Join Meir Panim’s campaign to “light up” Chanukah for families in need.
Last week, The New York Times startled even those of us who have come to expect its Mideast reporting and editorializing to be driven by bias toward the Palestinian take on events.
Not even the persistent equating of the initiators of violence with the retaliators; of the perpetrators with the victims; or of tragic accident with purposeful murder was adequate preparation for a Times ?correction? of a recent news report covering the story of the murders of three Israelis. In this abject attempt to further bow to political correctness, the Times made an embarrassing stumble.
In its Wednesday, May 30 issue, in a story headlined ?Six Killed In Renewed Mideast Violence,? the Times reported that ?Three Israeli settlers and three Palestinians were killed today in fresh violence in the West Bank and Gaza Strip….? The story went on to identify one of the victims as Gilad Zar, and report that he was killed by gunfire as he drove near Nablus.
We are then told the following about the other two victims:
A few hours later, near Bethlehem, gunmen firing from a passing car killed two women from the settlement of Efrat as they drove to Jerusalem. They were identified as Sarah Blaustein, 53, and Esther Alvan, 20.
Mrs. Blaustein, an America, moved to Israel with her husband last summer from Lawrence, N.Y….
In its Tuesday, June 5 edition, the Times ran the following item in its ever-growing ?Corrections? section:
An article on Wednesday about continuing violence in the Middle East and the shooting death of a settler, Sarah Blaustein, misstated her destination when she moved from the United States last August. It was the settlement of Efrat, which is in the West Bank, not in Israel (italics ours).
One wonders what it is that motivates the folks at the Times to engage ? after a week ? in such an exercise in formalism concerning one inconspicuous, passing line in an account of what was, after all, horrific premeditated murder.
Indeed, the blip escaped the author of the piece, Joel Greenberg, someone who rigorously adheres to the company line on the Middle East. The story was otherwise unerringly faithful to the Times?s distinction between ?Israel? and ?the settlements.? The reference even eluded Times editors and apparently, for a time, the Political Correctness police.
But what is most intriguing is that the ?Correction? leaves a gaping hole in Greenberg?s story. If Mrs. Blaustein?s destination when she moved from America was not Israel, but the West Bank, exactly what made her an ?Israeli settler? as The Times described her? Perhaps it is time for a refresher course in the PC department over at The Times.
This episode has created a stir over the Internet, with many calling for a boycott of the Times. Plainly, the paper has to get the message that this sort of thing has to stop. The thinking of hundreds of thousands of people is being informed by the Times?s agenda-driven presentation.
It was bad enough when it was just the Editorials and the Op Ed columns that caused a reader to to put up his or her guard. Then the bias began creeping into the news reporting. Now even the ?Correction? section has been mobilized.
More Selective Reporting From
The Paper Of Record
Thousands of Palestinians danced in the streets of Gaza, Ramallah and other Palestinian controlled towns and cities in celebration of the suicide bombing of innocent civilians in Hadera; this never made it into the news pages of The New York Times.
A poll recently reported the stunning news that fully 71% of Palestinians support continued suicide bombings against Israelis; this too failed to draw the attention of the paper of record.
But when Israelis retaliated against the stoning of an Israeli infant, and rallied in front of Prime Minister Sharon?s residence to urge the targeting of Palestinian officials and other measures, even war, to stop the organized terror, William A. Orme, Jr., in a Times story last Thursday entitled ?Settlers Press Sharon to Declare War on the Palestinians,? had this to say:
Furious Jewish settlers fought Palestinians this afternoon near a West Bank crossroads where an Israeli infant was wounded by Arab stone-throwers on Tuesday, and then gathered here this evening to demand a declaration of war against the Palestinian Authority.
At a rally in Zion Square [in Jerusalem], thousands of settlers called for the death of the Palestinian leader, Yasir Arafat, and condemned Prime Minister Ariel Sharon for not retaliating immediately after Friday?s bombing at a beachfront nightclub in Tel Aviv, which has now claimed 21 lives.
Apparently, the deep-rooted and rampant anti-Israel viciousness of the Palestinians is not something the Times thinks newsworthy enough to be shared with its readers. But a spin on self-defense as extremist war-mongering apparently is.
About the Author:
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Comments are closed.
Desperate people take what they can, seizing opportunity to advance their main goal; the Arabs don’t
There was a glaring void in the President’s State of the Union speech: Israel.
Let’s focus not on becoming an ATM for that little bundle of joy, but on what you can save in taxes.
Israel has some wild places left; places to reflect and think, to get lost, to try to find ourselves
The British government assured Anglo-Jewry that it is attacking the rising levels of anti-Semitism.
Obama’s Syrian policy failures created the current situation in the Golan Heights.
Our journey begins by attempting to see things differently, only then can we be open to change.
Despite Western ‘Conventional Wisdom&PC,’ the Arab/Israeli conflict was never about the Palestinians
Confrontation & accountability, proven techniques, might also help dealing with religious terrorists
In fact, wherever you see soldiers in Paris today, you pretty much know you’re near Jewish site
Inspired by the Perek Shira pasuk for “small non-kosher animals” we named the bunny “Rebbetzin Tova”
The abuse following publication proved a cautionary tale: no one followed in Peters’s footsteps
Plainly, there is no guiding hand dictating choices across the board.
In this particular case, the issue was whether the Arkansas prison system could prohibit, for security reasons, a devout Muslim’s maintaining a beard of a certain length as a matter of religious practice.
Despite the president’s respectable anti-terrorism record, he doubtless has little interest in being identified with anything that might suggest, however tangentially, criticism of Muslims or Islam.
One wonders what connection that rejection has with turning to the ICC, which would allow the Palestinians to bring war-crime charges against individual Israelis and is certainly one more step away from seeking a negotiated settlement.
In the NPR interview, Mr. Obama said Iran could become a “very successful regional power” if it agreed to a long-term nuclear deal.
Thus, despite the increasingly serious problems for the mayor arising out of the current anti-police protests, Mr. de Blasio apparently will be cut no slack by those who seem to be aiming for a significant role in running the city from the streets and who will do whatever they can to prevent their momentum from ebbing.
Despite strong pressure to throw the book at the accused, Mr. Thompson allowed him to plead guilty to assault.
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/editorial/new-low-for-the-times/2001/07/13/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: