web analytics
November 30, 2015 / 18 Kislev, 5776
At a Glance
Sponsored Post

Culture War Ruining Journalism, Academia, and Charity

This was the mainstream of democracy and democratic opinion: The "vital center."
George Orwell was an anti-radical, anti-totalitarian socialist who admired the United States.

George Orwell was an anti-radical, anti-totalitarian socialist who admired the United States.

Originally published at Rubin Reports.

“He who tells the truth is driven from nine villages.” – Turkish Proverb

A couple of decades ago, I was invited to a conference on the anniversary of the birth of Isaiah Berlin. One of the speakers was the George Orwell professor of a British university.

But his ideas were the opposite of Orwell’s. Orwell was a great patriot. On the contrary, this guy’s definition of a nation was any random lines drawn on a map–no preconditions. He was no patriot. I guess a nation having values is invalid now.

Also, Orwell was an anti-radical socialist, author of the amazing anti-radical Animal-Farm, and a milder, anti-totalitarian socialist who admired the United States. In contrast, the endowed professor had the opposite ideas and real politics of Orwell.  After I challenged him on these modern “Progressive” (leftist) points, nobody spoke to me for the rest of the conference, because they just assumed what he said was true.

If you want to know a contemporary story about this, I can refer to an experience at a conference where a professor (George Orwell professor in fact, was a great patriot, though a socialist) made jokes.

But then I thought about Berlin himself. He championed values of pluralism and individual liberty, against political correctness and enforced orthodoxy.

There are two issues at stake. First, the moderate liberal-conservative democratic consensus–Orwell and Berlin–staked out these margins. This was the mainstream of democracy and democratic opinion: The “vital center.” Today, this has been rejected in place of bitter, triumphalist partisanship, a transformation of the system.

Second, scholarship and honest journalism: Go where truth ordains, even if it is not your preference. This is in place of the indoctrination and partisanship, which have turned large tracts of entertainment, journalism, and scholarship into lies.

In other words, people want teaching, journalism, and charity to be credible. But these are caught-up in the partisan culture war- which is in control of the left. The coinage of these matters is debased.

About the Author: Professor Barry Rubin is director of the Global Research in International Affairs (GLORIA) Center and editor of the Middle East Review of International Affairs (MERIA) Journal. See the GLORIA/MERIA site at www.gloria-center.org.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Culture War Ruining Journalism, Academia, and Charity”

  1. Ruth Hirt says:

    Journalists, academicians and social piety should not cower and be subservient to the caprice of culture sentiments. Culture here should find limits where it can be legally appropriated, in its own geographic domain. Could it be there will emerge a pluralized treatment of media regardless of territory free from deterrents ? It seems should there be, it is superficial. I need a lot more to realize … what with all the pretenses …

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Palestinians: The Real Goal of the Intifada

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/analysis/rubin-reports/culture-war-ruining-journalism-academia-and-charity/2013/12/04/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: