web analytics
May 19, 2013 /10 Sivan, 5773
At a Glance
InDepth
Sponsored Post
jumping Following a Passion for Sports to Israel

In Israel, a new five month scholarship program being offered to young aspiring athletes – one of them could be you.



Home » InDepth » Columns »

The Justice/Security Connection

tell a friend

      If the ideas put forward at the recent Herzliya Conference are any indication, both the classic Right and religious Right are captive to the Oslo paradigm and the consciousness that produced it. Neither has any alternative to the proposals of the Ehud (Olmert) & Ehud (Barak) government.

 

      From Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech, it seemed that he had memorized Shimon Peres’s book, The New Middle East, before ascending to the speaker’s podium. Netanyahu spoke of joint industrial parks to help the Gazans become wealthy and extinguish their desire to fight. The catch is that this solution has already been tried. The abandoned industrial parks in Atarot and the Erez Crossing, both refurbished to fulfill Peres’s dream, should be sufficient proof that joint economic ventures are not the solution.

 

      Since Oslo’s inception, the Left has taunted the Right with the fact that it has no non-Oslo alternative. Foreign Minster Peres’s pointed question to Opposition head Netanyahu during the Knesset’s Oslo debate, “And what is your alternative?” made clear from the very start that the classic Right had no answer to Oslo. Netanyahu’s speech at the Herzliya Conference simply highlighted that fact. Is it any wonder that when the Right rises to power in Israel, it is still the Left that actually rules?

 

      But why should we complain about Netanyahu? The religious Right is also captive to the consciousness of the Left. “We must safeguard Nasrallah as the leader of Hizbullah and not attempt to eliminate him,” religious-rightist General Yaakov Amidror said at the Herzliya Conference.

 

      When Yasir Arafat was on his deathbed, I published an article entitled, “Quick! Kill Him Before He Dies!” On the surface, the call to kill the admired arch-terrorist when he was about to die anyway was patently illogical. Why should Israel set itself up for a violent Arab reaction when the contemptible scum was about to do the world a favor and make his exit on his own?

 

      The answer is simple. There is an intrinsic bond between justice and security. True, a good army, modern weapons and sophisticated intelligence are all prerequisites for security. But nothing will help a country that is not armed with justice. When Israel signed the Oslo Accords, it signed away its most vital armament. Rabin’s White House lawn handshake with the head of the Palestine (all of it) Liberation (from all the Jews) Organization was an announcement by Israel that it accepts the justice of the Arab claim on the entire Land of Israel. Oslo relegated Israel to the role of Jewish colonialists who want nothing more from the “native” Palestinians than to do a little business.

 

      My call to eliminate Arafat did not stem from pragmatic considerations. It was a desperate attempt to restore Israel’s sense of justice. I didn’t think that we should kill him because it would effectively stop terror in the short term. I called to kill him because that was the just thing to do.

 

      The Oslo pragmatism that surrenders the concept of justice from the outset has wreaked havoc on Israel’s security. Today, it is in the worst state that it has been since the War of Independence. Israel’s civilian population has become a legitimate target for daily shelling. Post-Oslo Israel has allowed the Arabs to arm themselves with tens of thousands of missiles, covering all of Israel with conventional and non-conventional ballistic weapons. In just a short time, Iran will complete the development of the icing on the cake. But an Israel that lacks faith in its own justice is incapable of explaining to the parents of its soldiers why it must go to war to eliminate the existential threat. It will clearly not gain world support to attack Iran – because Israel has already admitted that there is no real justification for its own existence.

 

      Maybe those Israeli leaders who are detached from their Jewish identity no longer view justice as an absolute value. They may consider it a primitive artifact of times past, irrelevant to the post-modern era. “We will give them honor and they will give us peace,” Peres and his Oslo cohorts repeated time and again. From those who want no connection to their Jewish identity, maybe that’s all we can expect. But when the religious Right repeats the Oslo mantras, all of our early-warning systems should be blinking. More than anything else, such statements proclaim Israel’s desperate need for authentic Jewish leadership that is confident in the justice of the Jewish nation in the Land of Israel.

