web analytics
August 20, 2014 / 24 Av, 5774
Israel at War: Operation Protective Edge
 
 
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



Home » InDepth » Op-Eds »

Shortchanging Our Children By Teaching Midrashim Literally


Red Sea splitting

Red Sea splitting
Photo Credit: Chabad.org

The Written Torah’s typically spare prose seems to gloss over this conflict. But the Midrash points to it, and if used properly the story makes us stop and examine her motivations. The metaphor of her extended arm is an expression of God’s directing the actions of Paroh’s daughter. The rabbis are teaching us that her emotional shift toward feeling protective of this baby is as much of a miracle as if God had extended her arm 25 feet.

Leah felt as if a load had been removed from shoulders. At age 14, she was taught – for the first time – the relationship between the Torah and the midrashim. It is my firm belief that all teachers should only teach a Midrash if it helps students discover a deeper message.

Rabbi Simcha and Chaya Feuerman, in a Jewish Press column a couple of years ago titled “Teaching Midrashim to Children” (which is included in the Feuermans’ book Direction: Finding Your Way in Relationships, Parenting & Personal Growth), suggest using the notion of seeking a “moral of the story” for presenting the idea of a deeper meaning to midrashim to children. Here is a good example:

Consider the Midrash which contains a strange twist to the plague of Frogs.

The verse (Shemos 8:2) states: “And the frog went up and covered all of Egypt.” The text uses the singular form when referring to the frogs. Of course, the simple explanation (poshut peshat) is that in Hebrew as in many languages, an entire group or species is labeled in the singular form. However, the Midrash derives from this choice of words that actually one frog rose out of the Nile. However, each and every time an Egyptian tried to hit the frog, instead of it being squashed and killed, it split into several new frogs. Thus, as the frogs began to jump all over, and Egyptians encountered and hit them, the plague grew worse and worse. (See Rashi, Op. Cit.)

To our thinking, there is no question that any classroom of children, encouraged to ponder what the real lesson behind this Midrash is, would draw powerful insights into the nature of problems and how people get further into them. The inescapable lesson of this Midrash is that when you try to stubbornly and pig-headedly fight a problem, as the Egyptians did, instead of thinking about what has gone wrong you will end up panicking and making things far worse. The more the Egyptians fought the frogs, the worse it got. Who among us in life has not panicked and made a situation far worse instead of staying calm and using problem-solving skills?

As our children enter the 21st century and its scientific mindset, it is obligatory for all educators to ensure that our children see the Torah in its most sophisticated light.

About the Author: Rabbi Pinchas Rosenthal is director of the Executive Learning Program at the Manhattan Jewish Experience (www.jewishexperience.org), a cutting-edge outreach program serving young people.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

10 Responses to “Shortchanging Our Children By Teaching Midrashim Literally”

  1. I agree with Rabbi Pinchas. There is a two sided problem though…those who are taught and believe the midrashim are literal accounts…and those who exclude all midrashim with a roll of the eyes and “that’s just medrash!” as in “that’s worthless, a waste of time, too stupid for me.”

  2. Rabbi Rosenthal that is.

  3. Gene Strong says:

    English please.

  4. Gadi D says:

    I was with him till his anthropology class example, which demonstrates why his is also a bad approach. Bowing to peer pressure or academic disdain over matters of belief is contrary to Jewish tradition. What if the professor had used kriyat yam suf as his example of a legend of the Jews and “Leah” had said the exact same thing about it being a miracle? What if her professor then asked her if she really believed that and her fellow students stared at her like they did in Rabbi Rosenthal’s anecdote?

  5. Bryan Baruch says:

    They’re turning them into little morons, like fundamentalist christians. It’s disgusting.

  6. Gadi D says:

    A better approach would be to teach the textual anchor for such midrashim along with the lessons to be learned from them, but also instill a firm foundation of faith that does not discount the possibility of the miraculous. What Leah could have said in her entrance interview when she was unfairly challenged by Rabbi Rosenthal, was that this is the subject of a debate between two tanaim and that indeed it would be interesting to see which one was right. A good teacher would have explained that this machloket exists and that we can learn lessons from both positions.

  7. Gadi D says:

    And I wonder what Rabbi Rosenthal would have done if he were in the anthropology class and was asked about the “legend” having to do with the frogs in Egypt. He discredits the midrashic version of there being one frog that kept splitting, and that’s fine. But does he not realize that the anthropology professor in his example would likely find the very concept of the plague of frogs to be no more than a folk tale as well? His approach does not give “Leah” adequate tools to defend her beliefs at all.

  8. ArtScroll’s “translation” of the Song of Songs is based on the midrash. The literal translation is on the bottom of the page in tiny type.

  9. Jesse Long says:

    Why is fundamentalist Christianity disgusting, Bryan Baruch? Furthermore, why should we even TRUST a guy like you with an avatar of Boris Badenoff, anyway?

  10. Bryan Baruch says:

    It doesn’t even merit a reply.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
James Foley and his Islamic State executioner.
ISIS Beheadings Mark Declared War on the United States
Latest Indepth Stories
ZIM Piraeus in happier days. (Image: ShipSpotting.com user b47b56)

ZIM Piraeus isn’t Israeli-owned or flagged, incidentally, it is Greek operated.

PM Benjamin Netanyahu

Foolish me, thinking the goals were the destruction of Hamas thereby giving peace a real chance.

Sgt. Sean Carmeli, ZT"L

The free-spirted lifestyle didn’t hold your interest; the needs of your people did.

And why would the U.S. align itself on these issues with Turkey and Qatar, longtime advocates of Hamas’s interests?

Several years ago the city concluded that the metzitzah b’peh procedure created unacceptable risks for newborns in terms of the transmission of neo-natal herpes through contact with a mohel carrying the herpes virus.

The world wars caused unimaginable anguish for the Jews but God also scripted a great glory for our people.

Judging by history, every time Hamas rebuilds their infrastructure, they are stronger than before.

His father asked him to read Psalms from the Book of Tehilim every day.

(Reposted with permission from author’s website) Moderate truth-teller Daniel Pipes (Dream) has further moderated his stance on Islam by actually entertaining the idea of “Moderate Islamism”, with Andrew C. McCarthy- whom I’ve debated about this- giving it some credence. We’ve gone from Naming the Enemy -Nazism, Communism- to Renaming the Enemy – “Islamic Totalitarianism”, “Radical Islam”, “Islamism”, […]

Maimonides: “Your 1 mitzva may tip the scales and bring redemption to the entire world and creation”

Jerusalem has been aware of the importance of China to its growth and security.

In other words, how by any rational playbook can one even begin to explain anti-Semitism?

Israel has nine Iron Domes, but you Mr. Hannity are the tenth.

Entire movements within “orthodoxy” propagate a Judaism of outlandish folklore and Jewish mysticism

The Rebbetzin began campaigning to increase public awareness of the importance of saying Amen.

More Articles from Rabbi Pinchas Rosenthal

“I don’t want to learn and that’s it! I go to yeshiva all week and I need a break!” Your son storms off and slams the door.

All you had done was innocently ask him to learn on Shabbos afternoon. Your son, however, felt like a parolee asked to go back into solitary confinement. This is, to say the least, a painful experience for both father and son.

Red Sea splitting

The vast majority of children from the current yeshiva system believe all midrashim are part of the literal account of the events that occurred in the Tanach.

The parents of these children cannot understand the reasons for their children’s lack of interest in Judaism.

    Latest Poll

    Do you think the FAA ban on US flights to Israel is political?






    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/shortchanging-our-children-by-teaching-midrashim-literally/2006/05/31/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: