web analytics
July 7, 2015 / 20 Tammuz, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post


Whose Jerusalem?

Keeping-Jerusalem

Nearly eighty percent of Americans believe the Bible is either absolutely accurate or at least the “inspired word of God,” surveys have shown. Around the world, Christianity and Islam comprise an estimated eighty-four percent of the world’s population – demonstrating that the Bible clearly has an extraordinary influence over humanity.

It is puzzling, then, that the concept of “exclusive Jewish rights” to Jerusalem has not yet caught on internationally.

The Bible tells us that Yerushalayim has been central to Judaism and the Jewish nation for nearly four millennia, ever since our Patriarch Avraham nearly sacrificed his son Yitzchak on Mt. Moriah (Genesis 22). The Torah specifically emphasizes the city’s holiness and importance, repeatedly calling it “the place that God will choose” (Deut. 12,18; 14,23; et al.). When the Israelites later conquered the land under Joshua Bin Nun’s command, one of the first cities they took was Jerusalem (except for its Jebusite quarter). It was around the year 2900 C.E. when King David finally and officially made it Israel’s capital (Samuel II:5).

The Bible directly mentions Jerusalem well over six hundred times (not even including references to Zion). It is critical to remind ourselves that the Holy City is not mentioned even once in the Koran; Muslims actually turn their backs on Jerusalem when they pray.

Jerusalem has always been the center of our national and spiritual existence. We turn in its directly as we mention it repeatedly in our daily and holiday prayers, and we constantly remember the destruction of its centerpiece – the Holy Temple – with special annual days of mourning, smashing a glass at weddings, leaving our homes unfinished, and more.

Even the late prime minister Yitzchak Rabin, who signed the Oslo Accords for Israel, could not envision giving up Jerusalem. “If they told us that the price of peace is giving up on a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty,” he told a group of Tel Aviv schoolchildren shortly before he was killed, “I would respond, ‘Let’s do without peace.’ ”

But as hostile leftist pundits and others often emphasize, King David lived a long time ago; much has changed since then, and few if any international rights on the Holy City remain to Israel and the Jews.

True?

Not at all.

“Jerusalem belongs to the Jews, by international law,” concludes Dr. Jacques Gauthier, a non-Jewish Canadian lawyer who spent 20 years researching the issue. His 1,300-page doctoral dissertation on Jerusalem and its legal history determines that the League of Nations and the United Nations gave the Jewish people title to the city of Jerusalem.

The process began at the famous San Remo Conference of April 1920, when the four Principal Allied Powers of World War I – Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan – affirmed the Balfour Declaration creating a Jewish national home in the Land of Israel. The San Remo Resolutions were unanimously confirmed by the League of Nations on July 24, 1922.

It is fascinating to note that the resolution’s wording made sure to grant the Arabs of the Holy Land individual civil and religious rights – but specifically not those of a national political nature. Calling for “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people,” it emphasized that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine.”

The League of Nations then took over, resolving to recognize “the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine and…the grounds for reconstituting their national home in that country.” No such recognition of Arab rights in Palestine was granted, nor was any distinction made regarding Jerusalem.

When the United Nations succeeded the League in 1945 and assumed the latter’s commitments and obligations, its Resolution 181 of 1947 made two major changes: It granted the Arabs political rights in western Palestine, and also proposed, non-bindingly, a special international regime for Jerusalem. This regime was to last for ten years, at which time the city residents were to vote on the future governance of the city.

These arrangements never took effect. Jordan blatantly violated them by conquering eastern Jerusalem in 1948, and even violated its Armistice Agreement with Israel by refusing to allow Jewish access to the Western Wall, desecrating and destroying synagogues and Jewish holy sites, and more. The UN took no action.

About the Author: Chaim Silberstein is president of Keep Jerusalem-Im Eshkachech and the Jerusalem Capital Development Fund. He was formerly a senior adviser to Israel's minister of tourism. Hillel Fendel, past senior editor at Israel National News/Arutz-7, is a veteran writer on Jerusalem affairs. Both have lived in Jerusalem and now reside in Beit El.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

One Response to “Whose Jerusalem?”

  1. Matt McLaughlin says:

    The “Balfour Declaration” was the single most significant political development in the history of Zionism between the First Zionist Conference of 1897 and the United Nations’ vote in 1948 establishing the state of Israel.

    The Balfour Declaration came, as it were, ex cathedra from on high; the coalition cabinet represented all the parties – save the Asquith Liberals – and had a much greater degree of autonomy than any peacetime cabinet. It operated enshrouded in secrecy, gave no reasons for the Declaration, outlined no conditions – other than those in the Declaration itself – and expected no accountability. The Declaration was not debated in either of the Houses of Parliament and like most foreign policy issues, was never approved by the British legislature.

    http://www.cambridge.org/aus/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif in Vienna.
Iran Deal to Miss Fifth Deadline
Latest Indepth Stories
Terms of Surrender

Dear Pres. Obama, A “deal” in which one side makes all the concessions is, of course, a “surrender.”

Michael Oren, Israel's Former Ambassador to the United States

ALLY is a terrific read because Oren has a mission: Defending&protecting the Jewish State of Israel.

George Soros: No friend of Israel

George Soros: “European anti-Semitism is the result of the policies of Israel and the United States”

President Obama

Sources say seemingly irreconcilable differences between the 2 main parties, Washington and Tehran.

Instead of accepting reality, the President is trying to hold on to an illusion.

Those who suggest further capitulation to Iran are wrongly harming the interests of the West.

Few Arab Israelis found anything positive in the decision of its MKS to join any Gaza flotilla.

US Jews prefer to be like their non-Jewish liberal friends complaining about “settlements” and Bibi

New Israel Fund & its supporters must be countered; Israel’s in the midst of an unprecedented storm

PM Netanyahu this week identified ISIS and Iran as Israel’s primary threat. It is a planetary threat that carries the promise of peace.

Haym Solomon, overlooked hero of the Revolutionary War, was America’s “Funding Father.”

Latvia, July 4, 1941 they forced many Jews in the shul putting it on fire; everyone was burned alive

There’s blood on the reporters’ hands AND New Israel Fund for funding groups feeding lies to the UN

Respect & appreciation for our country is not only a civic value but an essential Jewish one as well

When words lose meaning, the world becomes an Orwellian dystopia; a veritable Tower of Babel

Israel, like the non-radical Islamic world. will be happy see the ISIS beheaded for once.

More Articles from Hillel Fendel and Chaim Silberstein / KeepJerusalem.org
Keeping-Jerusalem

Considering the news, it’s not for nothing the Midrash calls Jerusalem the world’s umbilical center

Keeping-Jerusalem

For a peace treaty with the PA, half the Israeli public would agree to divide the Jerusalem

48 years ago this week the IDF with heroism & Divine providence liberated our holy capital Jerusalem

“We returned to this Land not in order to be murdered, or uprooted. We came here to be replanted!”

Negotiations with the PA raises fears that some of Jerusalem will be handed over to foreign control

All Zionist parties must demonstrate that a united Jewish Yerushalayim is an absolute imperative

Israel’s full sovereignty over a united Jerusalem is the only path for true peace in the region.

Despite its name, the Muslim Quarter was home to many Jews and 6 yeshivot in the 19th century

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/keeping-jerusalem/whose-jerusalem/2013/01/30/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: