web analytics
October 2, 2014 / 8 Tishri, 5775
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

Biden’s Bigotry On Jerusalem

What a disturbing sight to behold.
 
In the past few days, the Obama administration has gone to extraordinary lengths to berate Israel over the approval of a Jewish housing project in the Jerusalem neighborhood of Ramat Shlomo.
 
Angered by the timing of Israel’s move, which came during a visit by Vice President Joe Biden, a parade of senior American officials have done their utmost to publicly dress down the Netanyahu government.
 
Using terms such as “condemned” and “deeply negative,” Biden, along with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs and State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley all decided to pile on the Jewish state in the diplomatic equivalent of an angry mob pouncing on its prey.
 
Meanwhile, last Friday, Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg reportedly summoned Israeli Ambassador to Washington Michael Oren for a reprimand, which was followed by a 45-minute phone call from Clinton to Netanyahu.
 
Indeed, from the tone and the sheer number of responses, an uninformed observer could be forgiven for thinking Israel had committed some egregious, unpardonable sin against America, rather than simply deciding to move forward on a real estate project in its sovereign capital.
 
But perhaps the harshest response came from David Axelrod, Obama’s senior adviser, who went on NBC’s “Meet the Press” to denounce the Israeli move.
 
Referring to Biden and Clinton’s reproof, Axelrod said, “Both the vice president and the secretary of state reflected the president’s thinking – this was an affront, an insult, but most importantly it undermined this very fragile effort to bring peace to this region. And” – he added somewhat ominously – “for this announcement to come at this time was very, very destructive.”
 
Did he say “destructive”? Who does Axelrod think he is kidding?
 
Consider the following.
 
On March 11, Palestinian terrorists in Gaza fired a rocket into southern Israel, marking the second time in the past four weeks they have carried out such an attack.
 
Thankfully, no one was injured in this latest assault, but neither Axelrod nor Clinton nor any other American officials saw fit to mention it, even though it is hard to think of anything more “destructive” than an explosive projectile hurled at civilian population centers.
 
And yet, when Israel decides to build some new apartments in an already-existing section of Jerusalem, Obama’s people suddenly find their voice?
 
But what was even more troubling about the administration’s response is that it lends credence to the discriminatory notion that certain places should be off-limits to Jews simply because they are Jews.
 
Vice President Biden himself was born in the city of Scranton. Ironically enough, just 90 miles south lies a town named New Jerusalem, Pennsylvania.
 
Were the vice president to suggest that the right of Jews to live and build in New Jerusalem, Pennsylvania, should be restricted in any way, he would immediately be denounced as a racist and an anti-Semite, and rightly so.
 
Yet when he suggests that Jews should not be permitted to build freely in Jerusalem, Israel because they are Jews, it is inexplicably accepted as being reasonable.
 
Call it what you will, but this opposition to Jewish housing construction in Jerusalem is nothing more than an archaic form of bigotry. You can’t post a “No Jews Allowed” sign, and expect us to view it any differently.
 
To suggest that Jews or any other ethnic group should not be allowed to live and build freely in a certain area because of who they are is something that went out of fashion in the United States back in the 1960s, and I can’t think of a good reason to begin applying it here in Jerusalem today.
 
Civil rights for Jews, like any universal human right, cannot be restricted in time or place. They must be applicable regardless of where a person chooses to live.
 
This is especially true when it comes to Jerusalem, the heart and soul of the Jewish people.
 
Our connection to the Holy City stretches back more than three millennia. Indeed, over 3,000 years before the PLO was founded, Jews were living, working and praying in Jerusalem.
 
Now, following in our ancestors’ footsteps, we have returned to reclaim what is rightfully ours.
 
So step aside, Mr. Biden, and please do not interfere.
 

Like it or not, nothing can stop this historical process from unfolding.

 

 

            Michael Freund, whose Jewish Press-exclusive column appears the third week of each month, served as deputy director of Communications & Policy Planning in the Israeli Prime Minister’s Office under Benjamin Netanyahu from 1996 to 1999. He is founder and chairman of Shavei Israel (www.shavei.org), which reaches out and assists “lost Jews” seeking to return to the Jewish people.

About the Author: Jason Maoz is the Senior Editor of The Jewish Press.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Biden’s Bigotry On Jerusalem”

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Car Smashed in A-Tur 2
4 Women Survive Near Lynch on Mount of Olives
Latest Indepth Stories
Ben Cohen

The coalition the US has assembled to fight ISIS is based on an immediate coincidence of interest.

Jews out of Silwan!

Would Obama stand for a housing policy that barred blacks from living in Washington, DC?

Jonah and the Whale (2012) 23 x 23, bronze relief by Lynda Caspe.

God will accept repentance, even if it is mostly for ulterior motives and likely not to last.

Mostofsky-100314

if her son remained non-responsive she would place honey on his lips on Rosh Hashanah so that he might realize it was the chag.

Soldiers at various hospitals complained that they experienced hostility from Arab hospital staff.

“We have succeeded in raising an ideological generation that loves death like our enemies love life”

There is not even a hint of recognition that Hamas deliberately fires rockets at civilian targets in Israel while storing arms and rocket launchers among its own civilians in Gaza.

No one with any sanity would dream of rationalizing or justifying the depredations perpetrated on the Arab world by ISIS.

With $2 billion on hand the Islamic State is an extremely well-funded terrorist group that may pose a major international crisis for the U.S. and the world. Learn about their rise to power and the toll they’ve taken thus far.

In the recent Gaza war and its aftermath, we saw a totally illogical reaction from the world.

A., a teacher: “I do not know a single Gazan who is pro-Hamas at the moment, except for those on its payroll.”

Is the global community clear in its response to these extremist groups?

Like our fabled character, Don Quixote, President Obama has constantly spawned his own reality.

Boroujerdi was informed that “the pressures and tortures will increase until he has been destroyed.”

More Articles from Jason Maoz
William Safire

“It’s a lousy column and a dishonest one,” Halberstam wrote. “So close it. Or you will end up just as shabby as Safire.”

Charles Krauthammer

Wye would be seen to have set the groundwork for the creation of a Palestinian state

These are not necessarily the best all-around biographies or studies of the individual presidents listed (though some rank right up there), but the strongest in terms of exploring presidential attitudes and policies toward Israel.

The Clintonan “engagement” liberals remember with such fondness did nothing but embolden Arafat and Hamas and Hizbullah as they witnessed Israel’s only real ally elevate process ahead of policy.

What really makes one wonder about the affinity felt by certain Jews for Grant was the welcome mat he put out for some of the country’s most pernicious anti-Semites.

With 2013 marking half a century since Kennedy’s fateful limousine ride in Dallas, the current revels are exceeding the revisionist frenzies of years past, with a seemingly endless parade of books, articles and television specials designed to assure us that, despite everything that has come to light about him since his death, JFK was a great president, or at least a very good president who would have been great had his life not been so cruelly cut short.

As someone who for the past fifteen years has been writing a column that largely focuses on the news media, I’ve read what is no doubt an altogether unhealthy number of books on the subject. Most of them were instantly forgettable while some created a brief buzz but failed to pass the test of time. And then there were those select few that merited a permanent spot on the bookshelf.

George W. Bush has been getting some positive media coverage lately, with recent polls showing him at least as popular as his successor, Barack Obama, and a big new book about the Bush presidency by New York Times chief White House correspondent Peter Baker (Days of Fire, Doubleday) portraying Bush as a much more hands-on chief executive than his detractors ever imagined.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/bidens-bigotry-on-jerusalem/2010/03/17/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: