web analytics
September 3, 2014 / 8 Elul, 5774
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat (L) visits the JewishPress.com booth at The Event. And the Winners of the JewishPress.com Raffle Are…

Congratulations to all the winners of the JewishPress.com raffle at The Event



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Biden’s Bigotry On Jerusalem

What a disturbing sight to behold.
 
In the past few days, the Obama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths to berate Israel over the approval of a Jewish housing project in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo.
 
Angered by the timing of Israel’s move, which came during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden, a parade of senior American officials have done their utmost to publicly dress down the Netanyahu government.
 
Using terms such as “condemned” and “deeply negative,” Biden, along with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs and State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley all decided to pile on the Jewish state in the diplomatic equivalent of an angry mob pouncing on its prey.
 
Meanwhile, last Friday, Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg reportedly summoned Israeli Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren for a reprimand, which was followed by a 45-minute phone call from Clinton to Netanyahu.
 
Indeed, from the tone and the sheer number of responses, an uninformed observer could be forgiven for thinking Israel had committed some egregious, unpardonable sin against America, rather than simply deciding to move forward on a real estate project in its sovereign capital.
 
But perhaps the harshest response came from David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, who went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” to denounce the Israeli move.
 
Referring to Biden and Clinton’s reproof, Axelrod said, “Both the vice president and the secretary of state reflected the president’s thinking – this was an affront, an insult, but most importantly it undermined this very fragile effort to bring peace to this region. And” – he added somewhat ominously – “for this announcement to come at this time was very, very destructive.”
 
Did he say “destructive”? Who does Axelrod think he is kidding?
 
Consider the following.
 
On March 11, Palestinian terrorists in Gaza fired a rocket into southern Israel, marking the second time in the past four weeks they have carried out such an attack.
 
Thankfully, no one was injured in this latest assault, but neither Axelrod nor Clinton nor any other American officials saw fit to mention it, even though it is hard to think of anything more “destructive” than an explosive projectile hurled at civilian population centers.
 
And yet, when Israel decides to build some new apartments in an already-existing section of Jerusalem, Obama’s people suddenly find their voice?
 
But what was even more troubling about the administration’s response is that it lends credence to the discriminatory notion that certain places should be off-limits to Jews simply because they are Jews.
 
Vice President Biden himself was born in the city of Scranton. Ironically enough, just 90 miles south lies a town named New Jerusalem, Pennsylvania.
 
Were the vice president to suggest that the right of Jews to live and build in New Jerusalem, Pennsylvania, should be restricted in any way, he would immediately be denounced as a racist and an anti-Semite, and rightly so.
 
Yet when he suggests that Jews should not be permitted to build freely in Jerusalem, Israel because they are Jews, it is inexplicably accepted as being reasonable.
 
Call it what you will, but this opposition to Jewish housing construction in Jerusalem is nothing more than an archaic form of bigotry. You can’t post a “No Jews Allowed” sign, and expect us to view it any differently.
 
To suggest that Jews or any other ethnic group should not be allowed to live and build freely in a certain area because of who they are is something that went out of fashion in the United States back in the 1960s, and I can’t think of a good reason to begin applying it here in Jerusalem today.
 
Civil rights for Jews, like any universal human right, cannot be restricted in time or place. They must be applicable regardless of where a person chooses to live.
 
This is especially true when it comes to Jerusalem, the heart and soul of the Jewish people.
 
Our connection to the Holy City stretches back more than three millennia. Indeed, over 3,000 years before the PLO was founded, Jews were living, working and praying in Jerusalem.
 
Now, following in our ancestors’ footsteps, we have returned to reclaim what is rightfully ours.
 
So step aside, Mr. Biden, and please do not interfere.
 

Like it or not, nothing can stop this historical process from unfolding.

 

 

            Michael Freund, whose Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month, served as deputy director of Communications & Policy Planning in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office under Benjamin Netanyahu from 1996 to 1999. He is founder and chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), which reaches out and assists “lost Jews” seeking to return to the Jewish people.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Biden’s Bigotry On Jerusalem”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Hamas's leader in Gaza, Ismail Haniyeh (in blue shirt, center), benefitted politically - and in a dramatic fashion - from this summer's war.  Photo from Hamas victory rally, Aug. 27, 2014.
Gazan Deaths and Destruction Dramatically Drives Popularity for Hamas
Latest Indepth Stories
1347905461_5613_Mideast_Israel_Palestinians_Rosh_Hashana_05475

“these soldiers are on the front lines of a war that the entire world is fighting”

yesha1

Hayovel’s vision: to share with them (Jews) a passion for the soon coming jubilee in yeshua messiah.”

Tibets spiritual leader Dalai Lama.

Dalai Lama: In the interest of Tibetans today to have peaceful co-existence with the Chinese.

Hamas Quote on Death

However, 40+ countries still use capital punishment for a variety of offenses.

The War projects to lower Israel’s 2014 GDP 0.5% but will have little influence on foreign investors

It is in the nature of the Nations of the World to be hostile towards the Jewish People.

Hamas and Islamic Jihad are actually fighting to “liberate Jerusalem and all Palestine.”

The bad news is that ISIS and Al Qaeda are on the Syrian Golan. The good news is that every terrorist in Syria is killing each other.

The congregants, Ethiopians spanning generations, were beaming with joy and pride.

The withdrawal from the Gaza Strip nine years ago did not enhance Israel’s security.

How does a soldier from a religious home fall in love with a soldier from a non- religious kibbutz?

In 19th century entire ancient Jewish communities fled Palestine to escape brutal Muslim authorities

Responsibility lies with both the UN and Hamas, and better commitments should have been demanded from both parties in the ceasefire.

But the world is forever challenging our Jewish principle and our practices.

If this is how we play the game, we will lose. By that I mean we will lose everything.

More Articles from Jason Maoz
Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

Presidential-Seal-062014

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Readers who’ve stuck with the Monitor over the years will forgive this rerun of sorts, but as we approach the fortieth anniversary of the Yom Kippur War – and with the stench of presidential indecisiveness hanging so heavily over Washington these days – it seemed only appropriate to revisit Richard Nixon’s role in enabling Israel to recover from the staggering setbacks it suffered in the first week of fighting.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/bidens-bigotry-on-jerusalem/2010/03/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: