web analytics
August 30, 2014 / 4 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



NYT Upset at Bibi – but They Won’t Say the Real Reason Why

Bibi dared to mention the NY Times' own shoddy record of believing dictators on the threshold of nuclear weapons capability.
ny time oops

The New York Times is not happy with Bibi:

Mr. Netanyahu has legitimate reasons to be wary of any Iranian overtures, as do the United States and the four other major powers involved in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program. But it could be disastrous if Mr. Netanyahu and his supporters in Congress were so blinded by distrust of Iran that they exaggerate the threat, block President Obama from taking advantage of new diplomatic openings and sabotage the best chance to establish a new relationship since the 1979 Iranian revolution sent American-Iranian relations into the deep freeze.

Even though the Times admits that pretty much every fact Netanyahu brought up is accurate!

Mr. Rouhani and the Iranian foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, have insisted repeatedly that Iran wants only to develop nuclear energy and that obtaining a nuclear weapon would harm the country’s security.

Even so, Iran hid its nuclear program from United Nations inspectors for nearly 20 years, and the country is enriching uranium to a level that would make it possible to produce bomb-grade nuclear material more quickly. It has also pursued other activities, like developing high-voltage detonators and building missiles that experts believe could only have nuclear weapons-related uses.

These facts make it hard not to view the upcoming American-brokered negotiations skeptically. But Mr. Netanyahu has hinted so often of taking military action to keep Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon that he seems eager for a fight.

Actually, the main thrust of Bibi’s speech was to not to start a war, but a warning against loosening sanctions in exchange for smiles and empty promises:

I have argued for many years, including on this podium, that the only way to peacefully prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons is to combine tough sanctions with a credible military threat. And that policy is today bearing fruit. Thanks to the effort of many countries, many represented here, and under the leadership of the United States, tough sanctions have taken a big bite out of Iran’s economy. Oil revenues have fallen. The currency has plummeted. Banks are hard pressed to transfer money. So as a result, the regime is under intense pressure from the Iranian people to get the sanctions removed. That’s why Rouhani got elected in the first place. That’s why he launched his charm offensive. He definitely wants to get the sanctions lifted, I guarantee you that, but he doesn’t want to give up Iran’s nuclear weapons program in return.

Now, here’s the strategy to achieve this:

First, smile a lot. Smiling never hurts. Second, pay lip service to peace, democracy and tolerance. Third, offer meaningless concessions in exchange for lifting sanctions. And fourth, and the most important, ensure that Iran retains sufficient nuclear material and sufficient nuclear infrastructure to race to the bomb at a time that it chooses to do so. You know why Rouhani thinks he can get away with this?…Because he’s gotten away with it before. 

The NYT cannot find any holes in Netanyahu’s logic. It cannot find any concrete concession that Rouhani is offering. Yet, against all known facts, it still insists that Rouhani is the moderate who must be given concessions to, and Bibi is the warmonger.

There is nothing wrong with speaking to and negotiating with Iran, but there is a great deal wrong with loosening sanctions in response to a smile.

So if the Times cannot find anything actually wrong with Bibi’s words, why are they so upset at him? The reason seems to be because he called them out for doing the exact same thing with North Korea:

Like Iran, North Korea also said its nuclear program was for peaceful purposes. Like Iran, North Korea also offered meaningless concessions and empty promises in return for sanctions relief. In 2005, North Korea agreed to a deal that was celebrated the world over by many well-meaning people. Here is what the New York Times editorial had to say about it: “For years now, foreign policy insiders have pointed to North Korea as the ultimate nightmare… a closed, hostile and paranoid dictatorship with an aggressive nuclear weapons program.

Very few could envision a successful outcome.

And yet North Korea agreed in principle this week to dismantle its nuclear weapons program, return to the NPT, abide by the treaty’s safeguards and admit international inspectors….Diplomacy, it seems, does work after all.”

A year later, North Korea exploded its first nuclear weapons device.

That’s the real reason the “Paper of Record” is so miffed – because Bibi mentioned its record of believing dictators on the threshold of nuclear weapons capability.

The truth hurts, so the NYT – instead of admitting its very real role in pressuring Washington to believe North Korea’s empty promises – is lashing out at the person who pointed it out.

This is behavior one would expect from a teenager who was caught in a lie, not from a newspaper whose entire reputation is dependent on accuracy.

The NYT’s choosing to ignore that part of Bibi’s speech explains a great deal about its nonsensical editorial that is at odds with facts.

Visit Elder of Ziyon.

About the Author: Elder blogs at http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.il/


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

13 Responses to “NYT Upset at Bibi – but They Won’t Say the Real Reason Why”

  1. Iran-lovers must ask themselves this question: What is the purpose of the Shahab-3? It is not accurate enough to deliver a conventional payload to a specific miltary target. It is an "area weapon", suitable only for delivering WMD, and its range now includes Israel. To me, that is all one needs to know about Iran's peaceful intentions.

  2. Of course, the ShariaState’s representatives – let it be a ”hawk-like” mullah or more of a “dove-like” – are not to be trusted. A fascist is a fascist, and there are loads of evidence of their ill-intentioned wish. Alone their vocabulary is ripe with Nazi-like evil: Overdrive language with hints to genocide of the Jewish People. Their most wet dreams are about to get a nuclear bomb so as to wipe out Israel. One of the Mullahs – or was it the Amadmanonajihad himself – uttered that it is convenient that Israel exists, then all of the Jews can be annihilated once and for all – at one spot. – That kind of vitriol vocabulary did not die with The Third Reich.
    The Islamists don’t hate Jews because of Israel – they hate Israel because of Jews.

  3. the nytimes is an ugly anti-semitic rag with no credibility and is the grey lady in name only. pundits skitter across the pages with no trace of journalism unless it is from their moslem make believe "reporters".

  4. jgray1 says:

    these are the same jew haters who were having hitler to tea and allowing his nazi minions to march in nyc while nazi “youth” camps were flourishing on long island. the hell wit h all of them. Israel prevails when it bakes its own bread.

  5. Arie Arazi says:

    You are right on. Only I wish that your comments would reach the millions American Jews who would rather read and believe the NYT than the Torah.

  6. Anonymous says:

    It is time to lift the sanctions to Iran, the people are paying for that and increase the hatred to US, EU, Russia, China, Israel, Netanyahu has to shut up, he lost the "momentum" to strike to Iran after the second term election from Amadmanonajihad when the people tryed to tople the ayatollahs goverment.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Correction: No Amadmanonajihad, it is Ahmadinejad

  8. The New York Slimes, as Marc Steyn calls it, would not be allowed to come over the threshhold of our home. What a shame this is looked to as "the paper of record." Their "record" of unabashed liberalism on all their pages is a disgrace!

  9. vonryansexpress says:

    TeachESL Thank you—For the NYT, Netanyahu is a PM who must be undermined at each page turn–even if it means eyewashing for Qom.

  10. Netanyahu's speech was about reality and truth. He was in the role of statesman rather than politician. Words from the heart that not everyone wants to hear.

  11. benakiva37 says:

    To Frankelprocesstech:People always “pay” for the bigotry and viciousness of their government,but  Israel has the option to strike the Iranian mullahs for their repeated and continuing promises to destroy the Jewish State.The strike if it does occur must be nuclear-based and must remove the research,development,production and launch facilities for the Iranian government, as well as the conventional Iranian strike forces.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
ISIS in Quneitra
Updates from Kuneitra, Syria [video]
Latest Blogs Stories
The Palestinian Authority backed by EU funds, has sent Bedouin into the E-1 area of Maaleh Adumim to claim it is part of their fictional history.

The new “Begin Plan” is an impending nightmare, it rewards the Bedouins for brazen land-grabbing.

its a deal

There is absolutely nothing for Israel’s security in this American document.

A Jewish wedding.

Is it because of corrupt values and lack of meeting opportunities that we have a shidduch crisis?

Islamic Law

Israel is fighting the war that none of the Western world has the ability or courage to fight.

Finish the job! Sayyem et a missima!סיים את המסימה!

Life after 50? You better believe it! Tips on how to prepare and enjoy life after retirement.

While I am no fan of the two-state solution, I think I have a solution for the Gaza strip. Let me make it perfectly clear that in no way do I believe a Palestinian people, nation or Arab State ever existed in the history of the world and certainly was not occupied by Israel. If […]

Hamas targeted the Erez Crossing when it knew that Gazans and Israeli Arabs would be there, out in the open…

Does it really take Jewish innovation to come up with this idea?

If you don’t know who’s behind The terror in your mind The answer’s not hard to find, Blame the Jews

If feminism is mentioned at all, it is usually to condemn it as an anti Torah ideal.

“…people making jokes about turning this into a shelter rave, taking #bombshelterselfies…”

Marriage is not just about emotional fidelity but about financial fidelity as well.

So you want to blame Israel? First answer these 5 simple questions, and see if you even have a leg to stand on…

Hamas’s online Jihadi supporters and groupies are desperately trying to differentiate between their support for Hamas and supporting ISIS.

We all got degrees. We got married. We had families. We worked. We and were Koveih Itim

More Articles from Elder of Ziyon
Primer.jpg

Beware of the “creative license” reporters and spokespeople take to claim maximal harm to Gazans by Israel.

A tourist walks past a Christian souvenir shop with pictures of Pope Francis near Manger Square, on May 21, 2014.

Pope asked to dine with poor families, but church leaders instead use locals as props to slam Israel!

Elder of Ziyon shows that Abbas is cynically using the Holocaust as a way to say that Jews are doing to Palestinian Arabs the same “injustice”  and “oppression” that Jews suffered under Nazis.

Visa has ads in an Egyptian magazine in which a story describes Jews as vampires. And worse.

A Hillel student spoke against the anti-Israel resolution, but also called Israeli actions “shameful.”

The report is titled: “Trigger-happy: Israel’s use of excessive force in the West Bank.” Need we say more?

Saeb Erekat is, once again, lying. Just as we caught him lying many, many times before.

SodaStream supports Palestinian Arab families every single day, a lot more than any leftist NGO.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/elder-of-ziyon/nyt-upset-at-bibi-but-they-wont-say-the-real-reason-why/2013/10/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: