web analytics
November 1, 2014 / 8 Heshvan, 5775
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post
Meir Panim with Soldiers 5774 Roundup: Year of Relief and Service for Israel’s Needy

Meir Panim implements programs that serve Israel’s neediest populations with respect and dignity. Meir Panim also coordinated care packages for families in the South during the Gaza War.



J Street Activists Defame Former IDF Spokesperson

They were disruptive and rude, after arriving more than an hour into the event.
Former IDF Spokesperson Captain Barak Raz was rudely heckled by J Street U activists, who showed up late, did not understand his talk and accused him of lying. Embarrassing…

Former IDF Spokesperson Captain Barak Raz was rudely heckled by J Street U activists, who showed up late, did not understand his talk and accused him of lying. Embarrassing…

After seeing an op-ed headlined, “The Pro-Israel Tent ‘Doesn’t Matter If It Can’t Hold Disagreement,” written by my Brandeis classmates Eli Philip and Catie Stewart which appeared in a Philadelphia Jewish paper and several J Street online sources, I feel compelled to provide much needed additional information and context, so that readers can determine for themselves what is the matter, if anything, with our – and others – pro-Israel tent.

In their article, Philip and Stewart describe an incident that occurred at a pro-Israel event on campus earlier in the semester, during which Captain Barak Raz, a former spokesperson for the Israel Defense Forces, spoke.

In their op-ed, the two J Street U leaders state that Raz said there were no checkpoints in the West Bank, and that a J Street U leader asked Raz about a particular checkpoint, “motivated by deep frustration, the question was not asked calmly.”

What was not included in that op-ed is that the J Street U leader asking the question was Eli Philip, and that Philip and his J Street U colleagues were not just “not calm,” they were repeatedly disruptive and rude.  But even more importantly, at least as a matter of honesty, is that Philip arrived more than an hour after Raz’s talk began.  He missed entirely the groundwork of information already laid by Raz, which was the prelude to the statement Philip found so offensive.

But, actually, it’s worse than that. Because after Philip and his colleagues were so disruptive during Raz’s talk that there were calls for him to resign his student leadership position for having embarrassed the Brandeis community, Philip took to Facebook to announce what he called Captain Raz’s “lies” to the Brandeis community.

He wrote: Last night, at A Conversation with IDF Spokesperson Barak Raz, Barak Raz told over forty students, including former and current IDF soldiers, that ‘There are no checkpoints in the West Bank.’ For the IDF Spokesperson‘s knowledge, and for those in attendance who were lied to, here is the list of the checkpoints within the West Bank today,” which was accompanied by a link that did not work.

A conversation ensued, which included a response from Captain Raz himself:

Eli – I regret that you chose to ignore something critical. That you walked in, over an hour late, and aside from the disruptive chatter, missed the points that were made. Of the 44 checkpoints that divided the West Bank and prevented free traffic between Palestinian cities that once existed, essentially none are left (Hebron is a different story). What you have are ten positions, which remain, although their purpose and raison-d’être is completely different and they operate according to a different concept. They are better likened to forward positions that can look for a vehicle when AND IF there is related intelligence. Should you desire to continue this conversation, it’s probably best done in a way that reflects a little more integrity. I’m surprised that while you came to learn and listen, you refused to do that. Not that you need to be convinced, but the behavior you displayed was quite sub-par. I hope that with future speakers, you arrive in the beginning, so that everything that’s said on the end, isn’t out of context.”

When Philip was asked to apologize for his rudeness to a visitor brought to campus by several student groups, he refused. In fact, he said that Raz should apologize to him.

Contrary to Philip and Stewart’s suggestion that, “Some students targeted J Street U, pressuring us to keep our disagreements with the rest of the community private and to refrain from having conversations that challenge opposing viewpoints,” this was not the case at all.

What Philip and Stewart continually overlook is the fact that the outrage had nothing to do with J Street U Brandeis’s opinions. For some reason, the constant refrain when Philip and his colleagues are criticized for their conduct, they retreat into a victimized viewpoint crouch.

Most people in 21st Century America know that the unpopular position on campuses is not the one that is harshly critical of Israel, it is the one that is overtly pro-Israel.  There are far more J Street U, Students for Justice in Palestine and Breaking the Silence type events on campuses.  Indeed, there are no anti-terrorism annual events, although there are yearly, widespread week-long anti-Israel events on many campuses, including at Brandeis.

Personally, and openly, I and other pro-Israel students disagree with how they approach the Arab-Israeli conflict. Nonetheless, the issue for the Brandeis community was about respect.

Philip’s and Stewart’s continued focus on their “commitment to hearing and engaging these voices, even when they talk about things that are uncomfortable or challenging for us to hear” again misses the point. The issue was how they voiced their concerns, not the concerns themselves. They should be able to share their opinions. They need to be able to so. Silencing their voice would be morally unacceptable.

Philip and Stewart propose that the campus pro-Israel tent adhere to acceptance of different opinions. “The tent is held up not only by the acceptance of different opinions, but by a commitment to hearing and engaging these voices, even when they talk about things that are uncomfortable or challenging for us to hear.”

But a real, meaningful pro-anything tent is built not only by what Philip and Stewart seek.  The tent can only stand if it is grounded on facts and honesty. Sadly, based on the actions of J Street U Brandeis, they and their organization does not fit into their own model of a pro-Israel tent.

There are J Street core principles which do support what all of us are seeking. In fact, J Street’s 4th core principle asserts the idea that “vibrant but respectful debate about Israel benefits the American Jewish community and Israel.”

But so long as Philip and Stewart and the others at J Street U Brandeis fail to understand that it is not their voices and views that are minimized and feel muted, their antics will continue to lead them out from under the tentflaps.  So long as they are the ones creating polarization, they will and should have no place within the tent. For a tentpole resting on nothing but angry rhetoric cannot stand.

And those of us inside that tent will continue to feel threatened and uncomfortable at J Street U forays into our pro-Israel tent.

Given J Street U Brandeis’ behavior and factual misrepresentations, it is imperative that they cease their boycotts of respect and accurate representation of the facts, and instead emerge as a trustworthy and respectful voice. I hope we can unite around a real commitment to listening to and engaging different voices in a more civil and honest manner.  That would really lead to a broad, strong, long-lasting tent.

About the Author: Daniel Mael is a junior at Brandeis University. He is from Newton, MA, and the co-founder of Brandeis Students for Accuracy about Israeli and Palestinian Affairs.


If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

13 Responses to “J Street Activists Defame Former IDF Spokesperson”

  1. Ronit Jacobs says:

    Thank you Daniel for your insightful piece. Unfortunately it is often the case that anti-Israel voices are more interested in silencing Zionists than reaching out and engaging in fruitful discourse. It is a shame that instead of helping the Palestinians and seeking peace, they are divisive and belligerent.

  2. Lloyd Bergner says:

    The J Street group, a craven disgusting lot , have become the voice of self-hating Jews who should be relegated to the dung-pile of irrelevance.

  3. Elise Lowe Newman says:

    Thank you, Daniel, for writing this piece and clarifying what took place. J-Street continues its antics and anti-Israel behavior which is the reason it has little to no influence on Capitol Hill.

  4. And a while back ago some guy from the jewish agency defended J street as pro israel and i told him that he's lying to himself he refused to listen to me and stopped replying to me …. hate to say it avi but "I told you so" …

  5. Danny Mula says:

    There's no such thing as a "Palestinian". Stop using that word. You are legitimizing their cause.

  6. Ronit Jacobs says:

    Danny Mula this is what these people call themselves. What would you have me call them?

  7. Danny Mula says:

    Ronit Jacobs Arabs.

  8. Danny Mula says:

    Ronit Jacobs By the way, how do you know Rabbi Kahn? He taught one of my classes last year at Bar Ilan

  9. Ian M. Sirota says:

    It says something to me about J-Street that its views seem to have more in common with those of the Palestinian Authority than they do with those of Israelis…..

  10. "For some reason, the constant refrain when Philip and his colleagues are criticized for their conduct, they retreat into a victimized viewpoint crouch." — just like the Pals.

  11. J Street is not an anti Israel group. Many Israelis support both Israel and J Street. It's a different more left or liberal anti war and pro compromise perspective. That's all.

Comments are closed.

SocialTwist Tell-a-Friend

Current Top Story
Yehudah Glick on the Temple Mount.
Yehuda Glick’s Condition Stabilizing, “He Was Very Lucky” (1:00 PM)
Latest News Stories
Raining in Jerusalem

Starting the 7th of Cheshvan in the Jewish calendar, Jews in Israel will start inserting the formal request for rain in the 9th blessing of the Amidah prayer.

Yehudah Glick on the Temple Mount.

Doctors are predicting minimal long-term disability to Yehudah Glick following surgery today.

Ikea Instruction

Sweden and John Kerry would make wonderful partners to get lost in the same maze.

Little Heroes

Pictured is an IDF ceremony for graduates of the “Little Heroes” foundation, which works to integrate kids with special needs in society, on October 30, 2014. The annual ceremony is in cooperation with the Logistics Corps in order to strengthen the connection between the IDF and the special needs community.

“It’s serious, there are now genuine questions being asked about whether we will be able to vote Labor next May.”

Does that mean Kerry also will stay away?

He is not in a coma and may undergo another operation today.

Israel’s anti-Netanyahu media might regret their wishes if early elections are held.

Authorities in Peru this week arrested a suspected Hezbollah terrorist who planned to murder Jews. Lebanese citizen Mohammed Hamden was in possession of explosives and other materials when he was arrested, according to the Peruvian Interior Ministry. Police found traces of TNT, detonators and other explosive devices in his apartment. Reports indicate that the suspect […]

Israel decides not to go ahead with huge military purchase from U.S., likely to provoke rumors of continuing feud.

Highlight: Exclusive Interview with Rabbi Yehuda Glick at the Foot of the Temple Mount.

Doctors reported as of 8 p.m. (2 p.m. EDT) Thursday night that there is a “very small” improvement in the condition of Yehuda Glick, gunned down by an Arab terrorists Wednesday night, but that he still is in critical condition and his life remains in danger.

Foreign Minister Lieberman may be playing “chicken.” What happens if France follows Sweden?

Conference of Jewish groups chided the Obama administration for the nasty comments made about Bibi.

More Articles from Daniel Mael
The J Street Challenge was produced by Americans for Peace and Tolerance

J Street U groups should be showing “The J Street Challenge”

J Street U students

J Street and Open Hillel claim they want openness and honesty in the discussion about Israel, but that’s only for those who agree with them.

They were disruptive and rude, after arriving more than an hour into the event.

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/breaking-news/j-street-activists-defame-former-idf-speaker/2013/12/05/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: