Chillul Tefila Bifarhesia, as well as halachicly challenged verbiage and dress, are external manifestations of a critical lack of personal yiras shomayim which has lethal consequences.
Commemorating a national tragedy requires integrity. Memorial Day is not observed with proclamations of pacifism, nor should it be. December 7, 1941, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, is properly remembered as the day that will “live in infamy,” not as a plea for international sensitivity.
As Americans prepared to remember the loss of nearly 3,000 innocent lives in the most horrific attack in our history, our measure of fidelity to the meaning of 9/11 was tested. There was, understandably, a wide array of commemorative responses. Amid the profusion of agonizing replays, poignant reminiscences and solemn reflections, one response was conspicuous for its willful distortion of history.
As it happened, it came from the White House in the form of guidelines to government officials. Released to The New York Times (and curiously unavailable on any government website), it provided a dismaying glimpse of memory transformed by a political agenda.
“A chief goal of our communications,” declared the guidelines, “is to present a positive, forward-looking narrative.” No space would be wasted with reminders of the war that had been declared by jihadi Muslims, inspired by Osama bin Laden, against the United States as the ultimate embodiment of evil.
Indeed, as one government official explained, “The important theme is to show the world how much we realize that 9/11 – the attacks themselves and violent extremism writ large – is not just about us.” Precisely why a targeted attack against the United States was not “just about us” was left to the imagination.
Contriving a multicultural event, the White House proclaimed: “We honor and celebrate the resilience of individuals, families, and communities on every continent, whether in New York or Nairobi, Bali or Belfast, Mumbai or Manila, or Lahore or London.” This alliterative recitation was clearly designed to deflect attention from the nation that was exclusively targeted on 9/11.
It also conspicuously omitted two cities in one country that has been the target of choice for Muslim terrorists for decades. That country, of course, is Israel, where Palestinian terrorists carried out deadly massacres in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv long before, and ever since, 9/11. In the past decade alone, more than 1,000 Israelis were murdered in targeted terrorist attacks, while more than 8,000 rockets have been launched into Israel by Hamas and Hizbullah. Why the White House chose to ignore Jewish victims of Muslim terrorism in the Jewish state, targeted solely because they were Jews, deserves an explanation – and an apology.
In a revealing display of wishful thinking, the White House guidelines instructed American officials abroad to emphasize that “Al Qaeda and its adherents have become increasingly irrelevant.” It all depends, of course, on what the meaning of “adherents” is. Certainly Hamas and Hizbullah, funded and armed by Iran and Syria, have not disappeared.
As New York Times culture critic Edward Rothstein noted in his scathing commentary (September 3) on the White House guidelines, they contained no hint that 9/11 was “about Islamist extremism or the jihadist proclamations by its aspirants.” They also carefully avoided mentioning that American military power has had anything to do with crippling Al Qaeda or obliterating Osama bin Laden and other top leaders.
According to the guidelines, the tenth-year anniversary was to be a national day of “Service and Remembrance.” Commemoration should encourage “service projects” and a “spirit of unity” to strengthen the nation whenever it is called upon to confront “whatever dangers may come – be they terrorist attacks or natural disasters.” Somehow 9/11 and Hurricane Irene became moral equivalents.
What the White House guidelines, and the president who authorized them, ignored is the horrifying uniqueness of 9/11: Muslim terrorists declared war against the United States by flying airplanes filled with innocent travelers into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and (due to the uncommon bravery of passengers on Flight 93) the ground at Shanksville rather than the Capitol.
Perhaps the more urgent conclusion to be drawn from 9/11, missing from the commemoration guidelines, is that appeasement of terrorism is misguided. There was, after all, a history of pre-9/11 terrorism directed against American targets. In 1998, 257 people were killed by Islamic terrorists who blew up American embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Two years later an Al Qaeda attack killed 17 American sailors aboard the USS Cole.
But the response of the Clinton administration was muted. And the incessant bureaucratic infighting and ineptitude in the CIA and FBI, and between them, left the nation woefully unprepared for what was coming as bin Laden grew ever more emboldened.
In his Cairo speech in 2009, and since, President Obama has defended Islam as a religion of peace while soft-pedaling Muslim extremism and avoiding its continuing targeting of Israel. According to his director of national intelligence, after all, the Muslim Brotherhood “is largely secular, eschewing violence.” The president’s counter-terrorism adviser claimed “there is no Jihadist terrorism, because Jihad is a process which purifies the soul.” His homeland security secretary avoided mention of terrorism by substituting the ludicrous “man-caused disaster.”
An unprecedented national tragedy cannot be understood, nor future danger averted, by wishful thinking, euphemism, and denial. But the revisionists are already hard at work to do just that.
The integrity of commemoration, as most Americans surely realized, required truth-telling. But the White House 9/11 guidelines lamentably demonstrated that a president known for “leading from behind,” except when Israel is available for pummeling, may not yet realize that while 9/11 is now a decade in the past, the dangers to Americans – to say nothing of Israelis – from Muslim terrorism remain front and center on any jihadi target list.
Jerold S. Auerbach is the author of “Brothers at War: Israel and the Tragedy of the Altalena” (Quid Pro Books), published in June.
About the Author:
You must log in to post a comment.
France 2 and Enderlin must have their press accreditation revoked and be thrown out of Israel.
Slaughter is a routine, widespread practice among many Moslem families.
parently an affront to J Street’s worldview, the focus of which appears to be the creation of a Palestinian State, whether or not that will bring peace.
My mother, the eldest daughter of Reb Yaakov Kamenetsky, zt”l, was niftar last month at the age of 92. She took her last breath in her home in Efrat, Israel, next door to the shul that was my father’s for 24 years before his passing in 2007.
It comes down to his being famous.
Following the Boston Marathon bombing, one crucial point will likely remain overlooked. The most loathsome aspect of this or any other terror bombing attack on civilians will always lie in the inexpressibility of physical pain. While all decent people will abhor the idea of bombs expressly directed at the innocent, whether here or in other countries, none will ever be able to process the very deepest horrors of what has been inflicted.
It’s only natural to see increasing evidence of Jerusalem’s glorious Jewish past being unearthed, quite literally, under modern Israeli sovereignty. The new archaeological finds are also very timely – as the Arab onslaught attempting to detach Jerusalem from its Jewish roots gains steam, the facts on the ground, or “under” the ground, show quite otherwise.
The Talmud (Berachot 26b) says, “tefillot avot tiknum” – “prayer was established by the avot.” The Talmud then uses the following verse (Bereshit 19:27) to prove how Avraham established prayer: “Vayaskem Avraham baboker el hamakom asher amad sham et pnei Hashem” – “And Avraham got up early in the morning to the place where he had stood before God.”
Nearly 13 years ago, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak journeyed to Camp David to end the conflict with the Palestinians. With the approval of President Clinton, he offered Yasir Arafat an independent Palestinian state in almost all of the West Bank, Gaza and in part of Jerusalem. Arafat said no.
The news that the Internal Revenue Service unfairly targeted conservative groups has brought renewed spotlight on a 2010 lawsuit filed by the pro-Israel group Z Street, which alleges it was also singled out by the IRS when applying for tax-exempt status.
In an editorial last week (“Circling the Wagons”) we noted the efforts by the administration and its supporters to dismiss allegations that the government’s spin on the Benghazi attack was designed to shield the president and that the IRS was improperly used to stifle opposition to Mr. Obama’s reelection.
As the controversies besetting the Obama administration continue to grow in number and intensity, the prospect that President Obama would seriously consider military action against Iran, should that country continue its drive to become a nuclear power, becomes more and more remote. So we welcome the current enhancement of sanctions against Iran on the federal and New York State levels.
To his parents’ friends, he was “Mrs. Greenberg’s disgrace,” but to sports fans he is one of the greatest – if not the greatest – Jewish baseball players of all time. Long before Sandy Koufax, Hank Greenberg excited Jewish sports fans with his prowess on the baseball diamond.
One of my searing early memories from Israel is a visit nearly four decades ago to the Ghetto Fighters Museum in the Beit Lohamei Hagetaot kibbutz. The world’s first Holocaust museum, it was built soon after the Independence War by survivors of the Warsaw Ghetto uprising.
Nearly sixty-five years ago Israel declared its independence and won the war that secured a Jewish state. But its narrow and permeable postwar armistice lines permitted incessant cross-border terrorist raids. For Egypt, Syria and Jordan, the mere existence of a Jewish state remained an unbearable intrusion into the Arab Middle East. As Egyptian President Nasser declared, “The danger of Israel lies in the very existence of Israel.”
For anyone with historical memory the expulsion of Jews – by the Romans, English, French, Spaniards, Nazis, and Muslims – instantly evokes tragic episodes in Jewish history. Now the state of Israel expels Jews from their homes. Something is amiss in Zion.
Near the end of the nineteenth century, Theodor Herzl, the Viennese journalist who would wrestle with the plight of Jews amid the enticements and dangers of modernity, felt trapped. For his son’s sake he considered conversion to Christianity; to solve the vexing “Jewish Question” he even fantasized the mass conversion of Jews.
The recent kerfluffle over Israeli government video ads and billboard posters, designed to entice wayward yordim to return home, instead exposed the troubled psyche of American Jews.
In the good old days, Forest Hills, New York – where I grew up between 1939 and 1951 – was a shtetl for assimilated American Jews. Like my parents, all our neighbors were American-born offspring of Eastern European immigrants. A generation removed from their identity conflicts, we children knew that Forest Hills, liberated from Judaism, was our promised land.
With Sgt. Gilad Shalit safely returned in exchange for 1,027 Palestinian terrorists and murderers, celebration – propelled by wishful avoidance – spread throughout Israel.
In May 1967 Rabbi Tzvi Yehuda Kook spoke to his former Mercaz HaRav students at their annual Independence Day reunion in Jerusalem. Usually a festive day of celebration, this year was different. Rabbi Kook sorrowfully recalled his feeling of despair nineteen years earlier, when the State of Israel was born: “I was torn to pieces. I could not celebrate.” Suddenly he cried out: “They have divided my land. Where is our Hebron? Have we forgotten it? And where is our Shechem? And our Jericho – will we forget them?”
Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/911-commemoration-revisited/2011/09/14/
Scan this QR code to visit this page online: