Photo Credit: Moshe Feiglin
Moshe Feiglin

“Pushovers don’t die, they are simply replaced by new pushovers,” says the Israeli adage. But in Israel’s Right, the pushovers don’t die and they aren’t even replaced by new pushovers. The Right always celebrates its political victory and in the blink of an eye, its leaders become tools in the hands of the Left.

Begin surrendered the entire Sinai Peninsula to Egypt and destroyed Yamit and an entire settlement bloc. Shamir sent Israel to sit in rooms with plastic covered windows and doors, waiting for the Iraqi missiles to explode (and leaving the state’s security, for the first time in Israel’s history, in the hands of the U.S.). Netanyahu hugged Arafat and gave him almost all of Hebron. Sharon destroyed Gush Katif. And now Lieberman is already making more leftist declarations than his predecessor in the Defense Ministry.

Advertisement

What’s wrong with the Right? Why is it that when the Left is in power, it rules and leads the nation according to its principles, while when the Right is in power, the Left continues to rule and lead according to its principles? And it rules by means of the elected officials of the Right, with virtually no opposition. Why does that happen time and again?

Usually, the Right attempts to answer this question on the basis of faulty character traits: “Begin was weak, Netanyahu is spineless, Sharon was always a leftist, and Lieberman is simply corrupt…” But that is ridiculous. Every leader has his strong and weak points. The Right’s leaders are no less worthy than the leaders of the Left. On the contrary, they are generally more talented. The answer does not lie with their character. It goes much deeper:

The Israeli Right does not really have an alternative agenda to the Left. The distinction between Right and Left does not revolve around questions of peace and security; it revolves around the question of identity: Is Israel a Jewish State or a state of all its citizens?

Zionism built Israel as a state of all its citizens. The Knesset (with the exception of the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee) is the Knesset of the state of all its citizens. The IDF is the army of all its citizens (at least all those citizens who are not considered “Nazis”…). The media are the media of the state of all its citizens. The justice system, academia, culture – all are part of an Israel that is a state of all its citizens. And so, when the Left rises to power – it is “all systems go” for the political actualization of the state of all its citizens principle.

And the Right? The Right has never attempted to formulate a policy that revolves around the Jewish identity of the State of Israel.

After Defense Minister Lieberman destroys Amona, releases terrorists, opens roadblocks and freezes construction in Judea and Samaria, Israel will go to elections. At that point, he (and the rest of the Right) will issue some belligerent declarations about the Arabs and will once again rake in the votes of the pushovers who never die and never need to be replaced.

To change the entire paradigm and bring true peace and security to Israel, our state must connect first and foremost to its Jewish identity and identify itself as a unique, liberty-based Jewish state.

Advertisement

3 COMMENTS

  1. Without defining who a Jew is Feiglin's comments are fuzzy whines. Pretending that if Israel was really Jewish all would be right misses the mark. Israel should be a state of all its citizens, but those who regard the majority i.e. Jews, as the enemy and feel kinship to Israel's enemies should lose their citizenship. As well, if the party that wins election fails to rule, it abandons its electorate; the High Court, the military and the police must be depoliticised andhostile NGOs must be defanged. And finally, leaders of all political persuations must become patriotic and rule in the interests of Israel, which means telling cynical international meddlers to get lost.

Comments are closed.

Loading Facebook Comments ...