 

      (Translated from the article that appeared in the Makor Rishon newspaper.)

 

      To learn more about Moshe Feiglin and Manhigut Yehudit (Jewish Leadership), and their plan for Israel’s future – and to order Feiglin’s newest book, The War of Dreams- visit http://www.jewishisrael.org.

tell a friend

About the Author:


You might also be interested in:


no comments

You must log in to post a comment.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Jamal al-Dura and his 12-year-old son Muhammad under fire
Israel Explodes the ‘Big Lie’ – Gaza Al Dura Boy Wasn’t Killed
Latest Indepth Stories
Japanese Muslim

The Japanese do not feel the need to apologize to Muslims for the negative way in which they relate to Islam.

Portugal's national soccer team coach Luiz Felipe Scolari with young Israeli and Palestinian soccer players, June, 2007

Palestinian youths from Hebron, though, who met with Israelis near Bethlehem to share their problems and insights have been forced to issue a statement distancing themselves from the meeting.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton testifying about the September, 2012 attack in Benghazi, Libya.

Benghazi isn’t likely to keep Hillary out of the Democratic field in 2016, but after 2008, she is justifiably paranoid.

Housing and Construction Minister Uri Ariel.

The contractors received the land at a bargain basement price, moved the prices up to 1.8 million NIS and pocketed one million NIS per apartment.

Many of my fellow college students are quick to voice their acceptance of their LGBT friends, but they turn up their noses and frown slightly when they speak of a Hasid.

The growing revelations that the Obama State Department watered down public statements on the attack in order to cleanse them of any mention of al Qaeda and terrorism is a travesty.

We must confront Islamist groups with what Prime Minister David Cameron referred to as “muscular liberalism.”

Al-Qaradawi’s visit and statements also serve as a reminder that the Israeli-Arab conflict is centered, more than ever, around religion.

Everyone who reads newspapers should know at least one thing. Threats to annihilate Israel have always been unremarkable. Almost never, it seems, have Israel’s existential enemies sought any reason for concealment.

Mark Treyger, a candidate for city council in New York City’s 47th council district, met recently with the editorial board of The Jewish Press at the newspaper’s Boro Park office.

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

Last Friday, the Western Wall underwent an unwelcome transformation from sacred site to media circus as the group known as the Women of the Wall sought to hold a decidedly non-traditional prayer service.

Two recent revelations have raised serious questions about the kind of government President Obama is running.

Readers of my monthly Baseball Insider column may have noticed its absence last week (the column appears in the second issue of every month). The reason for that is I have something more serious and personal to share with you, something that didn’t seem appropriate for a baseball column.

More Articles from Moshe Feiglin
Moshe-Feiglin-022213

Israel’s government did not want to liberate Jerusalem. Or to be more specific, the Labor and National Religious Party ministers did not want to liberate Jerusalem. “Who needs that whole Vatican?” Defense Minister Moshe Dayan explained at the time.

Member of Knesset Moshe Feiglin (Likud).

Netanyahu made an invaluable turnabout in the way Israel explains itself. We must complete that turnabout. We must not go half way.

The following is my response to a woman who criticized me for visiting the Temple Mount. In a letter to me, she claimed that I broke the law and irresponsibly provoked Arab anger. She suggested that my actions should conform to the will of the “majority.”

It is always easiest to blame the rest of the world and not to make an accounting of your own ideology.

Why throw years of friendly cooperation into the trashcan?

The struggle for Israeli sovereignty on the Temple Mount symbolizes humanity’s struggle in the transition from enslavement to liberty.

Do you really think that retreat from the very foundations of our lives will bring us quiet?

It is unthinkable that Israelis should look at Jonathan through American eyes.

    Latest Poll

    Which is the most beautiful location in Jerusalem?









    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/columns/the-justicesecurity-connection/2008/02/20/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online:

Close