web analytics
January 27, 2015 / 7 Shevat, 5775
 
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


A Red-Faced Red Cross

The head of the International Committee of the Red Cross delegation in Israel does not understand that we are Jews returning, not being transferred.
redcross tac toe

Photo Credit: YY

There is an oped in Haaretz (where else?) by the head of the ICRC delegation in Israel arguing that

…contrary to what is claimed in the Levy report, it is manifestly clear that the West Bank is occupied by Israel…Furthermore, concerning the settlements in the West Bank, it has to be emphasized that Article 49 (6 ) of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits a state from transferring parts of its own civilian population to territory it occupies, does not merely prohibit the occupying state from forcefully transferring parts of its population; it also prohibits any action by the occupier which facilitates such transfer.  The ICRC commentary on the Fourth Geneva Convention makes clear that Article 49 (6 ), like the convention as a whole, aims to protect the local population in the occupied territory and not the population of the occupying state. Furthermore, international humanitarian law prohibits any action by an occupying power aimed at altering the intrinsic characteristics of the occupied territory, including any measures that affect its demographic, cultural or social composition.

My comment left there:

This is a stupid article.  Of course a territory can be occupied, but legally or illegally is the question.  I am at the present occupying the chair I am seated in.  So what?  What Schaerer is trying to prove, that Israel is engaged in “illegality”, is a flop.  Without referring to the history of the claims to sovereignty, one would never know that what happened in 1939, i.e., the illegal move by Gt. Britian to alter the terms of the Mandate by the League of Nations, followed by the Arab rejection of Partition, to the annexation of Judea & Samaria by Jordan, the ongoing terror since 1947 and the threat of war in 1967, which all lead to a legal justification for Israel to occupy Judea and Samaria, to facilitated “close Jewish settlement” therein, including the use of “state and waste lands”.  There is no crime of “settlement” involved and the defensive war Israel was required to wage gives Israel all rights to be in the area.  The throw-in of “transferring” is ridiculous as Jews lived in the areas of Judea, Samaria and Gaza for centuries prior to 1947-49 and it was only because of a policy of ethnic cleansing practiced by Arabs during the Mandate and the War of Independence – Schaerer knows of those illegal  acts, does he not? – that Jews were not there in 1967.

We Jews are returning, not transferring oursleves or being transferred.

I think the Red Cross should be red-faced after this travesty of law and history.

Visit My Right Word.

About the Author: Yisrael Medad resides in Shiloh and is a foreign media spokesperson for the Yesha Council of Jewish Communities.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

7 Responses to “A Red-Faced Red Cross”

  1. thanks for spreading the word.

  2. Jeremy Eliot says:

    There was no border between Israel and Jordan in 1967! It was a cease-fire line!
    It is therefore totally wrong to refer to the West Bank as "Occupied". The cease fire line, moved… Israeli Citizens have every human right to live there in peace.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Hassnain Aliamin , one of four Muslim teenagers who attacked a Jew in Gateshead.
‘Let’s Go Jew-Bashing’ Muslims Hauled into British Court
Latest Blogs Stories
Auschwitz Entrance

How do we make sure the Holocaust is relevant to new generations?

Brutal evacuation of Amona

In 2006, Amona kids saw their teachers and rabbis being thrown from windows as if they were garbage

Photo posted on Fatah Facebook page, removed Jan.3, 2015.

No money should go to terrorists or their families; anyone involved in terror must pay the price

kiruv-shafran

Responsible Jewish outreach encourages BTs to retain and to enhance their relationship with parents

Israelis will vote for Likud because of Caroline Glick, but she’ll just be Right window dressing.

What are the dynamics of running a family business and what are its impact on family relationships?

The Hareidi paper HaMevaser wanted to have their cake and eat it too: use the photo; lose the women

Producer Chuck Wang explains how you can learn from mistakes and move on towards success.

Chareidi women who want to run for political office don’t suit the full definition of “chareidi.”

France inviting Abbas to the “anti-terror rally” makes me doubt it takes Muslim terrorism seriously

How could a Jewish family hide on the 3rd floor of a hotel where the Germans were on the 1st floor?

No Charedi leader has suggested a change that would make a difference to a failing paradigm

What is the “rookie mindset” and what can new trainees offer to the workplace?

And now for MORE Muslim musings-Go Ask Ayman-

This terror won’t respond to reason or logic. It must be hunted down. Destroyed. No trial/No talking

Israel as the Jewish State insures freedom of worship and security of Jews here and around the world

More Articles from Yisrael Medad
US State Department spokesperson Jen Psaki.

The answers could make you “puke.”

State Dept. Spokesperson Jen Psaki (R) with Secretary of State John Kerry. Psaki revealed Kerry himself has no trust in the promise of regional acceptance he's been lavishing on Israel.

MS. PSAKI: He asked me if we thought he (molotov-cocktail throwing Arab-US citizen was a terrorist, and I said no.

Is the EU “Jewish challenged”?

There was a problem: A different speech, in part, was delivered on September 27

” the Americans mistakenly led Israel to believe that Hamas accepted an unconditional 72-hour cease-fire “

If anyone can claim that what Prof. Shindler asserted and what Netanyahu said are similar, I guess there is something wrong with their reading glasses.

The U.S. recognizes the “West Bank” as having “sovereignty” for passport purposes, but not Israel?

Polls relied on to “prove” Palestinian Arabs want peaceful solution were anomalous and incomplete.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/my-right-word/a-red-faced-red-cross/2012/11/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: