paranoid style” of politics, which shifts responsibility from the self to sinister, omnipotent others – typically and historically the Jews.
The overarching objective of Iranian-sponsored Holocaust-themed conferences, cartoon exhibits, student-produced hate literature – of deniers in general – is to expose this vast conspiracy that only they see and once and for all show how, in a fraud perpetrated over the course of some 60 years, the “Zionist regime” has duped the world with a hoax of such perfidy that it has helped create an “immoral” state of Israel at the expense of Arab states and the ever-victimized Palestinians.
They yearn to peel away Jewish “deceit” and rewrite their own history – this time with themselves, not Jews, as the victims, and no longer made to pay the price of Nazism’s treachery by having to define themselves in the mirror of another people’s own tragic history.
About the Author: Richard L. Cravatts, Ph.D., author of “Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel & Jews,” is president of Scholars for Peace in the Middle East.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state
Blaming Israel for the violence in Gaza, he ends up justifying Hamas’s terrorism.
In the Thirties it was common for anti-Semites to call on Jews to “go to Palestine!”
“This arbitrary ban is an ugly stain on our democracy, and it also undermines the rule of law.”
We take US “aid” for psychological reasons-if we have an allowance, that means we have a father.
ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.
Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.
The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.
And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?
Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.
The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.
We were quite disappointed with many of the points the secretary-general offered in response.
Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.
The multiculturalism that animates the hate-Israel crowd is sprinkled with code words of oppression
The cynical, and historically and factually inaccurate, view has meant leftists frequently denounce Western democracies as imperialistic, racist, militaristic oppressors.
What was unique about the MLA’s and the ASA’s approach was the breathtakingly Orwellian notion that not only was Israel itself guilty of the many alleged transgressions assigned to it by its libelers, but a boycott against Israeli academics was warranted because the academic establishment itself is complicit in Zionism’s excesses and a core element of the bemoaned occupation, oppression, and denial of Palestinian self-determination.
The ASA has obviously overlooked the pathology of Palestinian society.
The Teachers’ Union of Ireland (TUI), which represents some 14,500 members, voted in early April “to cease all cultural and academic collaboration with Israel, including the exchange of scientists, students and academic personalities, as well as cooperation in research programmes [sic].”
As an example of what the insightful commentator Melanie Phillips referred to as a “dialogue of the demented” in her book The World Turned Upside Down, Northeastern University’s chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), paralleling the moral incoherence of anti-Israel activists demonstrating elsewhere in American and European cities, sponsored a November 15 Boston rally in support of Gaza and, presumably, its genocidal thugocracy, Hamas.
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas recently continued a long tradition of attempting to question a Jewish link to Jerusalem by expressing his mendacious notion that “Jerusalem’s identity is Arab, and the city’s and Christian holy sites must be protected from Israeli threats.”
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/irans-political-motivation-for-ridiculing-the-holocaust/2008/10/22/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: