web analytics
March 6, 2015 / 15 Adar , 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Unintended

Business-Halacha-logo

Aharon and Yosef were cleaning up the shul three days after Pesach. They were sorting all the siddurim and chumashim that had been returned helter-skelter to the bookcases.

As Aharon picked up one Chumash, he noticed it looked unusual. He showed it to Yosef and said, “There’s no shul stamp on this Chumash. Where should we put it?”

Yosef took the Chumash and looked it over. “The shul does not own any chumashim like this,” he said definitively. “Someone must have left it here over Pesach.”

He flipped through the pages, looking for some identification. “Absolutely no marks; it’s brand new,” Yosef said. “Since there are no identifying marks, the item is hefker [ownerless] and can be taken; I’m taking it for myself.”

“What do you mean you’re keeping it for yourself?” said Aharon. “I picked it up first! If it has no identification and is hefker – then it’s mine.”

“Why should it be yours?” said Yosef. “You gave it to me.”

“I never gave it to you to keep; I just handed it to you,” replied Aharon. “I thought it was owned by the shul. But if it’s ownerless – I found it and I picked it up first.”

“You didn’t find it at all,” said Yosef. “You just picked it up to put it away in its proper place.”

“Bottom line, I picked up the Chumash first, though,” replied Aharon. “That’s enough to make it mine, not yours.”

“I don’t think so,” said Yosef. “You need intention to acquire it.”

“Let’s ask Rabbi Dayan,” Aharon suggested.

The two came before Rabbi Dayan. “I picked up a Chumash thinking it was the shul’s and passed it to Yosef,” said Aharon. “It turns out the Chumash has no identification, so Yosef wants to take it. Whom does the Chumash belong to?”

The Chumash belongs to Yosef,” ruled Rabbi Dayan. “Although Aharon picked it up first, he had no intention of acquiring the Chumash when he did so. Therefore, the Chumash remains hefker and Yosef acquired it.”

“Do you really need intention in order to acquire something?” asked Aharon. “I remember a discussion in the Gemara about falling on a lost item…”

“There are some seemingly contradictory sources,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “On the one hand, the Gemara [Yevamos 52b] states clearly that if one digs in an ownerless field [which belonged to a convert who died without heirs] but mistakenly thought the field was his own, he does not acquire it. Although digging is an appropriate means of acquiring an ownerless field, since the person thought the field was his own, he had no intention to acquire it.” (C.M. 275:24-25)

“On the other hand,” continued Rabbi Dayan, “the Gemara [B.M. 10a-b] has two opinions regarding a person who fell on a metziah to acquire it. The act of falling is not a valid means of acquisition, but the Sages instituted that whoever first approaches a metziah within 4 cubits in a semi-public area, acquires it through his proximity. The Rama rules that the person acquires who fell on the item acquires it through his proximity, despite the fact that he mistakenly intended to acquire it through falling, not through proximity.” (Rama C.M. 268:1)

“How do we resolve these contradictory sources?” asked Yosef.

Mishneh Lamelech explains that in the second case, where the person fell on the metziah, at least he intended to acquire it at that time, in one manner or another,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The particular manner of acquisition is less relevant. However, in the first case, where the person dug in ownerless land, he had no intention at all to acquire the field.” (Pischei Teshuvah C.M. 198:9)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Unintended”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
A snow storm with freezing rain struck the New York area, turning the roads and runways into skating rinks.
Delta Plane Crash, Snowstorm Paralyze LaGuardia Airport in NYC
Latest Judaism Stories
Rebbetzin Esther Jungreis

To the glee of all Israel haters it was Netanyahu who was accused of endangering US-Israel relations

Ki Tisa_lecture

Over and over, the text tells us about “keeping” Shabbat, about holiness, and a covenant – but why?

Aaron and  The Golden Calf by James Tissot

Aharon’s guilt with the golden calf is not clear-cut. What if Moshe were in his brother’s place?

Rabbi Sacks

The Sabbath is a full dress rehearsal for an ideal society that has not yet come to pass-but will

When Hashem told Moshe of the option to destroy the people and make him and his descendants into a great nation, Hashem was telling Moshe that it is up to him.

Just like Moses and Aaron, Mordechai decides to ruin the party…

An Auto Accident
‘All Agree That They Are Exempt’
(Kesubbos 35a)

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

Why would the exemption of women from donating the half shekel exempt them from davening Musaf?

This concept should be very relevant to us as we, too, should be happy beyond description.

The Holocaust was the latest attempt of Amalek to destroy the special bond that we enjoy with God.

One can drink up to the Talmud’s criterion to confuse Mordechai and Haman-but not beyond.

“The voice is the voice of Yaakov, but the hands are the hands of Esav” gives great insight to Purim

Purim is the battleground of extremes, Amalek and Yisrael, with Zoroastrian Persia in between.

One should not give the money before Purim morning or after sunset.

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

Business-Halacha-logo

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

“I don’t accept this,” said Mr. Zummer. “I want you to finish! You’re not allowed to just stop in the middle!”

“That’s what you’re wondering?” laughed Mr. Rubin. “That ring is not mine at all. A relative gave me money to buy it for him.”

“How could you have expected my glasses to be there?” argued Mr. Weiss. “You shouldn’t have to pay.”

“It means that the disqualification of relatives as witnesses is a procedural issue, not a question of honesty,” explained Rabbi Dayan.

“The issue is not just logistical,” replied Mr. Kahn. “I thought that halacha requires that the beginning of the adjudication and acceptance of testimony be during daytime.” (C.M. 5:2; 28:24)

A few days, Mrs. Feldman called back. “I would prefer a nice cake rather than the chocolate.”

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/unintended/2014/05/01/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: