web analytics
August 28, 2015 / 13 Elul, 5775
At a Glance
Blogs
Sponsored Post


Peter Beinart’s Cocoon

The restrictions Beinart condemns today came because of Palestinian terror, not the other way around.
cocoon

In the New York Review of Books, Peter Beinart is upset that the organized American Jewish community doesn’t invite Palestinian Arabs to speak at their events. He believes that American Jews don’t give enough empathy to Palestinian Arabs.

For the most part, Palestinians do not speak in American synagogues or write in the Jewish press. The organization Birthright, which since 1999 has taken almost 350,000 young Diaspora Jews—mostly Americans—to visit Israel, does not venture to Palestinian towns and cities in the West Bank. Of the more than two hundred advertised speakers at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s (AIPAC) 2013 Policy Conference, two were Palestinians. By American Jewish standards, that’s high. The American Jewish Committee’s Global Forum earlier this year, which advertised sixty-four speakers, did not include a single Palestinian.

…Guidelines like Hillel’s—which codify the de facto restrictions that exist in many establishment American Jewish groups—make the organized American Jewish community a closed intellectual space, isolated from the experiences and perspectives of roughly half the people under Israeli control. And the result is that American Jewish leaders, even those who harbor no animosity toward Palestinians, know little about the reality of their lives.

Beinart grudgingly admits:

This lack of familiarity with Palestinian life also inclines many in the organized American Jewish world to assume that Palestinian anger toward Israel must be a product solely of Palestinian pathology. Rare is the American Jewish discussion of Israel that does not include some reference to the textbooks and television programs that “teach Palestinians to hate.” These charges have some merit. Palestinian schools and media do traffic in anti-Semitism and promote violence.

But:

Still, what’s often glaringly absent from the American Jewish discussion of Palestinian hatred is any recognition that some of it might stem not from what Palestinians read or hear about the Jewish state, but from the way they interact with it in their daily lives.

Beinart is at least as guilty of willful blindness as the American Jewish establishment he is insulting. His “Open Zion” site all but ignores the Palestinian Arab hate and antisemitism, just as he attempts to minimize it and contextualize it here as a natural result of things Israelis did. He says that most terror attacks are the result of anger at Israeli actions from the first intifada, without mentioning who started the first intifada. No doubt Israel’s initial reaction was more severe than would be acceptable today, but at the time Palestinian Arabs from the West Bank and Gaza would travel freely to pre-1967 Israel and Israelis would visit freely to Arab areas, without fear.

The restrictions that Beinart is so upset about today came because of Palestinian Arab terror, not the other way around.

Moreover, while Beinart talks about checkpoints that exist today, what does he think would happen if a two-state solution that he so passionately supports would occur? They wouldn’t be checkpoints – there would be national borders. Try commuting to another country every day, let alone an enemy country, and see how painless it is.

American Jewish leaders have access to The New York Times, the BBC, the Guardian and, yes, Open Zion. Jewish Americans read Thomas Friedman and Roger Cohen. The idea that they somehow live in a pro-Likud bubble is ridiculous. They know far more about Palestinian Arab claims and grievances than readers of Open Zion know about the day to day incitement against Israel and Jews in Palestinian Arab lives – not just “textbooks and television programs” but virtually every newspaper, every school, every media.

This is the stuff I expose along with MEMRI, Palestinian Media Watch and others.

Beinart would like to pretend that we cherry pick the worst examples. To an extent that is true. That’s how the media works – to show the worst in order to illuminate the facts – something Beinart is doing in this very essay.

However, as someone who reads quite a bit of Arabic media daily, I can assure Beinart and my readers that the hate isn’t an anomaly, while people like Salam Fayyad are the silent majority. No – within the “cocoon” of Palestinian Arab life, there is zero tolerance for any viewpoint that is the least bit conciliatory to real coexistence and peace. The hate is pervasive, not anomalous. Anyone who would speak to an American Jewish organization would, by that very fact, lose all legitimacy from their own people.

Beinart knows this, but he won’t dare say it.

One need only look at this post from yesterday to see that this is true. Not only is there virtually no voice for true peace among Palestinian Arabs, but even the slightest attempts at coexistence are demonized and practitioners blacklisted.

How often does Open Zion report on this? For that matter, how much does the NYT, BBC and other mainstream media (the recent Forbes piece being a rare exception) report on this?

Where are the Palestinian Arab “Open Zions?” Where are the people who really want co-existence who can speak out without being tarred that worst of all insults – “collaborators”?  You will not find any Arab Beinarts writing for Palestinian Arabic media.

Beinart’s own self-created cocoon where he pretends that most Palestinian Arabs want peace is even more bizarre. In his entire lengthy essay, he does not mention Islamic fundamentalism once. The reason is once again willful blindness – Beinart knows that there is no way that fundamentalist Muslims, represented by Hamas – winner in the last PA elections – would ever accept Israel’s existence in any manner.

So Beinart chooses to ignore that problem and pretend that Salam Fayyad, an unelected former prime minister who barely scraped together 2.4% of the vote for his own party, is mainstream and Hamas is all but nonexistent.

Even though he says admits that “Virtually every Palestinian I’ve ever met considers Zionism to be colonialist, imperialist, and racist. ” Sure, let’s invite them over to the Hadassah meeting so we can hear all about it!

That is willful blindness of a far worse kind than anything he can say about the American Jewish establishment.

The real cocoon is the one that looks at the Middle East and pretends that it is Jewish American leadership that is somehow more in denial than liberals like Beinart. The real cocoon is the place where the extent of Palestinian Arab intransigence and hate is downplayed and glossed over as simply a few TV programs and textbooks, with no mention of, say, Gaza being controlled by a separate party that considers all of Israel to be “occupied.” The real cocoon is the place where, even in light of the Arab Spring, Muslim fundamentalism simply isn’t worth mentioning as a problem.

Israel doesn’t want to oppress anybody, but it has an obligation to protect its citizens – the supreme obligation of any nation. The line it needs to walk in order to do that it a thin and jagged one, and one that for the most part has been successful. Today there is less terror than ever before even as restrictions on Palestinian Arabs are being slowly lifted. This is what should be emphasized, highlighted and encouraged.

Beinart, though, is blind to the real facts – because he is the one who lives in a cocoon.

Visit Elder of Ziyon.

About the Author: Elder blogs at http://elderofziyon.blogspot.co.il/

The author's opinion does not necessarily reflect the opinion of The Jewish Press.

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

6 Responses to “Peter Beinart’s Cocoon”

  1. Tim Upham says:

    Sorry Elder of Ziyon, Dr. Izzeldin Abuelaish has spoken at several synagogues in the United States. I question if Elder of Ziyon's hate is not pervasive. It sure sounds so to me. Now the are calling Peter Beinarts an "Anti-Semitic Muslim Nazi." They already called me one.

  2. and then there's the measured, inclusive, lovable comments of that paragon: Rabbi Ovadia YOSEF (of "blessed memory"…depending on whom you consider worthy oa being BLESSED!

  3. Robert Taylor Yiou are a pitiful charlatan Taylor, who peddles his vacuous, empty nonsense BS over at ToI. The same applies to addled-mind Upham. You are both syrupy soft-antisemites and idiots. Get lost u 2 old morons.

  4. Gabor? You survived the man-eating sturgeon in the Danube? Good to hear from you! (and thanks for the heartfelt comments!)…(all the best to you and yours!)

  5. Tim Upham says:

    Gabor Hungary What would Anti-Semites be reading "The Jewish Press" for? You should be on the website of the Jewish Defense League. Its president, Irv Rubin, committed suicide after it was uncovered that he wanted the league to kill Muslims living in the United States. They were also going to kill California Congressman, Darrell Issa, who is of Lebanese descent. Who would anyone want to kill Marlo Thomas? Do you think your insults towards us is going to stop the Jobbik Party?

  6. Ira Steinberg says:

    Did you actually read the article? He acknowledges the hatred and anti-semitism of Palestinian extremists and domestic activists. He just says that we can't use their hatred as an excuse for lazy thinking and a failure to understand their perspective and the reality of life on both sides of the green line. It's almost as if your response proves his point about the epistemic closure in the Jewish community.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Swiss Amb. to Iran Giulo Haas presents his credentials to Iranian Pres. Rouhani
‘US and Iranian Cartoon Doves’ Shown Defecating on Bibi by Swiss Amb to Iran
Latest Blogs Stories
haredim-no-women-allowed-sign

The Halacha of shmirat einayim (guarding one’s eyes) is incumbent on the MAN; it’s his obligation

Doug Goldstein

Dem. presidential candidate Doug Shreffler talks about his campaign & its motto “as good as it gets”

Jewish Press Blogger, Jordana Brown

I’ve decided to move away from my safety net-and I wouldn’t change that decision for anything.

Was “Jerusalem” the song Matisyahu planned to perform? It was the PERFECT response to BDS campaign

If the world’s winds of hatred bring Jews to Israel we are ready, joyfully offering them a home here

At what age should the realization start setting in for kids that we live in an uncertain society?

Spain’s SeaWorld canceled Zionist-spy dolphin’s performance unless it supports a Palestinian state

How does the Iranian deal affect anti-terrorist legislation adopted by a number of US states?

Shabbat afternoon soccer games, a tradition in Israel’s league, may become a thing of the past.

Calling the Jewish Press‘closest thing to a frum English-language weekly’ insults the publication

So long as Jews dance for the sheer pleasure of thanking God, Israel will never be defeated!

Why are wealthy people less likely to gossip? So if you get rich you’ll cut down on Lashon Hora!

Matisyahu was bounced from a music festival because he wouldn’t sign pro-BDS, anti-Israel manifesto.

Danon is still young, perhaps one day he’ll succeed Bibi. Representing Israel in UN is good training

I think it has been a major tactical mistake for Israel to consider Iran a particularly Israeli problem. And it is of crucial importance for Israel and Israelis to stop thinking that we have any influence on international leaders when it comes to anything, including international policy re: Iran. That’s why I think that Yair […]

More Articles from Elder of Ziyon
The Kotel, 1913

This year it is hard to concentrate on anything but Iran building nuclear weapons to destroy Israel

The more accurate name for "Amnesty International"

To Amnesty International bashing Israel’s far more important than small details like truth&accuracy

“While neither leader(Obama/Bibi) monopolized mistakes, only 1 leader made them deliberately(Obama)”

The contrast between a Dem pretending to love Israel & a Dem who truly loves Israel is CRYSTAL CLEAR

The UNHRC chose Schabas because of his well-known attitudes towards Israel, not in spite of them!

There is no question whatsoever that Odeh was behind the fatal bombing of a SuperSol market in 1969

Beware of the “creative license” reporters and spokespeople take to claim maximal harm to Gazans by Israel.

Pope asked to dine with poor families, but church leaders instead use locals as props to slam Israel!

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/blogs/elder-of-ziyon/peter-beinarts-cocoon/2013/09/03/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: