web analytics
March 31, 2015 / 11 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

No Substitute For Victory


Recently, after I’d given back examinations in one of my classes, one student who received a failing grade laughed, showed the exam to students on each side, and laughed again.

Former Alabama football coach Paul “Bear” Bryant said, “I hate to lose worse than anyone … but if you lose with humility you can come back” a winner.

I recalled how I felt when I got my only “F” as an undergraduate at the University of Alabama. The first time I took botany, I failed. Admittedly, the reproductive life of moss was way down on my interests list (and still is) so I invariably studied everything else before turning to botany, and then I usually fell asleep.

Back then, professors posted final grades by your student number. Accordingly, I went to the set of Dorian columns on the porch of the science building, found my student number and then stared incomprehensibly at the big “F” by mine. Although I knew my average was 44 going into the final, I thought surely the professor would curve the grades. I was wrong, and I also was ashamed. The next semester I hired a tutor, recopied my notes after each class, and garnered an unspectacular, hard-earned “C+.”

A few years later, on April 30, 1975, after serving in Vietnam and as a nuclear targeting officer with the Strategic Air Command, I was in northern Virginia waiting for a bus to take me to the Pentagon where I had just been assigned to the Air Staff. In those days military personnel posted to Washington had the option of wearing civilian clothes, since people in uniform often found themselves the targets of verbal and, occasionally, physical abuse. As I waited for the bus, I overheard a conversation by two young men with stylishly long hair who waited with me.

“Did you see the news? Looks like Saigon’s done for.”

“Yeah,” laughed his companion, “it was a great war to lose.”

His joke … South Vietnam’s country.

It took our fathers’ generation three years and four months to defeat Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan. From December 7, 1941 until August 15, 1945, our soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines, along with the American people, focused on total victory and forcing our enemies’ unconditional surrender.

Two days after the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt, in a broadcast to the American people stated, “I repeat, the American people can accept no result save victory, final and complete.” Three years and eight months later, Allied and Red Army divisions occupied Germany, Italy was liberated and Japan’s cities smoldered after relentless and merciless fire bombing raids and two atomic strikes.

Six short years later, in April 1951, with American forces stalemated in Korea, General Douglas MacArthur, in a letter to Congressman Joseph Martin, wrote, “In war there can be no substitute for victory.”

President Harry Truman deemed insubordinate this statement of the obvious and relieved MacArthur of command. Fifty-six years later, 30,000 American troops remain on alert along a tense border between North and South Korea while diplomats attempt to bribe one of the world’s last communist dictators into not producing nuclear weapons.

During the Vietnam War, many of the sons and daughters of what Tom Brokaw dubbed “the Greatest Generation” responded to John F. Kennedy’s call to “bear any burden, meet any hardship … to assure the survival and the success of liberty” with “Hell no! We won’t go!” Is it any wonder that their children and grandchildren laugh at failure?

America’s enemies in this total, global religious war are determined to destroy the West. Instead of responding with steely-eyed determination focused clearly on annihilating a foe intent on annihilating us, too many Americans dither about the treatment of illegal enemy combatants detained at Guantanamo Bay while Congressional leaders declare ad nauseam that “the war is lost” and an outfit like Moveon.org accuses the commanding general in Iraq of betraying the nation.

A nation is a conglomerate of its citizenry. Any nation consisting of citizens who embrace defeat will be a nation of losers. Al Qaeda, Hizbullah, and their sponsors in Damascus and Tehran intend to take the world back to a medieval Islamist caliphate. Whether it is Sunni or Shi’ite does not matter because Christians and Jews, Buddhists, Hindus and atheists will either be converted, enslaved or dead.

If Americans do not put aside their tolerance for losing and their infatuation with self-criticism and national-denigration and focus instead on winning, Western civilization will lose this war. Winston Churchill told the House of Commons on May 13, 1940, “Victory at all costs, victory in spite of all terror, victory however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.”

Amen.

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “No Substitute For Victory”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
More than 40 were killed in the bombing of a Yemeni refugee camp by the Saudi-led strike force.
Attack on Yemeni Refugees Makes Israel Look Like the Girl Scouts
Latest Indepth Stories
hurva

The rededication of the Hurva caused international hysteria.Arabs called the action a “provocation”

Photo from President Barack Obama's past visit to Israel and the Palestinian Authority.

{Originally posted to author’s website, FirstOne Through} TRUST Trust is the bedrock of a functional relationship. It enables one party to rely on the other. A trust that includes both intention and capability permits a sharing of responsibility and workload. The relationship between US President Obama and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu started off badly and further […]

jabotinsky with sword

Jabotinsky said “Go To Hell” was a good retort to opponents of the Jewish people; fitting for Obama.

Obama Racine

Obama pulled off one of US history’s greatest cons,twice fooling a gullible electorate and most Jews

While in Auschwitz I felt a tangible intensity. I could sense that I was in a place of sheer evil.

Obama needs to wake up. The real enemy is not Netanyahu but Iran, Hizbullah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad,IS

My beliefs & actions have led to numerous death threats against me; my excommunication by my church

In November 2014, Islamic Relief Worldwide was classified as a terrorist organization by the United Arab Emirates.

Too rarely appreciated for its symbolic weight; it can represent freedom and independence.

Erica Pelman is a spiritually-driven woman. She is founder and director of “In Shifra’s Arms” (ISA), an organization that offers aid to pregnant Jewish women of all religious backgrounds practically, financially and emotionally. Its arms are open to any pregnant woman in need whether single, divorced, separated, or from a financially-strapped family. “Presently, we are […]

Many so-called “humanitarian NGOs” frequently abuse Israel by applying false moral equivalencies

Israeli history now has its version of “Dewey Defeats Truman” with headlines from 2 anti-Bibi papers

In God’s plan why was it necessary that Moses be raised by Pharaoh, away from his own family&people?

In their zechus may we all come to appreciate that life is a fleeting gift and resolve to spend every precious moment of it as if it were the last.

More Articles from Dr. Earl H. Tilford
Tilford-021712

Read the first five books of the Bible and the Book of Joshua. In them, God clearly specified what was expected of Israel: obedience, righteousness and faith being the gist of it. God blessed Israel when it obeyed, and when Israel faltered, God unleashed abundant wrath.

As Israel celebrated its 60th anniversary last month, there were the usual voices raised accusing Israel of victimizing the Palestinian Arabs and “running them out” of the Jewish state.

Most Christians, including many (if not a majority of) members of the mainline Protestant denominations, support Israel. Nevertheless, the Christian Left persists with its sometimes vehemently anti-Israeli and unabashedly pro-Palestinian sentiments. Why?

For a generation after World War II, particularly given revelations of the Holocaust, most American Protestant denominations embraced a more tolerant attitude toward Jews. Since the 1980’s, however, there has been a marked shift, evident in the anti-Israel positions adopted by more liberal denominations like the United Methodist Church (UMC); the Evangelical Presbyterian Church in America (ELCA); the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA); and the Presbyterian Church U.S.A. (PCUSA).

The American left clings to the myth that the antiwar movement ended the U.S. war in Vietnam. In fact, the antiwar movement failed to prompt any substantive changes in U.S. war policy.

According to recent intelligence reports, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) killed 40 Hamas terrorists in Gaza last month without inflicting a single civilian casualty. In fact, over the past five years, collateral damage and civilian casualties caused by Israeli military actions have decreased dramatically. Meanwhile, Hamas continues to fire Kassam rockets indiscriminately at the working-class town of Sderot and into the suburban areas of the nearby seaside city of Ashkelon.

Recently, after I’d given back examinations in one of my classes, one student who received a failing grade laughed, showed the exam to students on each side, and laughed again.

Former Alabama football coach Paul “Bear” Bryant said, “I hate to lose worse than anyone … but if you lose with humility you can come back” a winner.

Back in the early 1970’s I served as an Air Force intelligence officer at Udorn Air Base in Thailand, home of the 432nd Tactical Fighter Reconnaissance Wing. Most of the bombing in 1970 and 1971 focused on Laos, especially the Ho Chi Minh Trail logistical network down which Hanoi funneled troops and supplies onto South Vietnam’s battlefields. Occasionally, the 432nd’s F-4 Phantoms would “go North,” striking targets inside North Vietnam.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/no-substitute-for-victory/2007/11/14/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: