web analytics
June 30, 2016 / 24 Sivan, 5776
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

The Legacy of the Leo Frank Travesty

The trial was a shock to American Jews, as was Frank's lynching two years later.

Leo Frank

Leo Frank

Last month – August 25, to be precise – marked the 100th anniversary of conviction of Leo Frank in Atlanta.

The Leo Frank case was not the impetus for the founding of the Anti-Defamation League. While the organization was founded the same year as the arrest and trial of Frank for the murder of one of his factory workers, a 13-year-old girl named Mary Phagan, the idea for ADL, conceived by Sigmund Livingston, a Chicago attorney, preceded the case.

Rather than being the catalyst for the organization, the trial served as a confirmation of the wisdom of Livingston that American Jews needed an institution to combat anti-Semitism.

America was a much different place in 1913. Compared to Europe, Jews here lived far more secure and stable lives, but stereotypes and name-calling were still common.

Still, the trial was a shock to American Jews, as was Frank’s lynching two years later. Looking back, we can see this great tragedy as representing the two sides of America and the Jews that still exist today, but in a very different balance and form.

The lynching of Leo Frank

The lynching of Leo Frank

The Frank affair demonstrated that America was not immune to the stereotypes and conspiracy theories about Jews that had characterized European life for centuries. The blood libel charge was rare in America but a related theme, of a Jewish predator attacking a young Christian female, surfaced in the Frank trial.

For American Jews, the Frank affair was seen as a low point in Jewish life in America. The truth is, however, that the most difficult years came later, particularly in the 1930s when anti-Semitic hate groups proliferated and when quotas in universities and other institutions abounded.

If there were doubts about the need for an ADL, that evaporated among significant parts of the community after Frank’s lynching.

Clearly, America has come a long way in the past 100 years. A Leo Frank incident is unthinkable today. Yet the Frank affair still resonates.

Anti-Semitism in the extreme, a completely biased trial and the lynching, may largely be things of the past. But the stereotypes that underlay that extremism are still alive. ADL surveys show that 15 percent of Americans still have anti-Semitic attitudes.

One hundred years later, we are saddened by the memory that it could have happened here, pleased America has come so far, and recommitted to addressing those still living biases, some of which allowed the travesty that was the Leo Frank affair.

Abraham H. Foxman

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

5 Responses to “The Legacy of the Leo Frank Travesty”

  1. Cody Flecker says:

    Leo Frank for all practical purposes might have been guilty and paid the price for his guilt. he issue is not that he was a Jew or not, but whether he was fooling around

  2. Yechiel Baum says:

    Lynching of jews in the USA is similar to the lynching of Jews in Europe and Arabia. The population of the USA is made up of Europeans and Arabs.
    Ever hear of a Native American Indian doing such a errondous act to a Jew?

  3. Irene Solnik says:

    America was a much different place in 1913. Compared to Europe, Jews here lived far more secure and stable lives, but stereotypes and name-calling were still common.

    stereotypes and name calling exist today. Don't fool yourselves.

  4. Irene Solnik says:

    America was a much different place in 1913. Compared to Europe, Jews here lived far more secure and stable lives, but stereotypes and name-calling were still common.

    stereotypes and name calling exist today. Don't fool yourselves.

  5. Irene Solnik says:

    the man was innocent and that has been proven. Lynching however was not the punishment.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
The terrorist in Netanya.
Two Injured in Netanya Market Stabbing, Terrorist Eliminated [video]

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/the-legacy-of-the-leo-frank-travesty/2013/09/18/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: