Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.
The world now knows that for nearly 20 years, Senator Barack Obama has attended Chicago’s Trinity United Church and that his pastor was Rev. Jeremiah Wright. In his March 18 speech on race, Obama criticized some of Wright’s statements but also essentially excused and rationalized his sermons on the basis that many African-Americans growing up in past decades experienced prejudice, discrimination, lack of economic opportunity, etc.
“This,” said Obama, “is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African Americans of his generation grew up.”
Half right. African-Americans suffered, many even horrifically, in the past. But Wright was not one of them.
How do I know?
It happens that, as a Philadelphian, I attended Central High School – the same school Jeremiah Wright attended from 1955 to 1959. He could have gone to an integrated neighborhood school, but he chose to go to virtually all-white Central, the second oldest public high school in the country, which attracts the most serious academic students in the city.
The school then was about 80% Jewish (95% white). I attended Central a few years after Wright, so I did not know him personally. But I knew of him and I know where he used to live – in a tree-lined neighborhood of large stone houses in Germantown, a lovely neighborhood to this day. Moreover, Wright’s father was a prominent pastor and his mother a teacher and later vice-principal of the Philadelphia High School for Girls, also a distinguished academic high school.
In short, Wright had a comfortable upper-middle class upbringing. It was hardly the scene of poverty and indignity suggested by Obama to explain what he calls Wright’s anger and what I describe as his hatred.
In recent days, we have seen clips of several of Wright’s sermons showing him declaring “God Damn America,” blaming America for intentionally creating the drug problem, for creating the AIDS virus, for supporting Israeli “state terrorism against Palestinians,” for being responsible for causing 9/11, etc.
We also know that last year Wright’s church presented a lifetime achievement award to Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan. In fact, Wright accompanied Farrakhan in the 1980’s on a visit to Libya, which was then illegal under U.S. law.
Imagine for a moment if a white candidate for high office attended for 20 years a church led by a white supremacist pastor who railed regularly against blacks and accused them of bringing down civilization. Imagine if he honored neo-Nazi David Duke with a major award. Imagine if, when these facts emerged, the candidate said he disagreed with and criticized the pastor’s statements, while also saying he was largely unaware of them.
Imagine that he also tried to rationalize these views by referring to the anger felt by impoverished whites even though the pastor himself actually grew up in comfortable circumstances. Imagine also that his pastor retired amid the praises of his congregants and successor, but that the candidate refused to quit the church while continuing to praise the pastor for his good works helping poor whites. His criticism of the pastor would hardly suffice.
This is the situation Obama now faces. I make no judgment on why he joined and stayed with Wright and his church, though I am deeply concerned that he did so. By quitting the church, Obama would be doing the right thing while reassuring the American public in the process that he will not tolerate hate, divisiveness and anti-Americanism.
About the Author: Morton A. Klein is national president of the Zionist Organization of America.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
It is offensive that in commemorating the Holocaust mentioning Israel was deemed inappropriate.
Shepherding in the Shomron isn’t your usual kind of shepherding – despite his business-minded beginnings, Eli has discovered that a strong ideological impetus powers the job.
His entire existence was about spreading simcha and glorifying G-d’s name on a daily basis.
An Israeli strike could theoretically damage Iran’s nuclear program; only US can terminate program
At some point we need to stop simply defending and promoting Israel and start living in Israel
“We Jews are the only people who when we drop a book on the floor pick it up and kiss it.”
Though Zaide was the publisher of The Jewish Press, a big newspaper,I always remember him learning
Speaker Silver has been an extraordinary public servant since his election to the Assembly in 1975 and has been an exemplary leader of that body since 1994.
He spent the first leg of his daylong visit to the French capital at Hyper Cacher.
Drawing Congress into the Iran nuclear debate is the last thing the White House wants.
Great leaders like Miriam and like Sarah Schenirer possess the capacity to challenge the status quo that confronts them.
Historically, legally, politically, and religiously Israel is the Jewish nation state.
Imagine if the NAACP had responded with skepticism to the passage of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and urged African Americans to exercise their civil rights cautiously under this law. Title VI was landmark legislation when it was passed in 1964 to remedy racial and ethnic discrimination in programs receiving federal funding.
Mahmoud Abbas’s Fatah-controlled Palestinian Authority and Hamas, which controls Gaza, have formally signed a unity agreement.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 requires that colleges and universities redress racial and ethnic discrimination or risk losing their federal funding. Thus, if African American or Hispanic students are harassed on campus, they can complain to the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which is mandated to enforce Title VI and ensure that their schools fix the problem.
Recent polls show that Americans, American Jews and Israelis disapprove of President Obama’s policies toward Israel. They oppose his administration’s condemning Jewish construction in eastern Jerusalem; his UN speech supporting linkage of U.S. support for Israel’s security to Israeli concession to the Palestinians; his comparing Israel’s treatment of Palestinians to the Nazi treatment of Jews in his June 2009 Cairo speech.
Is J Street a pro-Israel group? The lobbying organization never tires of claiming it is.
Yet what pro-Israel group would invite a man to speak at its forthcoming conference who has called for Israel’s destruction, stating that “the establishment by force, violence and terrorism of a Jewish state in Palestine in 1948” was “unjust” and “a crime,” and vowed to “work to overturn the injustice”?
Today, under the Obama administration – as yesterday under the Bush administration – U.S. policy toward the Arab war on Israel is largely based on the notion that Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and his Fatah faction are genuine moderates who reject terrorism and accept Israel’s right to exist, and are therefore committed to building a Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/obamas-pastor-a-product-of-privilege-not-poverty/2008/03/26/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: