web analytics
April 21, 2015 / 2 Iyar, 5775
At a Glance
Judaism
Sponsored Post


Unintended

Business-Halacha-logo

Aharon and Yosef were cleaning up the shul three days after Pesach. They were sorting all the siddurim and chumashim that had been returned helter-skelter to the bookcases.

As Aharon picked up one Chumash, he noticed it looked unusual. He showed it to Yosef and said, “There’s no shul stamp on this Chumash. Where should we put it?”

Yosef took the Chumash and looked it over. “The shul does not own any chumashim like this,” he said definitively. “Someone must have left it here over Pesach.”

He flipped through the pages, looking for some identification. “Absolutely no marks; it’s brand new,” Yosef said. “Since there are no identifying marks, the item is hefker [ownerless] and can be taken; I’m taking it for myself.”

“What do you mean you’re keeping it for yourself?” said Aharon. “I picked it up first! If it has no identification and is hefker – then it’s mine.”

“Why should it be yours?” said Yosef. “You gave it to me.”

“I never gave it to you to keep; I just handed it to you,” replied Aharon. “I thought it was owned by the shul. But if it’s ownerless – I found it and I picked it up first.”

“You didn’t find it at all,” said Yosef. “You just picked it up to put it away in its proper place.”

“Bottom line, I picked up the Chumash first, though,” replied Aharon. “That’s enough to make it mine, not yours.”

“I don’t think so,” said Yosef. “You need intention to acquire it.”

“Let’s ask Rabbi Dayan,” Aharon suggested.

The two came before Rabbi Dayan. “I picked up a Chumash thinking it was the shul’s and passed it to Yosef,” said Aharon. “It turns out the Chumash has no identification, so Yosef wants to take it. Whom does the Chumash belong to?”

The Chumash belongs to Yosef,” ruled Rabbi Dayan. “Although Aharon picked it up first, he had no intention of acquiring the Chumash when he did so. Therefore, the Chumash remains hefker and Yosef acquired it.”

“Do you really need intention in order to acquire something?” asked Aharon. “I remember a discussion in the Gemara about falling on a lost item…”

“There are some seemingly contradictory sources,” answered Rabbi Dayan. “On the one hand, the Gemara [Yevamos 52b] states clearly that if one digs in an ownerless field [which belonged to a convert who died without heirs] but mistakenly thought the field was his own, he does not acquire it. Although digging is an appropriate means of acquiring an ownerless field, since the person thought the field was his own, he had no intention to acquire it.” (C.M. 275:24-25)

“On the other hand,” continued Rabbi Dayan, “the Gemara [B.M. 10a-b] has two opinions regarding a person who fell on a metziah to acquire it. The act of falling is not a valid means of acquisition, but the Sages instituted that whoever first approaches a metziah within 4 cubits in a semi-public area, acquires it through his proximity. The Rama rules that the person acquires who fell on the item acquires it through his proximity, despite the fact that he mistakenly intended to acquire it through falling, not through proximity.” (Rama C.M. 268:1)

“How do we resolve these contradictory sources?” asked Yosef.

Mishneh Lamelech explains that in the second case, where the person fell on the metziah, at least he intended to acquire it at that time, in one manner or another,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “The particular manner of acquisition is less relevant. However, in the first case, where the person dug in ownerless land, he had no intention at all to acquire the field.” (Pischei Teshuvah C.M. 198:9)

About the Author: Rabbi Meir Orlian is a faculty member of the Business Halacha Institute, headed by HaRav Chaim Kohn, a noted dayan. To receive BHI’s free newsletter, Business Weekly, send an e-mail to subscribe@businesshalacha.com. For questions regarding business halacha issues, or to bring a BHI lecturer to your business or shul, call the confidential hotline at 877-845-8455 or e-mail ask@businesshalacha.com.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

No Responses to “Unintended”

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
Rav Aharon Lichtenstein
My Encounter with Rav Lichtenstein
Latest Judaism Stories
Torah scroll. (illustrative only)

For humans, reducing flesh is generally a good thing whereas its expansion is generally a bad thing

Hertzberg-041715

Lincoln was not a perfect man. But he rose above his imperfections to do what he thought was right not matter the obstacles.

Arch of Titus

Adon Olam: An Erev Shabbat Musical Interlude Courtesy of David Herman

Daf-Yomi-logo

Oh My, It’s Copper!
‘…And One Who Is A Coppersmith’
(Kethubboth 77a)

The omer sacrifice of loose barley flour was more fitting for animal consumption than human consumption and symbolizes the depths to which the Jewish slaves had sunk.

Question: If Abraham was commanded to circumcise his descendants on the eighth day, why do Arabs – who claim to descend from Abraham through Yishmael – wait until their children are 13 to circumcise them? I am aware that this is a matter of little consequence to our people. Nevertheless, this inconsistency is one that piques my curiosity.

M. Goldman
(Via E-mail)

When Chazal call not eating treif food a chok, that refers to how it functions.

His mother called “Yoni, Yoni!” Her eyes, a moment earlier dark with pain, shone with joy and hope

Kashrut reminds us that in the end, God is the arbiter of right and wrong.

In a cab with Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach & Rav Elayshiv discussing if/when to say tefillas haderech

The successful student listens more than speaks out; wants his ideas critiqued, not just appreciated

Why would it not be sufficient to simply state lehoros from which we derive that in such a state one may not issue any psak?

What do we learn about overcoming loss from the argument between Moses and Aaron’s remaining 2 sons?

Each of the unique roles attributed to Moshe share the common theme that they require of and grant higher sanctity to the individual filling the role.

Because of the way the piece of my finger had been severed, the doctors at the hospital were not able to reattach it. They told me I’d have to see a specialist.

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

More Articles from Rabbi Meir Orlian
Business-Halacha-logo

“The problem is that the sum total is listed is $17,000. However, when you add the sums mentioned, it is clear that the total of $17,000 is an error. Thus, Mr. Broyer owes me $18,000, not $17,000.”

Business-Halacha-logo

“The guiding principle regarding work terms is: hakol keminhag hamidina – everything in accordance with the common practice,” replied Rabbi Dayan.

“No, I can’t take more than $65,” protested Mrs. Fleisher. “You may not owe me more than that.”

“If I notify people, nobody will buy the matzos!” exclaimed Mr. Mandel. “Once the halachic advisory panel ruled leniently, why can’t I sell the matzos regularly?”

“Do we have to donate again?” some people asked. “Is it fair that we should have to pay twice?”

“This sounds like a question for Rabbi Dayan,” said Mr. Cohen. He took out his cell phone and called Rabbi Dayan.

“We really appreciate your efforts in straightening the shul,” said Mr. Reiss. “How is it going?”

“Halacha differentiates between giving a gift, forgoing a debt [mechila], and granting permission to take something,” answered Rabbi Dayan.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/judaism/halacha-hashkafa/unintended/2014/05/01/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: