web analytics
May 20, 2013 /11 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
jumping Following a Passion for Sports to Israel

In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.



That Old-Time Clintonian ‘Engagement’


tell a friend
Media-Monitor-logo

Media coverage of the fighting between Israel and Hizbullah has gone largely as expected – CNN, The New York Times and other liberal outlets see events largely through a prism of Lebanese civilian casualties, while Fox News, the New York Sun and other conservative organs present a broader picture of Hizbullah provocations and the suffering of civilians on both sides.

The Monitor will single out some journalists and pundits for comment in next week’s column. This week, with much of the liberal media – and just about every elected Democrat not from New York – engaged in full-throated pleading for a return to the “engagement” and endless negotiations that marked the Clinton years, it seemed like a good time to reflect for a moment or two on the Golden Age of Clintonian Moral Equivalence in U.S. foreign policy.

“If you think that what’s going on in the Middle East today would be going on if the Democrats were in control,” said Democratic National Chairman Howard Dean, “it wouldn’t….We would have had the moral authority that Bill Clinton had when he brought together…the Israelis and the Palestinians.”

Leaving aside the question of how anyone in his right mind (well, we are talking about Howard Dean, after all) could include the words “moral authority” and “Bill Clinton” in the same sentence, what, exactly, did Clinton accomplish with his much vaunted bringing together of Israelis and Palestinians? Was there peace – or anything remotely approaching it – when Clinton left office?

The “engagement” that liberals and media types remember with such fondness and castigate President Bush for turning his back on did nothing but embolden Yasir Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

It was “engagement” that led U.S. officials to ignore Arafat’s repeated assurances to his followers that Oslo was but a ruse to weaken Israel; and President Clinton to interfere on behalf of the Labor party in not one, but two Israeli elections, dispatching his political strategists to help Shimon Peres in 1996 and Ehud Barak in 1999; and the White House to extend to Arafat treatment usually accorded heads of legitimate countries.

Does anyone really wish to bring back the bad old days of Secretary of State Madeleine Albright desperately chasing after a recalcitrant Arafat in a Paris chateau? Remember the embarrassing incident? It was the first week of October 2000, a few days after the outbreak of the second Palestinian intifada, and Albright, Barak and Arafat were close to hammering out an agreement to end the fighting. Arafat suddenly stormed out of the meeting and Albright actually ran after him, imploring him to please come back while shouting out for someone, anyone, to shut the gates before her elusive prey could get away.

Do we really need to relive Bill Clinton’s shameful 1998 trip to Gaza? It was there, as Yossef Bodansky writes in The High Cost of Peace: How Washington’s Middle East Policy Left America Vulnerable to Terrorism, that “Clinton’s true sense of the dynamics of the Middle East was revealed when he publicly equated Palestinian terrorists and Israeli victims of terrorism.”

For those with short memories, here’s what the “fully engaged” Clinton said to a group of Palestinian VIPs:

“I’ve had two profoundly emotional experiences in the last less than 24 hours. I was with Chairman Arafat, and four little children came to see me whose fathers are in Israeli prisons. Last night, I met some little children whose fathers had been killed in conflict with Palestinians, at the dinner that Prime Minister Netanyahu held for me. Those children brought tears to my eyes. We have to find a way for both sets of children to get their lives back and to go forward….If I had met them in reverse order I would not have known which ones were Israeli and which Palestinian. If they had all been lined up in a row and I had seen their tears, I could not tell whose father was dead and whose father was in prison, or what the story of their lives were, making up the grief that they bore.”

tell a friend

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Arafat and the Temple Mount: His successor, Mahmoud Abbas, undermines a planned UNESO visit to the Temple Mount site
PA Outsmarts Self, Loses Out on UNESCO Old City Mission
Latest Indepth Stories
The Gospel according to the Palestinian Authority

How far the PA will go to present the lie as the truth and the truth as a lie? Its claim that Jesus was a Palestinian is old hat. But now the “resurrection” also refers to “the Palestinian state.”

Dreamland bully

The progressive consolidation imagines that organization can contain the messier side of man.

Russian Yakhont missile

The Russian Yakhont missiles already delivered to Syria threaten Israel Navy ships carrying out vital missions in the Mediterranean.

Eid al-Adha celebrated in Moscow

Islamism represents the transformation of Islamic faith into a political ideology.

America could be said to be building a united front against Iran, but at what price?

The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.

Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.

Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.

The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.

Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.

The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.

We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”

Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.

Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.

Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Front-Page-040513

I was shamed into becoming a baseball fan by my mother, a Holocaust survivor who came to America in 1953 and who to this day doesn’t know the difference between a home run and a strikeout.

Michael Kelly

The late Michael Kelly was a brilliant writer and editor (The New York Times, Washington Post, The New Republic, The Atlantic) who coincidentally happened to be an American patriot and a strong supporter of Israel – a combination not commonly found in the circles in which he traveled.

Even as he left office in January 2002 on a note of unprecedented triumph and popularity, the tone of the New York Times’s editorials and most of its news coverage was startlingly jaundiced.

Koch became a chronic – some would say compulsive – critic of Giuliani.

Resnick has collected five dozen of his best interviews in book format. Called “Movers and Shakers: Sixty Prominent Personalities Speak Their Mind on Tape” (Brenn Books), the collection includes updates on nearly every interviewee plus several questions that never appeared in The Jewish Press.

Al Gore has been in the news again, and even some of his biggest admirers are upset with Gore’s decision to sell his Current TV cable network to Al Jazeera, which is owned by the oil-rich Islamic monarchy of Qatar, for $500 million.

Ehud Barak may or may not be out of Israeli politics for good, but his recent resignation announcement reminded the Monitor of just how much the man had been willing to give up to Yasir Arafat at the tail end of Bill Clinton’s presidency.

Roughly 30 percent of those Jews who had voted for Reagan in 1980 went for Mondale in 1984.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/media-monitor/that-old-time-clintonian-engagement/2006/07/26/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close