web analytics
April 24, 2014 / 24 Nisan, 5774
At a Glance

Posts Tagged ‘Operation Iraqi Freedom’

The Reality Of Iraq

Friday, August 8th, 2003

Despite the growing dismay over the daily attacks against American forces in Iraq, it should by now be quite clear that things could not really be otherwise.

As this page has been opining for years, more frequently since 9/11, there is a Moslem fundamentalist-fueled effort around the globe to confront - and ultimately overcome - Western
civilization through a continuing war of terror. Not able to directly challenge modern military power, resort has been to primitive, relatively inexpensive hit and run strategies, capitalizing on the element of surprise and the ability to arbitrarily choose targets at will. This is not to suggest that there is one central headquarters for terror, but rather that there is a global network that shares intelligence, funding, personnel and training camps with a presence in hotspots around the world.

Thus, American military might made quick work of the Iraqi army and now, the terror network has kicked in, coopting and largely overtaking Saddam Hussein diehards in the current assaults on U.S. personnel. Indeed, U.S. spokesmen are no longer claiming that they do not know whether there is an organized anti-U.S. effort or ragtag opposition in play and are reluctantly conceding the existence of some broader infrastructure. It is inconceivable - and foolhardy to suppose - that the attacks, which have already resulted in half as many American deaths as we suffered in Operation Iraqi Freedom are simply the work of “Iraqi militants.” Indeed, the documented influx of Arab and Islamist “volunteers” into Iraq is only now drawing serious attention.

Hopefully, the Bush Administration will finally learn from Israel’s sad experience with this sort of thing. For years Israel had to labor under the Clinton Administration’s refusal to acknowledge an international dimension to Palestinian terrorists – the Clintonites persisted in referring to them as “militants.” Denying that reality suggested “resistance” and lent a certain legitimacy in some circles to the Palestinian’s murderous thuggery. And it also impeded Israel’s efforts to address terror full-throttle. It was only after President Bush came to accept Israel’s war against Palestinian terror as part of the world-wide war against terror that things started to change, even if America’s new view is not shared by the UN and Europe. It was not for nothing that some Palestinians saw the President’s resolve as an indication that something – if only cosmetically – had to give.

There are many people out there - the French, Russians and Germans come immediately to mind – who are insanely jealous of America’s emergence as the world’s only true superpower and will seek every opportunity to promote efforts to undermine it. Although these nations doubtless hold no brief for Muslim fundamentalism, fundamentalist guerrilla warfare seems tailor-made for them as an antidote to Operation Iraqi Freedom, which they accurately foresaw would confirm American dominance and which they virulently opposed.

In our view, President Bush must take the proverbial bull by the horns and relentlessly pursue those involved in the current wave of attacks against Americans in Iraq both within and outside
Iraq. Not only will this most effectively deal with the threat, but by underscoring an international dimension, the President will be able to counter the European goal of depicting the aftermath of Operation Iraqi Freedom as just “Iraqi resistance” to wrong-headed “American occupation.”

Operation Iraqi Freedom And Weapons Of Mass Destruction

Friday, July 4th, 2003

It seems de rigueur these days to claim that President Bush prevaricated when he took us to war against Iraq. We have yet to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, the ostensible reason for Operation Iraqi Freedom, and they say Mr. Bush had the flimsiest of reason to believe they were there. Most critics, however, conveniently ignore the other asserted reasons such as the mass murders, financing of suicide bombings and the harboring of terrorists – to name three.

In any event, here is what William Safire had to say the other day:

When weighing the murky evidence of an aggressive tyranny’s weapons, President Bush and Prime Minister Blair were obliged to take no chances. The burden of proof was on Saddam. By his contempt, he invited invasion; by its response, the coalition established the credibility of its resolve. There was no “intelligence hoax.”

We agree.

Sandbagging The President

Friday, May 30th, 2003

It would seem that Bismark, Metternich and even Machiavelli have nothing on Britain’s Tony Blair. Having stood firm with President Bush on Operation Iraqi Freedom, it is widely reported that the President feels he “owes him one.” And Blair is skillfully – and ironically – using that chip to ingratiate Britain in the Arab world and reverse the negative reaction engendered by the war against Iraq!

Thus he is trying, very publicly, to “deliver” the United States – and Israel – on the “roadmap” issue. It was not for nothing that Blair was heard to say on several occasions during the war, oddly it appeared at those times, that implementation of the roadmap is just as important as the toppling of Saddam Hussein. If he fails, well, at least he tried. If G-d forbid, he is successful, he, not President Bush gets the credit and Blair gets the best of both worlds. And Mr. Bush and the US stay in the Arab doghouse.

Neat? You bet. Jacques Chirac? Vladimir Putin? Eat your hearts out.

Palestinian “Rope A Dope”?

Friday, May 30th, 2003

In the months prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom, the Bush Administration grappled with the dilemma of determining when enough was enough and military force had to take over where UN inspections left off. In a revealing interview in February, Secretary of State Powell gave us a window into his and the President’s thinking. Here is Secretary Powell’s response to Ted Koppel’s question about how much more time would be appropriate to give Hans Blix and his inspectors:

Just consider what the Iraqi permanent representative [to the United Nations] said after we all have said the declaration they submitted in December was inadequate, it was not full, it was not complete….What was his answer today? “Read it again. It’s all there.” It isn’t all there. The chief inspectors know that. We all know it. And so this is further evidence of Iraq just trying
to rope-a-dope this along, to keep it going until people lose interest and walk away.

We trust that the Secretary will hold to that thought. This is no time to give the Palestinians yet more slack to rebuild their terrorist infrastructure and negate the accomplishments of Israel’s Operation Defensive Shield. Last June, President Bush declared that there can be no progress in Middle East peace efforts until there was “regime change” in the Palestinian Authority. What was needed in order to permit real peace negotiations was a replacement of the existing leadership, which continued to view terror as a legitimate instrument of policy, with those who did not. Abu Mazen’s assuming the post of Palestinian Prime Minister still begs that question, the effusive worldwide huzzahs notwithstanding.

Plainly, Arafat has emerged from the political ashes as the kingmaker. It is clear, perhaps humiliatingly so, that Mazen could never have secured the required approval by the Palestinian
parliament without Arafat’s blessing. Arafat also appears to have retained control over the negotiations with Israel. Over Mazen’s initial objection, he was able to insist on the appointment of his longtime henchman Saeb Erekat as minister in charge of peace negotiations with Israel. The notorious Arafat lieutenant Abed Rabbo was also appointed to the key post of minister for cabinet affairs.

Also referring to Israel’s demand that Mazen’s cabinet should place the war on terrorism at the top of its agenda, his Information Minister designate said, “This is an issue that no Palestinian could accept and it is also irrational.

Given the centrality of the security issue - indeed, Israel’s insistence on the dismantling of Hamas, Islamic Jihad and the Al Aksa Brigade as a precondition for the timelines provided in the so-called “roadmap” to even kick in - and strict adherence to the principle of reciprocity of performance, Amr’s statement is ominous indeed.

For himself, after its vote approving him as Prime Minister, Mazen told the Palestinian parliament that “there is no place for weapons except in the hands of the government. There is only one authority.” This is a promising note, even if he also mouthed most of Arafat’s time-worn political agenda.

In any event, it is important that we have seen this Palestinian movie before and Mazen must demonstrate that he is, in fact, ushering in a new era in Palestinian thinking before he is given the benefit of too much doubt.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/palestinian-rope-a-dope/2003/05/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: