Fourteen injured youths surrounded by dozens of Arabs throwing rocks at them and beating them with sticks. Four hundred meters away, three other youths who didn’t make it, also surrounded by dozens of Arabs, also being pelted with rocks. One faints. The commander of a hundred-strong force of the IDF looks on.
The Jewish youths who were beaten by Palestinians with sticks said they had no intention of performing a “price-tag” revenge attack. “If we’d meant to do that,” they noted, “we’d have had to be idiots to do it in broad daylight.” A military source with the Judea and Samaria Division admitted to me that there was no proof the youths had had any intention of spraying graffiti or burning cars.
Still, he rejected the youths’ argument that they had only been hiking in the area.
“If someone goes for a hike right after his vineyard is destroyed, or goes for a hike by the local villages an hour after a confrontation with the neighboring village—that’s a ‘price tag,’ too.”
“Wait,” I said. “What were the Palestinians doing coming down from their village to the Eish Kodesh outpost just when IDF tractors were uprooting the Jewish residents’ saplings? Why didn’t the Border Police kick them out when they came to dance and make merry over what was being done to their Jewish neighbors? The Jewish youths had saved their pennies just to buy those saplings—why did they let the Palestinians come celebrate and take some of those saplings for themselves?”
Notes one of the youths: “Gush Emunim and the settlement movement held a lot of parades and hikes that were meant to demonstrate their presence in the territories. We grew up on those. Walking through the Land of Israel means fulfilling the mitzva of conquering the land: that’s the proper response, the best way to correct being expelled from that place. We said, let’s show that we’re walking through the land and conquering it.”
What they did might perhaps be labeled as venting anger, or even a provocation: the youths staged a provocation by pointedly moving around near the villages after the Arabs of Qusra came to their community to celebrate the downfall of the young agriculturists, who had established themselves on the tough earth of the Judean Mountains and planted trees there, only to be uprooted by the IDF.
Palestinians regularly infiltrate Jewish areas. To provoke. To steal. Sometimes to kill. But the Jews don’t react violently. Normally, the Arabs come on Shabbat or Shabbat eve with leftist organizations and foreign volunteers. They come right up to a community, right up to the fence. Absent a fence, they came right up to the houses at the community’s perimeter.
But the residents don’t attack them. They leave the trespassers to the guards on duty and the community’s chief of security.
The message from the recent episode is clear: violence pays.
But what will become of the hot-tempered youths, who see the legal system buckling under Palestinian violence? The youths see that the government is looking for dialogue and compromise instead of laying down the law. They see that in the Jewish–Arab conflict over the land, he who uses violence captures the land and can even defeat the legal system.
Some time ago, three Jewish youths with clubs drove away several Palestinians who had entered the space adjacent to a community in the South Hevron Hills. The young Jews were photographed, arrested, and put on trial. There too, the message was clear. And since then, even within the Green Line, along the seam running through Jerusalem, you don’t see young Jews putting up a defense against Arab rioters who come to French Hill and the Hebrew University campus on Mount Scopus.
Where was the Israeli army? It took time to arrive. And when it did arrive, the Palestinian lynch continued as an IDF regiment commander and his soldiers looked on. Those attacked testify that the IDF—the Israel Defense Forces—acted like a United Nations force.
Well, not quite. The IDF force followed its orders for containing security events, in accordance with the policies of the general presently heading Central Command. This is why it didn’t employ riot-dispersion methods even when the youths’ lives were in danger.
This isn’t to say that the commanders were doing nothing. They spent the entire time negotiating with the local police and village elders. Photographs of the event show that the regiment commander didn’t take charge of the area, didn’t announce it a closed military zone, and didn’t rescue the youths under attack. He just helped the Palestinians remove those who were wounded.
The youths report: It was a charade. The eye-catching man in a suit is a Palestinian policeman who previously had thrown rocks at them with the others. The same goes for some of the photographers wearing vests with photographers’ markings. Even the Palestinians in Red Cross vests had joined in the attack on them. Then the Palestinian police put up a defense just outside the outer ring of youths. They didn’t bother stopping the attack—they just asserted control of the event.
I’ve since asked commanders in Judea and Samaria: Doesn’t it concern you that the IDF is showing no ability to take control? Doesn’t this hurt deterrence?
This is not the army that my friends and I once knew.Meir Indor
About the Author: Lt.-Col. (ret.) Meir Indor is CEO of Almagor Terror Victims Association. In his extended career of public service, he has worked as a journalist, founded the Libi Fund, Sar-El, Habaita, among many other initiatives, and continues to lend his support to other pressing causes of the day.
If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.
Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.
If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.