web analytics
May 23, 2013 /14 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
The Tosfos Yomtov was convinced that the death of 300,000 –600,000 Jews during the Chmielnicki massacres of 1648-49 were because of improper Tefila. Communicated: Tefilla

Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Prominent American Jews Who Are Ruled by Fear

tell a friend
Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu receives the Levy Report from retired judge Edmond Levy

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu receives the Levy Report from retired judge Edmond Levy
Photo Credit: GPO

http://fresnozionism.org/2012/07/10321/ The Israel Policy Forum (IPF) is a left-of-center group formerly associated with Clinton Administration officials, which apparently slipped into irrelevance with the eclipse of the ‘peace process’, the violence of the Second Intifada, and the Hamas takeover of Gaza.

It’s back, reconstituted under the sponsorship of philanthropist Charles Bronfman, and with some big names in the American (and American-Israeli) world behind it.

But money and names can’t change reality.

No matter how irrational the land-for-peace paradigm proves, no matter how little support there is for it among ordinary Israelis (who will have to deal with the consequences), no matter how vicious the anti-Jewish hatred spewing from PLO media, no matter how many rockets land in southern Israel, no matter how explicit the Palestinian leadership is about its desire to replace Israel with an Arab state, no matter how often the Arabs pocket concessions and immediately escalate demands, no matter how clear it is beyond any reasonable doubt that further concessions at this point will lead to war, not peace — no matter what, some people simply cannot face the brute fact that there is no possibility of peace with the Palestinian Arabs and the larger Arab world in the foreseeable future.

They have convinced themselves that yet another partition of the land of Israel (or ‘Palestine’ — whatever you want to call it) will end the conflict. It won’t. It will only damage Israel’s ability to defend herself while providing a platform for more demands. Soon we will be hearing about “Arab Haifa, Yafo and Acco,” and then perhaps “Tel Arabiyya.”

This is the lesson of recent history. This is what we have learned from what the Arabs say and from what they do. But the ideological commitment to the impossible ‘solution’ seems to override the ability to learn from events.

Here is the letter that 40 well-known (mostly) American Jews have written to Israel’s Prime Minister, under the auspices of the IPF, calling upon him to reject the report of the Levy Commission, which offered a legal opinion that Israeli settlement in Judea and Samaria is legal under international law. I’ll intersperse comments.

As strong advocates for Israel’s security and well-being as a Jewish and democratic state, we are deeply concerned about the recent findings of the government commission led by Supreme Court Jurist (Ret.) Edmund Levy. We fear that if approved, this report will place the two-state solution, and the prestige of Israel as a democratic member of the international community, in peril.

There is no comment about whether the Levy report is correct in its legal judgment or not; only that its adoption will make it harder for Israel to cede land to the Arabs in pursuit of the imaginary ‘solution’, and that it will anger the “international community,” which, by and large, would prefer that there be no sovereign Jewish state.

It’s important to understand that the legitimacy of the Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria derives from the same source — the League of Nations Mandate for Palestine — as does the Jewish presence West of the Green Line. The line is an accidental boundary with no legal significance. Hence if the Government of Israel were to reject the report, then it could be construed as weakening the case for Jewish sovereignty anywhere. This is a far greater ‘peril’ than the loss of the two-state fantasy.

As you boldly stated in your address to the United States Congress last May, “I recognize that in a genuine peace, we’ll be required to give up parts of the ancestral Jewish homeland.” As you said clearly, doing so is not easy. While the Jewish people indeed share a biblical connection to the lands of Judea and Samaria, you told Congress, “there is another truth: The Palestinians share this small land with us. We seek a peace in which they’ll be neither Israel’s subjects nor its citizens. They should enjoy a national life of dignity as a free, viable and independent people living in their own state.”

If Israel does give up part of the “ancestral Jewish homeland” for peace — if somehow this becomes possible, as it clearly is not today — it will be as part of a comprehensive agreement that recognizes that the Jewish people do have a right to a homeland here. Rejecting the report today implies that there is no such right, before there is even a glimmer of hope for an agreement. Insisting that we have a right to this land doesn’t preclude us from agreeing to part with some of it. And if we don’t have the right, why should we keep any of it?

Securing Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state requires diplomatic and political leadership, not legal maneuverings. We recognize and regret that the Palestinian Authority has abdicated leadership by not returning to the negotiating table. Nonetheless, our great fear is that the Levy Report will not strengthen Israel’s position in this conflict, but rather add fuel to those who seek to delegitimize Israel’s right to exist. At this moment, it is more critical than ever that Israel strengthen its claim in the international community that it is committed to a two-state vision, which is, in turn, central to Israel’s future as a Jewish and democratic state.

This paragraph is shocking in its open admission of cowardice and assertion that appeasement is better than standing up for our rights! Never mind if it is actually legitimate for Jews to live in Judea and Samaria, let’s say it’s not — so the Arabs will be empowered to demand that we expel those Jews, in the name of ‘peace’ that they will never permit us to have anyway.

Israel’s right to exist is not determined by its degree of commitment to “a two-state vision,” but rather by its rights under international law and its ability to defend itself against encroachments against those rights. The only thing that can come of surrendering those rights de jure is that we will be forced to give them up de facto as well.

There is also the implication — a sure sign of Oslo Syndrome infection — that if only we make this new concession, the “international community” will finally accept us. Have any of the previous withdrawals or concessions to the Palestinians brought anything other than additional demands or rockets and terrorism?

The “international community” has no problem with the racist exclusionary state that the Arabs plan to set up. Of course Jews will not be able to live in an Arab Palestine! But it is very, very concerned about the rights of Arabs living in Israel. Does this asymmetry tell us anything?

The last sentence suggests that we have no options other than surrendering our rights to Judea and Samaria, or annexing all of it and accepting all of its Arab population as citizens. But this is by no means an exhaustive dichotomy.

Finally, look at the language of the letter: “We fear that if approved…,” “Our great fear is…” [my emphasis added]. How revealing! And how inappropriate for representatives of a Jewish people with a sovereign state.

We are confident that with your deep understanding of the gravity of this situation, and your unprecedented political strength, you will ensure that adoption of this report does not take place.

I wonder.

tell a friend

About the Author: Vic Rosenthal created FresnoZionism.org to provide a forum for publishing and discussing issues about Israel and the Mideast conflict, especially where there is a local connection. Rosenthal believes that America’s interests are best served by supporting the democratic state of Israel, the front line in the struggle between Western civilization and radical Islam. The viewpoint is not intended to be liberal or conservative — just pro-Israel.


You might also be interested in:


3 comments so far

You must log in to post a comment.

3 Responses to “Prominent American Jews Who Are Ruled by Fear”

  1. alanb says:

    It’s very telling that the first comment would come from an anti-Semite like this “Start Loving” character. The anti-Israel crowd is just sitting, ready to pounce…ready to spew anti-Israel/anti-Jewish venom in response to anything…that’s ANYTHING…that’s said or written about an Israeli position no matter what it relates to. The substance of Mr. Rosenthal’s article isn’t even addressed…why should it be?…to the ilk of the anti-Israel crowd, logic, truth, history, decency all mean absolutely nothing.
    Regardless of one’s position on the issue of the settlements, what Mr. Rosenthal says, here, is finally being said, after so long a time of empty hope leading to a disregard for the reality of Israel’s legal position concerning the territories. People like “Start Loving” and those that Mr. Rosenthal refers to in his article will continue to ignore the rockets aimed at civilians…they’ll continue ot disregard the daily demonization of a People…but the truth will remain exactly as Mr. Rosenthal articulately states it to be. Hope that Israel will not abandon what is genuinely Israel’s for no good reason, is not lost because Mr. Rosenthal reminds us all that there is, indeed, a good reason for it.

  2. Guy Peters says:

    the problem is ” disconnected ” ” Jewish ” people ; a ] disconnect from TROAH , TRUTH ; b] disconnect from ISRAEL , c] disconnect from Reality ; I , know too many , far too many , even ” wealty ” Jews” who have No interest in ISRAEL , have been all over the world , yet have never been to ISRAEL , have no interest ; too many ” Jews’ worldwide have no LOVE for TORAH , TRUTH either , frankly , I do not understand why ” they ” even claim to be ” Jewish ” anyway , basically , they are NOT ! One tattooed fellow the other day , for example claiming to be ” Jewish ” had only told me that his name was ” Jewish ” Rosenberg [ ? ] what he meant by that , his only claim to being ” Jewish ” was beyong me ,actually , one of the arquitects of NAZI Germany was a ” Rosenberg” , not ” Jewish ” at all ; as for too many ‘ prominent ” Jewish ” in the U.S.[ and elsewhere ] the better ones are ” disconnected ” while the worst cases are , well , just far worse

  3. there never is going to be peace with islam as islam can’t accept a dhimmi state as a equal.

  4. Start Loving says:

    So, as soon as your writing and position is 'pro Israel,' or 'pro Palestine,' it is propaganda, part of a war effort. Truly, thank you for that clarity and honesty. It isn't that you have anything against the Palestinians. It is that they are not worthy of any consideration at all. The only thing on earth worthy of consideration is Israel and the Israeli Jews. Do you have any idea how dangerous to humanity that makes you? What a plague that makes you? Few people hate cells, organisms, species per se. But when to that species, organism they, the onlooker and potential victim, are nothing more than something to be preyed on, disposed of, exploited, exterminated… well, hate is the psychological mechanism that enables one to set themselves against the threatening entity, be it cancer, Ebola, polio, wolves, Nazis or right-wing nut job Israel-and-Israelis are the only humanoids that matter folks, like you.

    • Chaiya Eitan says:

      It is Assad of Syria who is dangerous to humanity, you fool. You don't even realize what the ramifications of a 'palestinian' state would be for Israel. Go away….

    • Start Loving says:

      My point, well, thank you, you make it again. All that matters is the Israeli state, and the so-called jews. Oh, not the 'real' Jews, you know, the ones placing their bodies between the vile, sub-human Israeli settlers and the Palestinian farmers they are raping and pillaging; or the 'real' Jews like Rabbi Abraham Heschel that treated ALL humans as brothers. No, the fake jews; no one is safe from them because all of us 'others,' you know, NOT God's Chosen, at some point can be seen as in their way, and because all that matters to them is themselves, well, you know how cancer is. It has no animosity to the 'other' cells. They just have zero value, so they get exterminated. There were one of two lessons to be learned by the world, and jews, from the holocaust: 1. Never again to ANYONE; 2. Or the Golda Maier version – NEVER AGAIN TO US, NO MATTER WHAT WE HAVE TO DO TO OTHERS. You know, Hitler's version. You've learned his, well.

  5. Chaiya Eitan says:

    Ooooo. They're scared about what the goyim will think.

  6. Tex Guest says:

    NO DEALS WITH ARABS! GET IT?

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Women and baby at Givat Asaf. A US Embassy officials attended a hearing on a Peace Now petition to story the community
US Implicitly Backs Peace Now Petition to Destroy Outpost
Latest Indepth Stories
Moshe-Feiglin-022213

The importance of the caucus on organ harvesting in China, sponsored recently by the Liberal Lobby in the Knesset, cannot be exaggerated. On the surface, the caucus’s topic seems odd. Knesset members and other VIPs were called together to discuss horrors being perpetrated by the Communist regime in China against what the government there calls “regime opponents.”

Shurin-Dov

My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.

Louis Rene Beres

Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.

It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.

The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”

Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.

The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.

In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.

As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.

To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.

To eat is to live – to keep our physical bodies alive. For without the body, there is nothing. No experience. No memory. No joy and no hardship. But man, unlike animals, eats to live and to enjoy. So how should a Jew respond when he is challenged as to why he imposes upon himself not just ceremonies dedicated to the enjoyment of eating but even more to the limiting of what he can eat?

Neither Secretary of State Kerry nor the president he serves seem to understand Russia’s goals in the Middle East.

You might think that six Khamenei followers might split the hardline vote but don’t worry as that will be taken care of in the ballot-counting if necessary.

More Articles from Vic Rosenthal
Al-Dura

Why didn’t then Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz and then Prime Minister Ehud Barak demand that all the footage shot by France 2 on that day be placed at Israel’s disposal to do a proper investigation?

"The relationship between Islam and the West includes centuries of co-existence and cooperation."

The video story was part of a theme that has run through Obama’s presidency from the beginning.

It seems Russia has decided that the “strong horse” in the Middle East is Iran and the Shiites.

By agreeing with said gangsters that ‘Palestine’ is a state, Google is in effect agreeing that the Jewish people do not have a legitimate state.

In the snake pit of academia, where unfashionable explicit Jew-hatred has morphed into enthusiastic and widespread over-the-top anti-Zionism, Professor Tammi Rossman-Benjamin stands out.

The Chinese proposal gives nothing to Israel except a vague “right to exist” — which of course is in not question regarding any other nation. Indeed, it could have been dictated by Mahmoud Abbas.

Long term trends are mostly in Israel’s favor, although there are serious short-term threats that have to be overcome.

Anyone anyone who talks negatively about Islam is accused of bigotry and hatred on the level of the Ku Klux Klan or the Nazi party.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/prominent-american-jews-who-are-ruled-by-fear/2012/07/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close