web analytics
March 3, 2015 / 12 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Here, Take it!


Business-Halacha-logo

The Golds were planning a two-week vacation. Mrs. Gold did not want to travel with her jewelry, but was concerned about leaving it in their apartment while they traveled.

“What should we do with my jewelry?” Mrs. Gold asked her husband. “I’m afraid to leave it unattended in the apartment. There has been a rash of robberies recently in the building.”

“We could hide the jewelry in one of the closets,” suggested Mr. Gold.

“I’m not happy with that,” said Mrs. Gold. “If a thief searches the apartment, he still might find it. We’ll be away for two weeks.”

“If you’re comfortable, we can leave the jewelry with our neighbors, the Ehrlichs,” said Mr. Gold. “They have a safe in their apartment.”

“That would be much better,” said Mrs. Gold. “I would feel more secure knowing the jewelry was stowed away.”

Mr. Gold called the Ehrlichs and asked if he could bring over some valuables to put in their safe while they would be away on vacation.

“That’s fine,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “We’ll be happy to keep it for you in our safe. It’s not such a big safe, though, so focus on the smaller items.”

Mrs. Gold gathered together the valuable jewelry she wasn’t planning to take and put it in a bag. Mr. Gold brought it over to the Ehrlichs. He quickly showed Mr. Ehrlich the contents: some necklaces, earrings, rings, and some gold pins. Then he knotted the bag carefully and gave it to Mr. Ehrlich to put in his safe.

“Have a safe trip,” Mr. Ehrlich wished Mr. Gold. “Enjoy your vacation!”

When the Golds returned two weeks later, Mr. Gold went to retrieve the bag of jewelry from the Ehrlichs. Mr. Ehrlich took the bag out of the safe.

“Thank you very much,” said Mr. Gold.

“No problem at all,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “We were happy to help.”

Mr. Gold took the bag and untied it. He perused the contents. With a concerned look, he said: “Would you mind if I examined the contents before retuning home?”

“You’re welcome to,” said Mr. Ehrlich, “but I assure you that nobody touched the bag while you were gone.”

Mr. Gold took out the items one by one. “There was also a golden pin with a diamond tip that is missing!” he said.

“I have no idea whether there was or wasn’t such a pin,” said Mr. Ehrlich in an offended tone. “I didn’t examine the contents of the bag carefully when you gave it to me. I assure you, though, that whatever you gave is what you got back!”

“But I’m sure the pin was in the bag,” said Mr. Gold softly. “You’re obligated in a Torah oath of modeh b’miktzas, partial admission.”

Mr. Ehrlich paled. “I’m not swearing any such oath,” he said.

“Then you’ll have to pay,” said Mr. Gold. “We’re going to have to take this up with Rabbi Dayan.”

Mr. Gold and Mr. Ehrlich met with Rabbi Dayan. “I gave Mr. Ehrlich a bag of jewelry to keep in his safe and a diamond-tipped pin is missing from the bag,” said Mr. Gold. “He doesn’t know whether he received the pin but claims he returned the bag intact. Is this not a case of modeh b’miktzas, partial admission?”

“At first glance, it might seem so,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “Mr. Ehrlich admits to having received a bag of jewelry, but denies having received that pin in the bag. As such, he would be obligated in a Torah oath to deny the claim.”

“However,” continued Rabbi Dayan, “the truth is that Mr. Ehrlich is not required a Torah oath.”

“Why not?” asked Mr. Gold.

“There is a significant exception to the rule of partial admission known as heilech, ‘Here, take it,’ ” answered Rabbi Dayan. “If the defendant admits partially, but is prepared to return the admitted items – or to pay immediately in beis din the sum that he admits – we do not view the case as one of partial admission; he is not required the Torah oath of partial admission.” (C.M. 87:1; 88:24)

“I don’t quite follow the logic,” said Mr. Ehrlich. “Why should that make a difference?”

“Since Mr. Ehrlich returned the remaining jewelry, the entire litigation revolves only around the golden brooch,” explained Rabbi Dayan. “Mr. Gold claims he entrusted a brooch; Mr. Ehrlich denies it. Thus, there is no partial admission of the litigation claim. At most, Mr. Gold would be obligated in a rabbinic oath.” (See also C.M. 88:23.)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Here, Take it!”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu addressing Congress.
The “Esther Moment” and Why There is Nothing “Random” About This Day
Latest Judaism Stories
wine

One can drink up to the Talmud’s criterion to confuse Mordechai and Haman-but not beyond.

Hur and Aharon holding up Moshe's hands as Joshua battled Amalek.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Esther Denouncing Haman

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

Niehaus-022715

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

The mishloach manos of times gone by were sometimes simple and sometimes elaborate, but the main focus was on the preparation of the delicious food they contained.

Does Hashem ever go away and not pay attention to us?

In other words, the Torah is an expression of the Way that we must follow in order to live a divine-like life and to bond in the highest way possible with God or Being Itself.

The Chasam Sofer answers that one of only prohibited from wearing a garment that contains shatnez if he does so while wearing the garment for pleasure purposes.

The avodah (service) of the kohen gadol is vital and highly sensitive; the world’s very existence depends on it.

Moreover, even if the perpetrator of the capital offense is never actually executed, such as when the fatal act was unintentional, Kam Lei applies and the judge cannot award damages.

Forever After?
‘Obligated for Challahh and Not Terumah’
(Kesubos 25a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

This was a spontaneous act of rest after the miracle of vanquishing their respective foes. The following year they celebrated on the same days as a minhag.

The way we must to relate to our young adult children is to communicate with genuine loving-kindness

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Business-Halacha-logo

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

“I don’t accept this,” said Mr. Zummer. “I want you to finish! You’re not allowed to just stop in the middle!”

“That’s what you’re wondering?” laughed Mr. Rubin. “That ring is not mine at all. A relative gave me money to buy it for him.”

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

“The issue is not just logistical,” replied Mr. Kahn. “I thought that halacha requires that the beginning of the adjudication and acceptance of testimony be during daytime.” (C.M. 5:2; 28:24)

A few days, Mrs. Feldman called back. “I would prefer a nice cake rather than the chocolate.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/here-take-it/2013/02/27/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: