The Jewish Press

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. my, my! they can preserve the foreskin when they cut it off and if the baby grows up to be bald, just bring it out of storage… wow. i guess that makes it worth the pain.

    Comment by Patricia Robinett — October 23, 2013 @ 3:31 AM

  2. http://www.medicaldaily.com/circumcised-foreskin-aids-baldness-cure-scientists-discover-new-path-hair-regeneration-260462

    Comment by Michael Skowron — October 23, 2013 @ 3:49 AM

  3. You misjudged me. I am totally against it, I posted it only for additional information to the rather short article you quoted and am interested in other peoples opinion about it.

    Comment by Michael Skowron — October 23, 2013 @ 5:18 AM

  4. Yeah, troll. Be sure to bring the Third Reich into this. Bleep you and bleep Foreskinman, too, rectal orifice.

    Comment by Dan Silagi — October 23, 2013 @ 1:49 PM

  5. Editor??? Publisher??? You sure are ignorant, woman.

    Comment by Chaiya Eitan — October 23, 2013 @ 1:52 PM

  6. Amber Baxley We don't need this as a 'reason' to do brit milah – we are commanded to do it. Nobody is telling you to do it.

    Comment by Chaiya Eitan — October 23, 2013 @ 1:54 PM

  7. How great!! If only my husband's parents had kept his! But I love him anyway with his baldness!

    Comment by Chaiya Eitan — October 23, 2013 @ 1:55 PM

  8. Don't try this at home! You'll wind up looking like a dickhead….

    Comment by Simon Soesan — October 23, 2013 @ 1:58 PM

  9. LOL!

    Comment by Toby Kaufman — October 23, 2013 @ 2:07 PM

  10. Apparently it gives you enhanced cheek bones, a cleft chin and pouty lips too.

    Comment by Steve Brown — October 23, 2013 @ 3:38 PM

  11. Chaiya Eitan ignorant of what, chalya? what would you like me to know that i am ignoring? thanks. did you know there is no circumcision covenant in the original history of the jewish people, "The Book of J"? it was edited hundreds of years after abraham's death to include circumcision – same with the story about dinah… no mass circumcision and no massacre… also embellished.

    Comment by Patricia Robinett — October 23, 2013 @ 4:55 PM

  12. Robbing Peter to pay Paul. So what if this were baby labias and/or clitorises they were using? Then suddenly "Oh no! This is wrong!" Right?

    You know what's funny, if a man wants his foreskin back and undergoes "restoration," there is some sort of mental problem the matter with him right? But wanting a dead part of your body back, like hair, is perfectly fine, and it's OK to exploit the flesh of children to get it right? Um… HELLO???

    Comment by Joseph Lewis — October 23, 2013 @ 7:48 PM

  13. Best of luck.

    Comment by Deborah Mgedzi — October 24, 2013 @ 7:15 AM

  14. Is the new hair kosher?

    Comment by Michael Morin — October 24, 2013 @ 1:52 PM

  15. How careless of people who discard their foreskins! Do the scientists find them laying about, or perhaps in waste bins/trash cans? There is are no hair follicles on my foreskin – lol I have visions of bald guys with faking foreskins stuck to their heads! I am sure the science is good, but I'd prefer to stay the way that I am thanks.

    Comment by Andrew Fairey — October 24, 2013 @ 3:08 PM

  16. Oh no – I just realised that they use the foreskins of newly born boys – presumably without their consent ("just sign away your foreskin on the dotted line boys"). There is something vaguely unethical about that. "Discarded" now sounds like a euphemism.

    Comment by Andrew Fairey — October 24, 2013 @ 3:12 PM

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Close this window.

0.139 Powered by WordPress