web analytics
March 27, 2015 / 7 Nisan, 5775
At a Glance
Sections
Sponsored Post


A Response To Dr. G. (Part II)

In Part I, I responded to some of what Dr. G. had said about our role as caregivers.  I reiterated that without legal documentation, you, as the spouse might have little input into the treatment plan for your partner. Whether by design or oversight, not being appointed the Health Proxy may totally cut you out of the care plan and even bar you from receiving treatment information. This week, I’d like to address what Dr. G. said about what being a caregiver requires of us.

 

            Dr. G. writes, “If you are the caregiver or otherwise in charge, you must absolutely do your homework. True, not being a doctor you may have some difficulty knowing what is relevant and what weight to give to various points; but you must do your homework if you are a caregiver you absolutely must know what everything means, you are responsible. If you don’t know it for yourself (and if you are not a doctor or nurse you might not, and the Internet won’t do it), ask the doctor exactly what you should know, and what things mean. If you cannot or will not do the job, the patient should not be in your care.  There is no room for a “good idea, but” approach: either you are able to do the job with all that it involves, and are willing to do it; or you should, for the sake of the patient, stand aside and let the job be done by someone who is both willing and able. And part of that is getting all the knowledge and skills you need.”

 

            Is Dr. G. laying out an impossible task for a caregiver? If the caregiver is young, s/he may be working and raising children while caring for his or her partner.  The situation is at best difficult and often depressing. If the caregiver is older, the ability to grasp the intricacies of the medical knowledge needed may be very difficult to comprehend. Perhaps Dr. G. is correct when he suggests, “for the sake of the patient, stand aside and let the job be done by someone who is both willing and able.” Most of us, as long-term caregivers, have taken care of our spouses alone for so long that we don’t see that there might be an alternative.  We think we are only ones who can deal with our spouse’s medical needs. Perhaps asking someone we trust, someone who may have the time and caring to totally involve themselves in the treatment plan, someone who is willing and able to understand and research medical options and explain them to us and our partners, is an excellent alternative. It would establish a team comprising of you, your spouse and the trusted third party who could then, together, weigh the medical options and come to a consensus that would work in the best interest of the ill person, would be doable for the caregiver and be aligned with the practicalities of the medical system. It would make things so much easier for the caregiver and the physician. It would decrease the stress on everyone. And, decreasing the stress of care giving is as necessary as breathing in a caregiver’s life.

 

            I must admit that when I first read Dr. G.’s comments on the role of the caregiver, it made me very angry. Knowing all too well how overburdened caregivers are, requiring them to be totally informed infuriated me. Where could we find the time to educate ourselves? How could we be expected to take on yet another job? How do we clear our heads from the panic that a medical crisis brings or the overwhelming pain of care giving in order to be lucid enough to learn even more about this (possibly new) illness and decide on the best treatment plan?  And then I realized what a wonderful idea Dr. G. was presenting. Most caregivers are too devastated to be able to do “the job with all it involves” and perhaps would welcome the opportunity to, “stand aside and let the job be done by someone who is both willing and able” while keeping them very much in the decision making loop.

 

            I want to once again thank Dr. G. for his letter. His comments gave me new insights and different perceptions into the reality of the caregiver’s role. I want to applaud his candor and the courage of his perspective. I believe the insights he has given us can help us be more efficient as we help our spouses and understand the perspective and boundaries from the other side of the stethoscope.

 

            Some final comments next week.


 


You can contact me at annnovick@hotmail.com

About the Author:


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “A Response To Dr. G. (Part II)”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu.
Netanyahu to Release Frozen Palestinian Authority Tax Revenue
Latest Sections Stories
Neuman-Rabbi-M-Gary

Are we allowed to lie for shalom bayis? It would seem so, but what might be a healthy guideline for when it’s okay and when it’s not?

book-To-Fill-The-Sky-With-Stars

The connection between what I experienced as a high school teenager and the adult I am today did not come easy to me.

Respler-032715

Isn’t therapy about being yourself; aren’t there different ways for people to communicate with each other?

South-Florida-logo

Jack was awarded a blue and gold first-place trophy, appropriately topped off with a golden bee.

Participating in ManiCures during the school day may feel like a break from learning, but the intended message to the students was loud and clear. Learning and chesed come in all forms, and can be fun.

Building campaign chairman Jack Gluck has led the effort over many years.

When using an extension cord always make sure to use the correct rated extension cord.

There was no question that when Mrs. Cohen entered the room to meet the teacher she was hostile from the outset.

Szold was among the founders and leaders (she served on its executive committee) of Ichud (“Unity”), a political group that campaigned against the creation of an independent, sovereign Jewish state in Eretz Yisrael.

My friend is a strong and capable Jewish woman, but she acted with a passivity that seemed out of character.

“If you don’t stand straight, you’ll never get a husband.”

First, sit down with your helpers and a pen and paper and break the jobs down into small parts.

More Articles from Ann Novick

When one is blind one learns to use Braille to read. When one cannot walk, a wheelchair gives mobility. Sign language allows a mute person to speak and ocular implants assist in hearing when one is deaf. These are all compensatory strategies that help a person function despite his disability. But compensatory strategies are not just for physical problems. Understanding our psychological weaknesses and setting up our lives to ensure that we are not tempted to repeat our past mistakes, is as necessary as any aid to the disabled.

Well spouses have often discovered that their friends and relatives, despite their closeness to the situation, often don’t realize the tremendous emotional impact living with chronic illness has on the family. With the best intentions, suggestions, ideas and criticism are offered, based on the non-experience of those with healthy families. Even when the good intentioned get a taste of the difficulties, it is sometimes not enough for them to then identify and understand what the family of the chronically ill must face on a constant basis.

Over the past two weeks I have shared letters from a therapist and a well spouse. Both of the letters gave personal insights into the process of losing hope, how we react when that happens and some ways of coping when test scores, diagnosis and just simple repetitive behavior indicate that change for the better is impossible.

Dear Ann,

I’ve read your last few articles on psycho-neurological testing (Oct.8-22) with interest. As a therapist who has counseled couples dealing with chronic illness, I’d like to give you another perspective.

Dear Ann,

Your articles on the Neuro-Psychological Testing were right on (October 8-22). My husband underwent testing twice and your articles explained it things exactly the way they were. Besides the test, we also tried therapy.

Very often when we can’t face our big hurts or big loses we focus on the little ones. We can discuss those. We can cry over the small loses, be angry at the smaller hurts even though it may look trite and sound ridiculous to others.

Over the last two weeks we have been discussing one way in which well spouses can determine whether behavior displayed by their ill partners is caused by their illness or is a way they have chosen to act. We have focused on Psycho-Neurological testing, what it can tell us, as well as its pros and cons.

Last week I discussed a question that haunts many well spouses: not knowing if the difficult and often inappropriate behavior frequently displayed by their partners are caused by the disease and therefore not-controllable, or if the behavior is a choice the spouse makes and can therefore be changed. This doubt can be the source of much frustration and many marital disagreements. One way of alleviating this doubt is by having a psycho- neurological work up done. But that path is not so simple.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/sections/magazine/a-response-to-dr-g-part-ii/2009/09/02/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: