web analytics
December 1, 2015 / 19 Kislev, 5776
At a Glance
News & Views
Sponsored Post

House Bill to Slap Financial Penalties on anti-Israel Boycotts

The proposed legislation would prevent American taxpayers from having to subsidize the views of those seeking to marginalize and to penalize Israeli scholars and academic institutions
Cong. Peter Roskam (R-IL) introducing the Protect Academic Freedom Act on Tues., Feb. 4, 2014

Cong. Peter Roskam (R-IL) introducing the Protect Academic Freedom Act on Tues., Feb. 4, 2014
Photo Credit: Cong. Roskam screen capture

In other words, for example, with respect to the ASA boycott: first the secretary of education would determine whether there is an American Studies Department at a given university. If there is, and that AS department or the parent university has not withdrawn from the ASA, the university’s federal funding will be at risk. The same would be true for any other association that passes an academic boycott measure.


Harvard students Sara Greenberg and Yoav Schaefer applauded Harvard University President Drew Faust for condemning the ASA boycott in a letter written to Faust published in the Harvard Crimson earlier this month. The students urged Faust to go the next step, demonstrating “moral leadership and immediately withdraw Harvard’s institutional membership from the ASA.”  The students pointed out that other universities had done exactly that, in the wake of the ASA boycott. Brandeis Univesity, Penn State Harrisburg, Kenyon College and Indiana University have all already withdrawn from the ASA.

The Harvard students asked its university “to uphold its values and set an example for other universities around the country, showing that organizations promoting such boycotts will not only be denounced, but will also lose support from America’s leading academic institutions.”

Now Greenberg and Schaefer can add a financial basis to their moral basis for encouraging Harvard to withdraw from the tainted American Studies Association.

Last month, Congressman Roskam led a bipartisan letter signed by 134 Members of Congress, including Congressman Lipinski, to the American Studies Association (ASA) condemning its academic boycott of Israel.

Congressman Roskam announced this initiative on the House floor on Tuesday morning. Watch the video of his announcement, below. The bill will be referred to the House Committee on Education.

About the Author: Lori Lowenthal Marcus is the U.S. correspondent for The Jewish Press. A graduate of Harvard Law School, she previously practiced First Amendment law and taught in Philadelphia-area graduate and law schools. You can reach her by email: Lori@JewishPressOnline.com

If you don't see your comment after publishing it, refresh the page.

Our comments section is intended for meaningful responses and debates in a civilized manner. We ask that you respect the fact that we are a religious Jewish website and avoid inappropriate language at all cost.

If you promote any foreign religions, gods or messiahs, lies about Israel, anti-Semitism, or advocate violence (except against terrorists), your permission to comment may be revoked.

8 Responses to “House Bill to Slap Financial Penalties on anti-Israel Boycotts”

  1. Romi Itzik says:

    nicht neu Nothing New

  2. Dan Silagi says:

    This is a stupid law, and is blatantly unconstitutional. If the BDSholes are proscribed from boycotting Israel, then it would only be fair to extend the law so that, for instance, American educational institutions can't boycott Italy for what the Italians are trying to do to Amanda Knox. This law would have to be extended to all academic boycotts because a law only forbidding boycotts of Israel would be a bill of attainder (a law affecting only one person or group of people). Even then, it would be a violation of the First Amendment.

  3. Jane Smith says:

    American universities aren't boycotting Italy over the possible extradition of Amanda Knox, so your analogy is ludicrous. The majority of US taxpayers do NOT want to participate in the persecution of the State of Israel or the Jews, and they should not be forced, through taxation, to do so.

  4. Terry Beals says:

    I am for the bill. However, I would say that if they want freedom to "boycott" or anything else, they should not be receiving government funds. Then again, can the government be totally without bias when in comes to spending our tax dollars? Government needs to get TOTALLY OUT of the subsidizing business and let business and institutions operate on their own, the way our nation worked a grew for 200 years. They need to go back to the constitution and do their responsibility stated there and get back to our sure foundations.

  5. How is it unconstitutional? It puts no restrictions on individual rights to say what they want or to boycott who they want. It does not restrict the rights to assemble. It does not promote or discourage any religion. It just prevents government money from being used to prevent others from practicing their rights to practice free speech and to assemble. Really, this bill does more to enhance the first amendment by preventing entities that take government money from promoting their own ideals at the expense of others. Your boycotts are both unconstitutional and anti-intellectual, and anybody supporting them has no interest in furthering the collective knowledge of mankind. Government grants should only go towards expanding our understanding of the universe around us, not as tools of pseudo-intellectuals to destroy part of that universe and understanding. If you still want to boycott Israel, start or join your own movement without government money or join the neo-nazis… this bill doesn't restrict your freedoms to do either.

  6. Lynn Bianca Baronti says:

    So glad something is being done about this.

  7. Maynard Miller says:

    I'll keep my fingers crossed that the bill will pass. Who ever came up with the idea to boycott Israel, our friend? Why not boycott our enemies i.e. North Korea and Iran? We are over run by dummies in this country.

  8. Lani Lowell says:

    Stopping The libel and slander against the State of Israel is hardly preferential treatment. This bill is preventing the unfair singling out of Israel by special interests groups who have no interest in acknowledging or presenting facts , simply because they want to block the development of Jews.When does free speech turn into attack, libel and slander with untruths? I think this bill is a great advancement exactly because it addresses that issue. When Jewish students feel intimidated on campuses across the country! it is simply time to address the anti semitic elephant in the living room.

Comments are closed.

Current Top Story
French Jews about to move to Israel at French de Gaulle airport.
Security Passes Being Scrutinized in Paris Airport

Printed from: http://www.jewishpress.com/news/house-bill-to-slap-financial-penalties-on-anti-israel-boycotts/2014/02/06/

Scan this QR code to visit this page online: