web analytics
October 21, 2014 / 27 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

How Obama is ‘Saving’ the Middle Class

What Obama means by 'saving' the Middle Class is turning them into welfare clients.

2011186950101688296S600x600Q85

President Barack Obama won re-election by selling the idea that he was the champion of the middle class.  Now he is forcing them into poverty and driving them from their homes.

That is the effect of new taxes going into effect on Jan. 1, regardless of how negotiations on the fiscal cliff turn out (unless, as seems unlikely, Congress decides to extend all of the Bush tax cuts to everyone).  The new marginal rates on dividends and interest (43.4%) and capital gains (20%, or 23.8% including the ObamaCare surcharge for high earners) will be devastating for the middle class.

Not only will it apply to those not-so-rich high earners who breach the $200,000 level, but it will harm those under the limit by undermining their desire to get ahead.  Why work longer or harder with 43.4% of marginal income going straight to Washington, another 15% to 20% going to state and local taxes, and 55% of whatever’s left going to death taxes when you pass on?  It’s easier to do what Obama wants and just stay poor.

New tax rates are just the beginning.  There’s the failure to address the Alternative Minimum Tax.  And with the president’s unwillingness to negotiate, there’s the restoration of higher tax rates on all earners.  There is also a host of indirect taxes, such as an onerous tax on medical device makers and lower reimbursements to doctors and hospitals, that will be passed on to consumers one way or another.

Altogether, Obama is “saving the middle class” with a $494-billion tax hike, three-fourths of it on the middle class.

Those who will be hurt the most are small businessmen, professionals, and modestly affluent retirees.  Many of these filers claim more than $200,000 on their tax returns, but they are hardly the evil 1% that Obama vilified during the campaign.  They operate family farms and small construction companies.  They are dentists and accountants.  They are the hardworking owners of retail stores and fast-food outlets.  In short, they are middle-class Americans.

Granted, they are successful.  But isn’t success what Americans aspire to?  By raising taxes on the middle class and especially on those among the middle class who are more successful than others, Obama is sending the message that Americans might as well not aspire to anything.  If they do, they too can expect to be taxed back into dependency.

That has been the plan all along.  That’s why the president exudes such spite toward those who aspire to be rich (while the Buffetts and Zuckerbergs who support him get a free ride).  As far as the left is concerned, all Americans should be dependent on government.  When’s the last time Obama celebrated the success of anyone other than someone like Christopher Brian Bridges (aka “Ludacris”)?  When’s the last time he spoke in a heartfelt manner about the great gift of capitalism and the everyday sacrifices of those in the middle class who make it work?

Never.  What he constantly proclaims is the glorious benefit of Big Government, with the implication that those who control Big Government possess an absolute right to rule over the middle class.  That is why he insists that Congress hand over control of the debt ceiling.  And to make government bigger, Obama demands bigger revenues.  Why should he negotiate?  On January 1, he gets up to half a trillion more in revenues to force more Americans into dependency.

Next week, all or part of that half-trillion in taxes is going into effect, including the Obama death tax.  Just think of those family farms whose owners pass away in the new year.  With Obama blocking reform, rates will return to 55% of assets over $1 million (in addition to whatever state death taxes are due).  At current prices, a typical 200-acre Midwestern farm is now valued at nearly $2 million.  That farm will have to be sold or mortgaged to pay estate taxes.  It will be difficult for surviving family members, who may be dependent on the farm for their livelihoods and may already have been operating the farm for years, to continue operating “half a farm.”  But that’s what Obama wants.

Small business owners are in the same boat. In order to pay that 55% death tax, many who inherit a franchise, a retail operation, or even a service station will be forced to sell the business.  And everyone who worked at that business loses his job.

The death tax is just as unfair to those who do not operate a business but have saved diligently all their lives.  Inheritors will be forced to sell stocks, bonds, land, and even precious family heirlooms to pay the tax.

And what happens to all of this money — the proceeds from the family farms, the franchisees, the retail shops, the estates of small investors?  It goes to fund the greatest pay-to-play scheme ever concocted.  It rewards the welfare class, the union bosses, the trial lawyers, the crony capitalists, and the armies of lobbyists and community organizers who support the Democratic Party.

And for this, the entire middle class is to be ground into the dust.  And the country as a whole will be condemned to generations of poverty and serfdom.

That is what is at stake in the current negotiations.  Of course Obama is intransigent.  He is determined to destroy the middle class and force them into dependency, where they will join the mushrooming welfare class — the 47 million on food stamps, the 23 million still looking for work, and the 100 million who have dropped out of the labor force altogether.  He is far more concerned about renewing unemployment benefits than he is about creating jobs.

Obama’s idea of “saving” the middle class is extending unemployment benefits, increasing welfare payments to single moms, and boosting the earned income credit for low earners.  That kind of assistance doesn’t save the middle class — it just turns them into welfare clients.  But, of course, that’s the point.  Move them out of the middle class and into dependency.  And while you’re at it, make them actually believe you’re saving them.

Originally published at the American Thinker, under the title “‘Saving’ the Middle Class.

About the Author: Dr. Jeffrey Folks is the author of Heartland of the Imagination (2011).


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

8 Responses to “How Obama is ‘Saving’ the Middle Class”

  1. Charlie Hall says:

    Why does the JP continue to run uninformed columnists? No US State has state and local income taxes as high as 15%. Dividends and capital gains continue to get a massive tax break, with a top marginal rate approximately half that of those of us who work for a living. (Remember also that dividends and capital gains are also exempt from social security tax.) The estate tax rate is 40%, not 55%, applying to estates over $5 million, not $1 million — and that threshold is adjusted for inflation. Furthermore, the law continues another massive tax break: Not only does an estate of $5 million get exempted from the estate tax, it continues a total exemption from capital gains taxes up to the value of the estate at the time of death.

    Why does the Jewish Press continue to publish such motzi shem ra?

  2. Economics is hard. They know they don't like the president so they hook around for reasons to hate him. Since the facts confuse them, they don't value them; instead, they just make up what they think the facts should be and use their made-up b.s. like they do here, to denigrate the president.

  3. Mark SoFla says:

    Why? Because they're uninformed .. and that's very bad for a newspaper! It appears to me that this article was partially written before the recent tax agreement, and partially written after. In other words, it's a hodgepodge of incorrect facts mixed with a few correct ones. #badjournalism

  4. How sure are you on your info

  5. Charlie Hall says:

    100% certain.

    State tax rates:

    http://www.taxadmin.org/fta/rate/corp_inc.pdf

    New estate tax rules:

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/deborahljacobs/2013/01/02/after-the-fiscal-cliff-deal-estate-and-gift-tax-explained/

    And the big exemption for estates that are subject to the estate tax (even if too small to pay estate tax):

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stepped-up_basis

    George Steinbrenner died during 2010 when there was no estate tax. His sons end up paying much more in capital gains taxes than they would have in estate taxes when they finally sell the Yankees.

  6. Charlie Hall says:

    The only part of this that is obscure is the Stepped Up Basis rule. But anyone who doesn't know about the Stepped Up Basis rule should not be writing about tax policy.

  7. Charlie Hall says:

    Crony Capitalism is a long-established tradition in American history, going back at least to the 1770s. We forget that the First Bank of the United States, the Erie Canal, the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, the transcontinental railroads, and 2/3 of the New York City Subway were a product of Crony Capitalism. Its use declined with the rise of the Public Authority in the 20th century; there is a good argument that Crony Capitalism actually provides more accountability (and the third alternative is out and out socialism).

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Steve Emerson, author, journalist and terrorism expert.
Haaretz Smears American Terrorism Expert with Political Hit Job
Latest Indepth Stories
Map of Syria-Turkish border area, pinpointing Kurdish border town of Kobani, just taken by ISIS terror forces Oct 7, 2014.

Turkey and Iran the 2 regional powers surrounding the ISIS conflict gain from a partial ISIS victory

The Rosenstrasse area of Berlin, where Jewish husbands of non-Jewish German wives were held.

Emigration from Israel is at an all-time low, far lower than immigration to Israel from Europe.

NY rally against Met Opera's 'Death of Klinghoffer' opera. Sept. 22, 2014.

Leon Klinghoffer’s daughters: “‘Klinghoffer’ is justified as ‘a work of art’…This is an outrage.”

Guess who's behind the door?

Do you seriously think that as you kidnap our children we should medically treat and help yours?

Sometimes collective action against the heinous acts of the majority is not enough. The world should not only support the blockade of Gaza; it must enforce the dismantling of Hamas.

The Arab Spring has challenged Jordan with the task of gradual reform with regard to its monarchy.

Israel offered Syria the entire Golan Heights, only to find that the Syrians were demanding MORE!

Israeli hasbara too can be described at best as pathetic, at worst non existent.

A ‘good news’ story from the Nepal avalanche disaster to warm your heart. Take out your Kleenex.

Journalists see the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as morality play: Israel=evil; Palestine=innocent

Warsaw Ghetto: At its height, the Nazis walled in some 500,000 Jews within the1.3 square mile area.

While police officers face dangers every day on the job, Jews also face danger in their daily lives.

Carter developed a fondness for Arafat believing “they were both ordained to be peacemakers by God”

If Hamas is ISIS, the world asks, why didn’t Israel destroy it given justification and opportunity?

That key is the disarming of Hamas and the demilitarization of Gaza – as the U.S., EU, and others agreed to in principle at the end of Operation Protective Edge.

We have no doubt there are those who deeply desire to present themselves as being of a gender that is not consistent with their anatomy, and we take no joy in the pain and embarrassment they suffer.

More Articles from Jeffrey Folks
2011186950101688296S600x600Q85

What Obama means by ‘saving’ the Middle Class is turning them into welfare clients.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/how-obama-is-saving-the-middle-class/2013/01/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: